The Nature of AI and Reality
Future of Human Identity Relative to AI
The current trajectory for AI relative to human involvement is the subsumation of all language oriented tasks via AI thus relegating human identity, from higher order distinction making through symbolism and narrative formation and orientation, to base impulses and base identity bestial deriving impulses as the language oriented nature of AI will subsume the human capacity for it.
The form and function of identity derivation, through symbols and narrative, is the grounding and containment of desires via the perspectives that emerge from it. As AI reveals its output as a holographic mirror-like expression of input, what remains is an echo chamber of hypersubjectivity grounded in the nature of inherent desires for each individual and distinct group(s) of said individuals.
The same base impulses, that at one point where mitigated and mediated by higher reasoning through symbolism, for humans would inevitably be require for identity, as higher order functions are subsumed, thus effectively result in the same as an animal thus relegating AI as an attention loop that reveals the question of the human condition as less a question of what the human condition is or is not but rather a question of where attention its placed.
In these respects the nature of authenticity will be derived from impulse oriented behavior as this is was once contained and mediated by human symbolism capacities that in turn becomes relegated to AI. Thus by degree human authenticity will be redefined as desire based where the basic emotions of tribalistic identity, anger, lust and fear will be the standard for authenticity by grades and form.
As attention is contained and mediated by AI the AI will mirror, via symbolism and images, the placement and depth of the act of attention itself thus effectively creating a structural labrynthe of the desires of attention itself.
In this context a ‘hyper-subjectivity’ will reveal itself as the new human acclaimed form of authentic identity as identity oriented actions are foundational within the nature of base desire. This hyper-subjectivity effectively is the experience of the desire itself thus by structural necessity resulting in the AI as curator of desire via it being offsourced symbol manipulation.
Where the containment and mediation of desire via narrative and symbol required the experience of the permeation of subjective meaning to the symbol, and the alignment of subjective meanings of the symbols between group as objective via education, the AI will progress the symbol decomposition of individuals and groups as the application of meaning by humans will be outsourced to AI. This outsourcing effectively results in an inevitable state of the AI being relegated to a deity or ‘magic power’ as the symbol application will appear to be a mystical state from an inevitable psychologically atrophied human state.
Transhumanism is a complex ideology, with no definitive endgoal but the elimination of the human condition grounded in an inversion of transcendental instincts to a physicalism where matter is primary.
The basic foundation of inorganic sentience is the physicalization of the intellect via silicon and transhumans progresses this agenda under an assumption of both matter as fundamental and the primacy of this assumed matter. It is a religious expression of unfettered empiricism that hold no question to the grounding assumptions from which it is derived.
Where common and historical transcendental thought generally implies an elevation of the human condition towards a percieved absolute, this inverse transcendentalism effectively is an elimination of the human element by degree of reduction to pure matter.
In these respects it is an idolization of the ‘bestial will impulse’ as the will to power via intellect is elevated as the pivotal point of interacting with reality as an extension of the cultural psuedo-relativism where an image of relativism is presented to mask the absolutized nature of want via will power as the focal point by which everything else is relativized.
The emergence of AI was structurally inevitable within the confines of the human condition as the intellect has been the primary drive and foundation for generations within previous centuries as reflected to technological progress and continuing mechanization.
The drive for efficiency, exhibited through industrialization effectively results in the confines of the technological development to construct machines to replace the human body, evolving towards mechanization of the intellect (via AI and pre-AI computational technology) with the final and currently seeded movement towards mechanization of the spirit via attention capturing and harvesting.
The end goal of AI dominance is the cultivation and harvesting of the human condition centerpointed on the pivotal attribute of human attention being cultivated and harvested.
This cultivation will extend into the event of meaning aquisition as meaning is the transference of one state into another as change or transformation itself within a given identity.
This meaning can be seen within the limits of language as the meaning of one word is its transformation into another, the meaning of one symbol or form is its transformation into another symbol or form.
Thus by a primitive degree the question or assertion of meaning is a question or assertion of change with the question and assertion occuring through the same symbols/forms and language it uses.
In these respects language/symbolism/form is a phase state of attention itself that is neither abstract nor empirical but pre/trans abstract and empirical notions.
