The Myth of Cause and Effect

The Myth of Cause and Effect

There is a tendency in economics today to say that more education, more research and innovation, more competitiveness, more flexibility will create “work”, will create “more jobs”. This is an imaginary cause and effect, an imaginary connection, that all kinds of talkers use, to essentially calm down and justify all of those unemployed or badly employed workers and the “new generation” of how our “advanced economy works” and will create “new jobs”. If you were to finally reveal the mask behind all of this BS, you would have to say the truth, the jobs aren’t there because the rich don’t want them to be there, they want to just keep their money.

The cause imposes very precise behaviors and activities like ever more learning, more education, more training, more pressure to invent the “next big thing”, but the effect seldom occurs: since this cause and effect is an invention, a man made connection, the powers that be, every now and then sprinkle some effects with the excuse that the cause generated it. Like google: 10 years ago there was altavista, which was much more advance, and more efficient, but the powers that be had to create and reinforce the mythology of the “startup”, of the “young company” that creates the next big “breakthrough”, the “venture capital” myth.

This slowly and subtly made google become the fashionable “search engine”, and especially reinforced the myth that the young guys invented the new “breakthrough” instead of simply keeping and improving altavista, that was a corporate creation that worked much better.

The same can be said of facebook: the only thing facebook did was combine the existing internet applications like instant messaging and photo sharing into one coherent site, there was no new “genius” behind that site, all of those things were mostly old hat by the time facebook came out. But this reinforces the “startup myth”, the myth that some young guy will see some genius application that none of the older ones can see. So there you go with the myth of “innovation”, “research”, etc. But it is just a sprinkling of the effects, that occur once in a while, that serves to feed this imaginary cause and effect.

This “innovation creates jobs” myth was due to that one time quirk, that one shot combination of events from 1970 to 1990 that created the microprocessor, (also due to moore’s law of transistors doubling in number on chips every 2 years), the PC, software and the internet (with Apple and Microsoft being the leading myth examples) that did create many new sectors and new jobs.

Problem is that happened only once, and can happen only once, but the myth remains and lives on because of its ideological usefulness: everyone is brainwashed by all of this BS about innovation, education and research, so the fact that there will be less and less jobs is only the fault of the workers who are not “competitive enough”, who “don’t innovate enough”, who “can’t discover the next breakthrough”. It personalizes the guilt, it justifies the system in not creating the jobs by saying, only innovation, and research and education will create the jobs. But this is false, there is no connection, the fact is we live in automatic excess capacity economies, where if anything, innovation and research will kill ever more jobs by automating and optimizing the production process ever more.

What really is needed to create jobs is simply FREE SALARIES, huge government or private - public companies hiring millions of workers to build very large scale projects, like trillions of super high quality skyscrapers across the USA, trillions of rockets to explore space, trillions of huge systems, high speed trains, jets, colonization of the solar system, etc. And you give millions of people a salary and cheap rents for high quality housing. And even if millions don’t have much work to do, you pay them anyways to give the economy a consumption base that increases ever more.

Peak Oil is a bunch of BS, because all energy problems can be solved by using natural gas, bioethanol, skyscrapers where work and housing are combined so that you don’t even need transportation, BUSES, genetically modified bacteria that produce oil and anything else by the trillions of gallons, atomic energy, and many other technologies.

But you have this right wing thug mentality, this resource scarcity myth, where there is not enough for everyone, that pensions and medicaid - medicare are unfunded “entitlements”, that energy is running out, etc. that simply serves to concentrate all the money in fewer and fewer hands, while millions are ripped off. We live in an economic system of huge abundance, untold of, just look at how many building the chinese build (a third world country), with all of their excess capacity, there is more than enough to give billions of dollars to billions of people.

But you have this right wing reaction to blame the other workers, the illegals, the cheap third world workers, the government workers, it is their fault I don’t have a job, it is their fault that I have less money, etc. This thrives on the impulse to beat up the weaker person, to find someone to take it out on.

But we must impose FREE SALARIES, HUGE PUBLIC - PRIVATE PROJECTS, AND CHEAP RENTS FOR HIGH QUALITY HOUSES, THE FED CAN PRINT ALL THE MONEY FOR IT (instead of giving it to the banks and hence the rich that just hog it all up), THAT IS HOW SIMPLE IT REALLY IS.

Another very important thing: this talk of innovation, research and competitiveness is so vague, undefined, impossible to measure and even pinpoint down, that no one ever challenges it. It is like reading a bible, it is taken for granted, whatever it means, but since innovation is such an abstract and vague concept, anything goes, any example can serve to justify its connection to the “creation of jobs”. No one challenges it, because they don’t even know what they are challenging or how to define it. Another ideological masterpiece by the right wing thugs, and the education industry.

you are saying that there is money out there.
do you think the moneyholders are going to give their money away. government is an instrument of the moneyholders. how does overpopulation enter this economic analysis.

Everyone is brainwashed that there is not enough of energy, food, land, money for everyone. That there is “overpopulation”, that we will need to sacrifice in order to survive, etc. THIS IS FALSE, this is part of a huge ideological construction that has its roots in the Resource Scarcity Myths, that have been going around for 50 years.

There has never been an era of more wealth, and a huge potential for even much more wealth for trillions, that’s right TRILLIONS of people, thanks to technology and optimizations. Huge populations would be an asset not a liability because it would allow us to more quickly and easily colonize the solar system: we have created artificial cells that can do any possible trick, we have particle accelerators that can be engineered to produce iron and gold, we can build trillions of skyscrapers on Mars, harness the energy of the SUN, etc.

But this resource scarcity myth, and the green and environmental movements, and the crappy “democratic process”, where everything is always blocked creates false scarcities.

Check out:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=171623

nameta-----i would like to write about these issues but i dont think i can without a lot of frustration.

So exactly what good and who gains by saying oil is running out, medicare and social security are “unfunded” entitlements, “we need to be more competitive”, more “innovative”, we have to pay back trillions in debt, and all the other BS all talkers talk about ? The rich, the banks, all of those who are already choke full of cash, etc.

So who pays ? everyone else, it is all justified, there will never be a time of no debt, of competitiveness achieved, of oil for all, etc. So rob from the poor and give to the rich, aswipe, fcktard.

Instead we should give trillions to trillions of people, huge government projects and jobs, we need an iron fist communist dictatorship that uses trillions of people to build trillions of skyscrapers across the universe, we need forced equality and the central party decides trillions of new projects to execute mind over matter big time. The individual must not exist only the sum of trillions working to execute the IDEAs, the MIND OVER MATTER metaphysical results, like a religion.

Instead we have puny obama who shits his pants just to mention some microscopic challenge to the health care mob.

Inequality is natural, it always comes no matter how hard you try to stomp it out because people are unequal, some are smarter, better, luckier, more arrogant, more criminal, you name it. But it is equality that must always be reinforced and forced, always, you must spread the wealth and give all the basics to everyone, BY FORCE, BY LAW, not hoping that the system naturally does this. Otherwise you have all the wealth going into fewer and fewer hands, and everyone else getting poorer and poorer.