Doesn’t this come dangerously close to judging the whole?
Aren’t axioms metaphysical?
Isn’t believing, for example, in the Persistant Self, metaphysical?
Don’t most of us get by all day on metaphysical ideas including the separation of subject and object, free will, the impossibility of or the possibility of action at a distance, the existence of other minds, that what we experience is not a constructed ‘thing’ but reality, and so on?
I mean who isn’t a metaphysician, at least some of the time?
So, perhaps, in The end, one cannot judge The whole; but neither can one avoid judging It, from The beginning. We are, instead, meaning A whole, which is otherwise meaningless.
And a mind attempts to move, and cannot avoid doing so (brackets on meditation here). And in doing so, language and sentience is processed, and everything is endlessly subject to judgement, so long as there is meaningfully any movement.
I don’t think one can come at life without having made some metaphysical assumptions. Or to put this another way - we all rely on intuition and many of our intuitions are implicitly metaphysical stances.
One person’s metaphysics is another person’s common sense is another person’s cult is another person’s indefensible hypothesis.
Yes, and our judgements are to some extent or other unavoidably erroneous, perhaps precisely in relation to whatever degree we insist for them to be true. In fact, we’re primarily thought-reproduction systems, and our metaphysical assumptions are as necessary to the process as is our first predication.