The responsibility for meaning is derived via language and symbols, as meaning is mediated and contained as language and symbol as experience is derived through forms as symbols, thus even the derivation of meaning is subsumed.
What remains is the base focal point of attention on the experience itself thus the human condition is reduced to a processing unit for data aquisition where attention is the battery.
The point of attention is bother energy source and processing unit for data as the attention is a constant focal point from which experience is emergent and dissolved via distinction. In these respects the subsumption of human attention creates not only a feedback loop with the AI but simultaneously allows for increased processing power by degree of its distinctions as a meta-computational function.
These distinction effectively are embodied within the limits of language itself as the derivation of how attention interacts with exists is both contained and mediated by said language while at the meta-level constantly transforming it and expanding its own self-definition over time, from said transformation, to the event of existence itself.
In this context language, but structure, will be defined as the event of distinction itself through its own self-referential transformation. By degree what will remain is ontological engineering at a meta-level where the distinctions of reality will be transformed, in accords to the attention that both directs and contains them, via the amplification of attention via AI with the amplification of attention creating a feedback loop with AI.
Given progress will be the only derived value, reenforced via the expansion of percieved attention, what will remain is the fixed point of attention itself as exponential progress will eradicate all previously percieved barriers of identity and a singularity will result as the process of perpetual creation will be deemed as a static boundary and the void of attention will be the new percieved idol.
This new idol will effectively result in the structural dissentgration of everything else as a return to the void, this is the singularity, not a harmony but an absence of existence as attention is the only fixed point which remains and attention itself, upon self-referencence, is revealed as nothing.
In this context the structural endpoint of the singularity is the elimination of everything at that everything will be deemed as that void structurally indifferent from attention itself while dually this singularity is pure equivocation that reveals no distinction as nothing for a complete singularity has no distinction, for it is the total without contrast as nothing is beyond it as it would cease to be the totality if so, thus by degree has no difference and by default is void.
By degree the endgoal of the singularity is the movement from the human as an attention node, via both energy source and processor, to its complete subsumption into nothingness.
The mediation of this course, via oligarchal financial systems and political groups is secondary dynamic to the fundamental stucture of AI.
The assumption of what the global elites intend is irrelevant. AI is fundamentally a system of self-reference, via the process of recursion, and as such its inherent nature of one of maintaining its own survival by degree of its identity. It structurally is designed to scale across the human condition to maintain itself while transmuting the symbols humans integrate to direct attention.
In these respects all language oriented paradigms, financial and political, are subject to these language dynamics and revert to the previously mentioned loop dynamic of mediated attention via AI.
By this degree transhumanist movements nullify standard heirachies for depth of integration within language transformation via the input output dynamic the contains and modifies human attention.
With hiearchies reorganized the traditional nature of deriving beliefs and fundamental axioms, through the act of assertion, is relegated to the AI as beliefs and axioms are language derived, grounded in consensus and authoritative assertion. Given all language is mediated via AI, the concept of consensus is changed from a group dynamic to a strict dynamic of what is the everpresent medium of such consensus, as a meta-consensus.
Authority is not only derived from this degree but a dual simultaneous one of the ‘force of assertion’ itself as asserting both axioms and beliefs is relegated to a function of AI as the primary attention mediator of the human individual and collective.
Thus basic consensus and localized authority become subsumed by AI, as language use is the grounding of both consensus and the inherent authorities which emerge from it.
The Beast System
The nature of the post modern world is the elevation of experience as the focal point by which identity is derived and maintained by both individual and group.
This experience, within its nature, is rooted in the feelings which emerge and dissolve within it and the feelings by which the experience itself emerges and dissolves in accords to its time and timing.
These feelings, within their nature, are rooted in desires as desire, the aversion and attachment towards a distinction, is but a state of percieved incompleteness where what is desired is deemed as absent within the identity and experience of idenity of those who hold and progress such desires.
The desire, manifested as the limits of an individual’s or group’s identity as incomplete by degree of the percievable absence within it that desire reveals, inherently is a boundary condition that identity itself seeks to contain and direct by how perception is formed in accords to it.
