Fine Trixie, I’m more than willing to let you go to Germany to break men of their sexusl oppression by letting them have your ass.
Everyone wins.
Now see, believe it or not, this is a complete non-sequitor from everything else you said, and from the question I asked. It’s only connected if what you’re really doing is proposing a theory designed to insulate liberal immigration ‘policy’ from criticism.
Look, it’s really very simple: the liberals in control of Western Europe declared that tons of refugees were coming in whether the people liked it or not, and that all dissent was racism. You bought it hook line and sinker, we talked about it in the rant house. Germany went so far as to work out a deal with Facebook to help restrict people disagreeing with the immigration policy. Now the refugees are engaging in behavior that anybody could have seen coming:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article … nging.html
the state is responding by issuing a gag order to further restrict police from reporting crimes refugees are involved in:
bild.de/news/inland/sex-uebe … .bild.html
So it’s not even a question of being critical of conspiracy theories, or posing the fewest number of entities: you have a perfectly serviceable conspiracy playing out right in front of you if you’re into that sort of thing, and you’re tossing it aside for one with no evidence because it places blame on the people you’d prefer to place it on, and exonerates those you’d prefer to exonerate.
At the root cause of all of this is a denial of reality- that there could be anything inherently messed up or dangerous about allowing millions of unidentified Muslim men into nations full of white people. It’s the typical preference of ideology over reality that’s causing all of this.
Ummm… honestly, though there may be a racial aspect to the women being seen as unattainable attractive in their home countries (they see them on TV and magazines, models), the Arabs would of done this had they been sent to Japan and China too.
Its much less a race thing and more a buffet of seemingly free puss and a feel of freedom to do whatever they want without intimidation.
This is hardcore sexism, not racism, though I won’t deny a element of interracial sexual repression/ desire is going on. Many Arab men will find a white girlfriend eventually, many won’t. Its just new to them. Its all the more reason for cops to encourage their groups to break up into ever smaller units when on the street, so it doesn’t become a US vs THEM racial segregation mentality. You want them thinking of themselves more as Germans day by day, and not consciously Super-Arab because of who they exclusively hang with and talk to.
Its why I like Albanian immigrants the best in America, all Albanians hate other Albanians, they will put up with working with one another for a short time, but want to integrate and leave the old world stuff behind. We have ethic and national neighborhoods of every kind in the US, but never have I heard of a Albanian neighborhood, Albanian cultural center, Albanian restaurant. I’m sure there is a restaurant somewhere, but it’s struggling. They’ve intentionally sought to integrate, and so I’m all for Albanians coming. If a war breaks out there tomorrow, we will take in all the refugees.
I already explained to you the solution, which is the DNA machine. There will be no need for prostitution, because women will become equally attracted to males and the species will have mental balance, the simultaneous oppression of males on females, and females on males, will cease.
Ah… I see you presume I read all your replies. I don’t speak Tranny, so skip over 90% of your replies, such as your next one in this thread.
There is no such thing as “speaking Tranny”, you cover up your ignorance with lies…presenting outright untruths, presented as truths, that you cannot speak a nonexistent language (which is logically true, but is actually a false concept.) You hope this will tilt the discussion in your favor, since such a technique, of parading one’s ignorance as a strength, is used on shows such as The View and Oprah, typically feminine shows.
I doubt China and Japan would have accepted them, for more or less that reason- among others.
I don’t think it’s racism on the part of the Arabs, I think it’s racism on the part of people who will deny at all costs that Arabs are capable of doing anything wrong.
But the people who think it’s great to admit millions of Arab strangers into a country and racist to oppose it also think it’s racist to expect those Arabs to integrate into Germany culture and ‘cease being Arabs’. Multiculturalism is a big part of what makes immigration so poisonous- these people are going to have plenty of voices telling them that any pressure or inclination they feel to become more German is oppressive.
Yeah. It’s funny, there’s actually a restaurant right here in town run by an Albanian guy, and it’s…just a pizza place. Good pizza, but it’s certainly not ‘ethnic food’. Probably why they went out of business. Hurm.
They were under orders to more or less ignore them.
They handled them the way how the US media would want the police to treat Basketball Americans.
They dindu nuffin’ wrong.
I like it when people say political correctness has gotten out of control, lol.
Racism is bad.
Sexism is bad.
The underlying premises and thinking of such statements is retarded to begin with.
