I’m not a unique source of enlightened truth. I am good at a few things, and other things I’m not good at. I tried to develop what appealed to me the most and seemed easiest or most efficient. Each human born is different and they will thus have their own type of gift. I’m not very gifted. But I do have a little gift. Now I’m trying to use it, but I’m desperate in a way. Life on earth is spiritually harsh.
No I learned from others mainly. These aren’t “unseen forces”. They are people which had experiences. They were empirical, but not ‘scientific’, but truly empirical. They are based on what was perceived and experienced.
I’m not a messenger but I wanted to make a post saying that development of the soul and its chief vehicle is extremely important.
Now that part isn’t a bad thing. Although I don’t aim to share with the whole world. Just with a few. That is all that is usually possible.
I’ll tell you what.
I’m going to amuse you some more, by trying to assess you.
From the little I’ve seen, and from your repeated straw man, I think you have a cognitive deformity.
Now, some Christians already know this is the case, in that we inherited ‘sinful flesh’. They know we have a deformity. They suggest forgiveness, although the apostles were supposed to have healed it as well, besides forgiving it. You, on the other hand, are not trying to guide me like Jesus patiently did, nor are you trying to heal my own deformity, or forgive it. Instead you are trying to be witty and at the same time undermining what important information I wanted to highlight. My dad is a christian himself, and he does have a deformity, but his thinking is based around love of nature. He is much different than you. I think you have this cognitive deformity so bad, that you don’t want the ‘cure’ for it. The ‘cure’ requires so much self change, creativity, happiness, interest, hope, insight, wisdom, good genes, freedom, etc. That it is far far easier to default into a slightly altered traditionalism. Dogmatism interbreeding with skepticism. This is prominent in religious and atheist groups alike. It is one of mankind’s great weaknesses. So what you do, is come in, read what I wrote, or maybe you didn’t even read all of it. I don’t know, I hope you at least read it. Then with little time or effort, you say : oh, dan fits into the category of those boring monists who thinks the truth gravitates purely around their own view. Dan is closed-minded. Read him like a book. Easy. Yep. I’m done. He’s not worth my effort.
But you see, my OP says that morality is good, goodness is good, and good souls need to “evolve” as fast as they can at their core, in the areas where it is possible. There is nothing wrong with saying that. It is completely true. And to anyone who can understand basics, it is obvious to them that this is a basic truth.