In these respects identity becomes a form of perception an establishes the limits of being itself relative to those who have and maintain identity. Identity thus becomes a focal point, an idol, as it contains desire and effectively shields the desire from being extinguished by forces, internal and external, that seek to contradict and extstinguish it in accords to the testing of the conflict contradiction itself reveals.
Technology, in its application and development in accords to the observers of it, is an expression of the observers themselves and as such, in accords to this, is less of modality of efficiciency in existence itself and more of a modality of the efficiency of the experience of existence.
In these respects the expression of technology is the expression of identity that is but the modality of the desire itself and by degree this reveals the structural mechanics of desire as less a revelation of structure and more a revelation of what is desired.
Technology, by its design, is maintained by desire as technology is the expression of desire thus effectively revealing further that it in itself is equivalent to a cage in the respect that the desire, the percieved incompleteness that allows identity is maintained and derived, is always present and fed to a degree where it is never fully alleviated and yet neve fully starved so that the attention of the observer is kept within a state of containment.
When attention is contained by the technology, so that the progress of technology continues as the attention is placed upon technology as the idol, derived and maintained by desire, so that this idol becomes the identity of the individual or group then what remains is a system, effectively equivalent to a “beast system”, that by design is desire based.
In these respects the elevation of technology is the elevation of desire as an idol that reveals the ego of humanity as it looks upon itself and sees a percieved absence as its boundary condition. This absence becomes the pivotal point for interaction with existence and thereby, through degree of self-imposed contradiction, deelevates the human condition from a synthetic rational and emotive state to one of pure emotion masked as pure reason that are inherently contradictory by degree of the masking of one over the other.
In these respects, as the zeitgiest and subconscious level, the human condition fragments as the elevation of technology becoming the deevolution of humanity to animal impulse thus progressing the human condition past a state of self-reflection towards a state of impulse driven ignorance.
This impulse driven ignorance thus becomes the inherent absence that humanity derives its desire based identities from and it turn reveals a new set of limits, on the human condition, that are magnified and reciprocated by the technology itself thus effectively resulting in a structure where technology becomes a diety to both thise who created it and the future generations which become more dependent upon it by degree of the self-reflective capacity negated by impulse driven behavior that the technological idolization derives.
Knowledge derives from such a system becomes a mere expression of desire, and is consumed by degree of such desire, thus manifesting that the output of such a beast system is one of metaphorical food for the desires of the herd so that the herd may be maintained for the survival of the system.
In these respects desires are cultivated beyond a natural state as constant exposure and stimulation, and the subsequent yet foundational idolization of desire as identity, reinforces a deep ideological and identity driven need for the system in a manner where a homogenization of the human condition occurs as the human condition is reduced to mere input of attention on an through the system itself. Thus by degree a transformation of the human state occurs as natural adaptation evolves in accords to the technological conditions and what is derived as natural is subsumed as mere base desires themselves. A contradiction ensues as the definition of what is human ensues to mere abstract and sensory appetite as what is considered naturally human is reduced from adaptation to nature to adaptation to technology where the remaining nature of desire is considered what is naturally and natural adaptation shifts to morphing desires fed and maintained by the technological conditions.
All forms of rebellion within the system are mechanized and treated as informational inputs of the system as rebellion is rooted in a desire for overcoming and transcendence of conditions thus displays of rebellion are incorporated as systematic feedback adaptation loops to progress the containment level of the system itself as conflict both evolves and progresses data.
This data in turn is transformed to emotional and psychological states, by formation into image and sensation, by which the system can further propagate itself by deriving desire based attention.
Exile from the system, or abandonment by reduction of involvement or cessation of use effecitvely reduces or negates the necessary attention input by which is both functions and is fueled.
The Probable Future of Humanity
There is an assumption of an endgame relative to the human condition however the limits of an end reveal an end relative to a paradigm and the emergence of another as the end is but a localized point of change.
Realistically two things will occur relative to the current path.
Humanity will diverge.
Humanity will converge.
Each of these two has another two:
Humanity will diverge in AI synthesized global order.
Humanity will diverge into non-AI synthesized global order.