And I do mean retarded in the original sense, appropriate for a child remaining stunted in its development.
But it’s also based on resentment of the strong and identification with and glorification of the weak, the so-called oppressed.
What’s left for such a retarded population but to either get annihilated or join in some new incarnation of fascism.
Good observation, but rather than “remaining”, “having been slowed” was the meaning (acquired after birth).
So, because men can storm a crowd in a flash mob, they are the strong, and the police should look the other way?
The Nietzsche an theory of strength doesn’t even make sense, he is essentially lecturing the strong to allow the less strong to molest the even weaker… wtf? The less strong gets to reorder society, but not the strongest? Police and military is the strongest. They get paid by the weak to do what they want to do, they built that system together. There is no point to debating the rights of the rapists, they clearly aren’t strong enough to go it alone, and no surprise they are hunted afterwards for being a bunch of weak cunts.
A strong man shouldn’t have this much trouble attracting a willing girlfriend in the first place. If he was really worthwhile, he would have women throwing themselves at him. These idiots have to take it by force, and will be dealt with by force.
Huh?
No, it’s because those Non-European men are identified as weak and oppressed so that they are not to be arrested by the strong oppressive police force which is perceived to consist of European men.
And what should have become obvious from observing feminism and who and what it champions, the strong oppressive ones are always European men.
European man is bad (unless they support their own disenfranchising as a group, then they are atoning for their guilt).
‘Racism is bad’ and ‘European man is bad’ is at the core of it.
‘Sexism is bad’ and ‘European man is bad’ is at the core of that understanding as well.
‘Diversity is good’ and more diversity means always less European men.
And less European men means less European women as well in the long run.
There are several things which lead to this self-destructive morality and identity.
One is the oppression inherent in modern social systems which cannot and is not being dealt with by social policies. It is not a policy issue it’s a biological ‘issue’ as a root cause and it’s not a problem to be solved it is something to be understood and lived with in accordance to what reason man can muster.
Another is the rise of the man who takes pride in his weakness, his oppression. Where the key is not the weakness but the taking pride in being weak.
Given the levels of incarceration and way, as one example, the drug war is carried out by ethnicity and neighborhood, the media is failing and radically, in their desire on this issue.
And fuck you for the cute label, asshole.
I hear they weren’t failing in Baltimore and Detroit but that’s not just due to the media.
I also recently heard this from someone else, that they are at least in some areas enforcing the drug laws heavily and severely as a way to control the Basketball Americans, the negroids, the teens, the youths, the blacks.
Btw. I think ‘blacks’ will soon become politically incorrect because of all the half-truths, lies and moral dispossession which is being orchestrated with that identity and the outrage in the population which is growing which will in turn make that label become associated with lots of negativity.
In any case, I’d prefer a more honest and direct way to control them or anyone for that matter. If you gonna oppress someone then do it openly but that’s not feasible today it seems, the more sneaky approach is dominating now.
Speaking of sneaky oppression.
Do you know this meme - “The democrats are the real racists” created by cuckservatives? Yeah, so what. What’s more important is that both of them have been smart and clever enough to throw the white lower social classes under the bus to secure their own standings, socially and economically. Those who are deemed racist are found in places where there is a certain level of diversity, the level where economical and social destruction becomes rampant while those who promote the idea of racism are found in rather homogeneous white or (((white))) communities.
Working towards a Brave New World style utopia.
Asshole… oh you cutie pie, lol.
It’s based on the contempt for morally bankrupt. The mistake that people made is to errenously conclude that just because most of the powerful people are morally bankrupt that power itself is necessarily associated with moral bankrupcy, and that just because most of the powerless people are morally superior that weakness itself is necessarily associated with moral superiority. This was the real mistake. They confused two separate things: power and immorality.
There is no doubt that among oppressed there were those who merely “felt resentment towards their oppressors” in the sense that they merely disliked the idea of being oppressed and not the idea of oppression in general.
There is also no doubt that among such folk there were those who became oppressors of their own kind, far different, and in many cases also far more sophisticated, in their means of oppression than the oppressors they fought against.
But Nietzsche didn’t really understand the problem. He made a mistake. A huge mistake. He played a part in the political backlash that was designed by the Jews to make the Goyim fight against each other.
Racism and sexism are despised not because they are associated with strength, but because they are associated with moral bankrupcy. The idea that anti-racism is associated with resentment towards strength, or glorification of weakness, is promoted by the Jews in order to direct impulsive, weak-willed, far-right bisons (such as yourself) to fight Zionist enemies (e.g. Arabs.)
