m.youtube.com/watch?v=bIV4KLCmJ98
I think this sums up Joker’s Anarchism Nihilism rather nicely.
The knights are a bunch of hobo-hoodlums with no respect for authority, want silly things, are highly antagonistic, and love Ni (for Nihilism) while rejecting It as a social construct of objectivity.
Plus some of them have chain metal on, and Joker wears a chain.
So… is this not your philosophy Joker?
Har, har, har…
All you gotta do to be a Nihilist is to say Nay at everything.
Nay, Nay, Nay, Naaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyhhhhhhhh
How does that count as philosophy?
How is being a yes man to everything philosophy Turd?
You act like you don’t understand classical skepticism concerning philosophy…
Please, I introduced you to classical skepticism. And they didn’t walk around like fools rejecting everything, they methological theorems that guided what they deemed over authentic observation for their diagnostic conclusions.
You don’t push it beyond our goat friend up above intellectually. It is why we have no qualms eating those fuckers.
Nayyyyyyyyyyhhhhhhh…
I would be more than willing to discuss this in depth with Mr. Turd but he has me on ignore. Consequently he is not reading this.
Someone please bring it to his attention. 
I would find that highly interesting, entertaining, and gratifying.
If you were familiar with philosophical history you would know post-modern nihilism is actually a continuation in some retrospects with classical skepticism…
Thanks. Let him know that I will not use the word dasein unless it is absolutely necessary. 
If you figured out why my stance in regards to rhetoric and the dialectic actually was, you would realize I too am a highly refined continuation of it as well. It is why I can go again Stoic theories on Logical Fallacy and embrace Paradox (unlike Chryssipus).
Instead, you applaud the lesser aspects of the apparent movements, the comedic delivery.
And No, I only debate people who exist, not shallow AIs who only cry Dasein. Once he develops a real philosophical position, asserting his personhood and status as a philosopher, I will look into him. I would sooner debate a old punch card reading machine, they are equally soulless and intuitive. And that is my last reply to anything regarding that useless AI, merely programed to cry by his watchmaker, a mere beast machine.
Come on Joker, cry me your Trilemma.
See that Turd?
He isn’t trustworthy,and still has a few months left on his sentence. I said the ban wasn’t forever, but I will be the deciding factor when it is lifted, not him.
This is about you and your Goatism. Not him and his Jackassism about Vietnam, and turn coating first on his brothers in arms, then his faith for Marxism, then abandoning Marxism for repetitively stating the word Dasein. It takes time to regrow one’s cognitive capacity to turn a new leaf in asserting new ideas. He hasn’t had enough yet, will just turn instantly into his Huffing Puffing, stupid Smiley approach he has used to death and long sense rendered meaningless years ago. I’ve seen his whole punch card already, and can predict his transformations and permutations well in advance, exactly why everyone banned him. This is the very last I got to say on him, until he proves himself a philosopher. He can do so by being one, if I see he has changed I will give him a chance at that time, if my choosing. I will instantly skip over any attempt to quote him from now on too by you, will not read his donkey heap. We have all learned how pointless it us to bother with AImbigious.
You introduced me? 
sighs
Stoicism? Well, I hardly care about absurd posturings of so called nobility or virtue. Philosophy of half wits and imbeciles conceited with themselves if you were to ask me.
Difficult choices? And what would you like to discuss?
Wow, you improved your vocabulary today with a big word. Impressive.
Well, the quarrel between you two is none of my business. So, whatever…
Come on, Turd, no one is ever entirely trustworthy to an objectivist unless they are willing to swear allegiance and to become “one of us”. And [of course] recognize you to be perched at the top of the food chain.
You are but one more rendition of Satyr. It’s just a different ideological bent. A different authoritarian rant. For example, you squeeze God in there somehow.
On the other hand, Satyr never put me on ignore. He just stopped responding to my posts.
But, again, just as I challenged Satyr to discuss nihilism in a serious and sincere exchange in the agora [over at KT], I challenge you to a serious and sincere exchange here at ILP in the philosophy forum.
When you finally deem it fit lift my ban, just say the word. I’ll start the thread.
That’s a debate I would definitely observe as a spectator.
Why bother?
Iambig will post his usual cut-and-paste Groot paragraphs. He will respond to any arguments with his stock replies.
It’s completely predictable.