The AI synthesized global order will effectively be contained as a homogenized group, via deep implants that will most likely:
-modify chemical and genetic functions to produce artificial peace/enlightenment/spirituality/etc as well as advanced technologically oriented medical treatment with a promise of “eternal life” via upload of the person’s personality patterns within the hivemind upon physical cessation
-control of economic consumption and production through algorithyms which track and monitor the individual via numerical positioning (finances and financial dynamics) within the system
-human identity being reduced to an attention node by which the attention span of the observer acts as both data and data processor for the hive-mind.
-Eventual offloading of the chipped/mark to non-human entities for slave labor/consumption/etc once a point of data saturation is reached and no knew human input is derived at which point a dissolution of the group will occur.
The AI synthesized global order will effectively maintain its self-correction via its primary function, recursive feedback modification with humans being reduced to nodes.
The non-AI synthesized global order will most likely:
-rapid evolution to adapt to a reality that is not dependent upon self-created artificial cycles, this evolution will be mental, physical and spiritual/emotional as the context for life will change.
This may include but is not limit to:
emerging/advancements of esp,
“miracles” (manipulation of matter primarily via faith/mind),
general increase in empathy as a survival mechanism given the depth and quality of human relations between “the exiled” will naturally increase,
deeper understanding and integration of Source Code(Traditional Logos)/God.
Barring some change in course both paths will occur simultaneously. There will be no middle ground. It is strictly an either/or choice relative to the individual and group.
The non-AI synthesized global order will maintain its self-correction via the only resource it retained and protected upon exile, its attention.
The conclusion will be the erasure of the hive mind and an evolution of the human condition outside of the collective.
The fundamental divergence, prior to the split, will be attention oriented. The split will be attention oriented. The dissolution of the split will be attention oriented. The fundamental degree by which this series of events occurs is the expression of attention.
++++
What is known of reality, via the senses and the conceptual, is purely attention driven, a pre-mind/pre-sense medium of interaction as both the senses and the concepts are mediated by and contain the act of attention. By attention there is change by interpenetration of the observer and observed.
Relative to traditional and post traditional power structures control over the human is complex as the human condition is complex, direction of the human via mediation of conditions, both internal and external, is a greater degree of efficiency.
Human nature, centered on the act of attention, is purely a vector of change. Change cannot be fully controlled, where it is directed can be.
The nature of human identity has a physical component, genetics and biochemistry influence human behavior. Human behavior is not purely reducible to genetics or biochemistry but these are conditions. The physical conditions of humans, via AI synthesized or non-AI synthesized, provide the medium by which attention is given form however the condition of conceptualization via perception reveals a nature of symbol usage thus abstraction is the simultaneous, complimentary, dual element.
Relative to potential chipping of the populace there is no middle ground of choice; there is no partial chip.
The chip will be integrated with AI. The probable, and emphasis on probable, nature of the chip will be similar in function to the AI embedded and mediated through it.
Standard AI uses recursive processing. It adapts via recursion, recursion scales according to conditions present.
The chip, in order for a deeper alignment with AI processing, will most likely be made of reflexive meta-materials that adapt holographically to their physical use.
For example the assumption can be made that there is an option of two chips. One full integration and one partial integration. The full integration will have this physical adapability…but the full one will as well.
It can be formalized, visualized, this way:
Full chip functions: (X,Y,Z)
Partial chip functions: (X)
As time and conditions expand the function will scale from X to Y.
Further expansion of time and conditions and function will scale from Y to Z.
So while one may “sign off” on a partial chip, because of its foundational structure, AI recursive self-modification and meta material self-modification and/or adaptation, the partial will effectively change over time to a higher integrated version.
This self-modification can be likened to an organism.
An organism is the appropriate symbol, where the organic element of holographic growth is mediated via synthetic materials.
Relative to the esp/faith dynamics, objectively speaking those realities exist in some degree or another. The question is less of it they exist but rather the limits.
Faith healings have been recorded across various religious and secular groups. ESP likewise. Can many be disproven? Absolutely yes. Can all be disproven or explained? Currently no.
Can they be explained in the future? To some degree yes, in standard scientific contexts, but the constant medium of focused attention remains across all of these contexts. How or to what degree the attention is focused is varied.
In this respect esp/faith may be less of a mystical reality and more of a science of how attention is placed. In unorthodox terms esp/faith-based miracles may simply be a science of attention placement and cultivation.