It’s a gross over-simplification of reality that attracts people who are in desperate need of interpretation of reality of their problems.
There are many possible reasons as to why a man would choose to welcome immigrants. Many of these are ignoble, there is no doubt about that, but at least some of them are noble.
By limiting the possibility space to ignobility what can be achieved is to force the impulsive majority into interpreting human psychology using only ignoble motives. Noble possibilities never enter their picture. As far as they are concerned, they are unreal.
This sort of herding technique is very effective on far-right meatheads whose bodies literally run on adrenaline. The primal nature of their evolution under extremely uncertain circumstances forces them into fight-or-flight mode all of the time, which predisposes them to interpret reality of threat without any hesitation, without any genuine forethought (even when there is some forethought, it’s always lame-ass forethought, for it never escapes, as it cannot escape, the effects of adrenaline, for their lower brain triggers so much adrenaline the PSNS can never dissipate the energy that is created before the cortex takes the turn to decide on action.) So instead of considering the possibility that welcoming immigrants is morally ideal, something that is beautiful in itself, they consider it a weakness employed by “self-destructive” people. Notice the term “self-destructive”? It is a tell as to how much dominated they are by instinct of self-preservation. The cowards – for anyone who is dominated by instinct of self-preservation is a coward – are inverting the reality by calling men of courage cowards for not willing to surrender to the instinct of self-preservation (to be cowards.)
Herders can take advantage of this by overcrowding reality with stories of ignobility. By promoting the development of ignobility in all of its directions they can create the mind numbing impression that people are fundamentally ignoble and that nothing can be done about it other than to go with the flow i.e. to become ignoble so that ignobility becomes tolerable.
The reason anti-immigrants are despised is not because they are strong, but because they are morally bankrupt. They are depised because they are hedonists who are dominated by instinct of self-preservation.
The world wars were about the noble superman and the “sneaky” invisible man. The invisible man won. Thus…
Yes, they consider racism to be morally bad.
Fifty years ago the same kind of people considered homosexuality to be morally bad.
Now some think it is morally good to tell those German women that they better get used to those men who raped them.
This is an understanding of morality where ideals are divorced from real objectives, where ‘racism is bad’ becomes an empty unreflected reflex without an understanding of what it promotes and in which social and demographic situation it will affect a society in which ways.
They probably do that, just like many people have been taught to assume that ugly people are usually more good-natured than pretty people. (the opposite is arguably the case).
But so far that’s about how they justify their feelings to themselves. One argument for them to be recited among many. The more interesting question is why they feel the way they feel.
Let’s assume this is the case and not just a theory you have been taught by Jews who call themselves the-real-Aryan-deal and who lead you into the abyss right now. I’m confident in you having considered that possibility.
So are you saying Nietzsche’s mistake was that he should have written some other random crap because what he actually wrote was exploited by Jews(?) to propagate Goyim fighting Goyim?
It’s more complicated than that, right?
Any-way, I’m more interested in whether it’s accurate what Nietzsche says about the Goyim, about modern man’s resentment because I think that the Jews can come up with their own schemes without the writings of Nietzsche about making Goyim fight Goyim or someone else.
Jesus, moral bankruptcy again. Yes… and why is morality what it is, today? What’s underneath it…
You know, for someone who stops at ‘moral bankruptcy’ and doesn’t ask why we have the morality we have you are very eager to see the impulsive, weak-willed, bison in others. To not be impulsive in effect requires to be the judge of our behaviour beyond the noetic wall of moral platitudes. And with platitudes I am not thinking about your ‘moral bankruptcy’ but about ‘racism is bad’.
Here’s the deal:
Neocohens calling fly-over country to arms to provide ground troops and tax money to invade Iraq is probably not a smart, self-enlightened-interested idea to follow suit.
Welcoming Arabs to your neighbourhood may gonna help the cucks in the short run, or so they could reason but it’s a pretty self-destructive idea for those lower on the cucked scale.
Is that a plea for me to write text walls so that you get more information for the shredder in your head to analyze?
Keep the limey manners to yourself.
In a way…
An article from “Die Welt”, 17.01.2016, a report of a woman who is working at a preliminary reception centre for refugees in Hamburg. She started her work very enthusiastically a few months ago, now she thinks about quitting her job. Here’s the translation.