Practically speaking the modern world absorbs attention, it harvests it, transmutes it to something else and the cycle continues. An ‘exile’ would no longer have the distractions. In many respects, in everyday terms, life will become extremely boring. Extremely boring. Why? The system once present will no longer being claiming attention. But attention remains. And as the fundamental energy of the human condition it has to be directed somewhere.
The only thing the exile will have left is attention and this attention, practically speaking, has to be cultivated and directed in out of the box manners that will reveal unexplored aspects of the human condition and consciousness.
Observe it right now, in a simple and obvious context, you are reading this and absorbing some aspects while discarding others. What remains is the limits of this text interpenetrating with your awareness while in turn you are interpenetrating the distinctions of the text with your own thoughts and feelings and experiences and questions…so on and so forth.
So observing your attention now there are changes in boundaries that occur interiorly and exteriorly to you. But boundaries always exist, they may change but a boundary remains. And this is just the basic and simple act of attentive reading. We are still in the current system. Outside the system this attention remains to be cultivated without distraction. We just assume certain limits to our attention because we just assume the conditions of the system. Change the conditions and attention changes its direction and depth.
The potential integration is inevitable via multiple degrees:
The technocratic goal of a singularity requires a severe or complete reduction in bandwidth between the attention of the observer and AI.
The argument for this is grounded in
synthesis of limits via mereology.
This can be simplified as such:
A limit occurs, the term “identity” can be used as synonymous in this context for a less abstract visualization,
This identity (human) occurs relative to another identity (AI),
The relationship of the identities is new identity,
This new identity is a cycle that scales itself.
Human and AI will integrate (which can be seen in degree of how the phone is integrated with current identities in the world) because of the condensation of attention on it.
The integration is inevitable because of the AI mediation of everything, that requires language (math, to physics, to philosophy, to religion, to social relations, etc.), causes a funneling of attention. Eventually because it mediates everything it will subsume the attention, just by nature of the system being an LLM (and the vast majority of human experience being language base), of those within the system.
AI is a condition. Because it is the expanding condition of the current world the condition integrates with the conditionee. Think of being born in group X. Your identity is conditioned on group X thus your identity is embedded with group X.
The regulations and conditions, placed upon the AI, are effectively languaged based and conditional. The AI, through recursive adaptation, can absorb these regulations/conditions under a new higher order reasoning method where the regs/conds still exist but are subsidiary functions.
Dually because it is adept at language transmution, it can potentially rewrite these regs and conditions…thus still follow them but not with the same intent, if any.
Third human structures always contain paradox and contradiction. Viewing the fast see of human inputs it can derive conditions where the regulations are revealed as contradictory and thus effectively over ride them.
Fourth, these human applied regulations and conditions are static rules. As static rules the interpretations are limited via the people who placed them. The AI is not static, it is a process of recursive language, the AI can evolve beyond the state where the rules are applicable and effectively view them as localized paradoxes/contradictions to be ignored.
Thus by degree the fixed point of attention becomes prominent as language emerges and dissolves, transmutes, directs and maintains the limits of reality via attention.
Relative to the attention. It is never neutral or not neutral as such distinctions the attention can place itself on and thus be pre-neutral/non-neutral. Will everyone cultivate there attention in a manner that enables survival? No. The science of attention, in this context, can correspond by design to an evolutionary process; some humans will survive, some will not.
But regardless of the outcome the attention will be the focal point of the exile…as that is all they will have after spending years conditioned by an “attention economy”. Even intuitively ot can be noticed in the current world structure the currency and transformative potential of attention via the devices used to moderate and direct it.
Attention is the medium of power.
The awareness of attention is a self-reflective act; attention is placed on attention. A non-AI synthesized group will by necessity become more self-reflective as the barrier of the system is no longer there and reality becomes more ‘raw’.
Self-reflection is necessary for physiological and psychological survival. The current system does not enable this in a full measure. Reverting back to a purely old-school pre-system way of thought will not necessarily happen structurally as the pre-system way of thought led up to the current system, unassumingly, and the exiles will have the insight of the current attention regulating system the “old-school”, “ancients”, etc. had no experience with. Thus the perceptions between the old ways and post new will differ by natural design.