The new world order - musings, sketchbook

Marx, Luther and Hobbs were primarily responsible fir the uncertainty predicated to Spengler’s and Shopenhauer’s pessimism.

The romantic ideal under siege could not be revived sleigh of hand, so Nietzsche had literally to kill the gods, in order to teburtn the old tragedies, so that literal optics could still entertain the overfed populace.

So much for the west.

The east, nurtured in an inconsequential aura of inauthentic simulation, reared in the sheepleness of servitude, felt comfort and security in that.

The overthelrow of the ancient regime changed all that in less then 50 years. and the violence associated with that, caused violance between regions, ideologies and empires, the aftershocks of which conflated the various cause and effects into the philosophical compression that Hobbs complained about.

Meanwhile, such compression was universalized by europe, where the trident of social, ethical and artisic-phenomenal crunches similarly popped up.

Now they call them bubbles.

This trident did have an underlying substantial political presence, as the Ddyfus affair was attested ti, prior to the great empire breakups affecting everything from style to human relatipna, and modern absurdusts point to the regression of reason, preempting the existential despair spoken freely at a time when romantic impressions were morphing into vulgar expressions of protest.

Luther’s moral outrage was later ethically subverted by the great outbreAk against the ancien. regime, and hegel dreamed the outrage in political frameworks, trying to rescucutate the spirit in conventional terms.

The world wars were cataclysmic events that didn’t solve the underlying issues, and the nation was always remained the developing state of an ideal that had been eternally inscubed between. The ancient bind between a universal, Catholic morally vested authority, and it’s earthly vestiges of imperum
The trace if that city state, was restated by saint augustine, but progression needed to rebel against that, as a kind if after thought to unbind it from any subversubversive reaction.

Luther’s rebellion against moral aauthority unhinged the political e this that Hegel tried to protect, and the casualties followed in incrementally increasing rates of casualties.

Nietzsche had to kill the gods, because there appeared no longer any popular support fir them in the consciousness if the upcoming proletiate ethic. They became a nuisance.

The trident became a potential weapon, rraised from under the sea, of the unconscious anger of those previous cutey state dwellers , enimating from under the delicatelay focused creatures that gave birth to the goddess of live, aphrodite. the universal city state had lost it’s athena protector,
the trident of the underground, could no longer envisage her birth from down in the depths.

Marx changed all that, forging an unknown socially adhesive metallic compound out of the golden strands of fleece that were spinned for the king, the rheingold of the past gave way to the real crunch of demystification of past’s bards.

The national and the social interests were amalgamated for the conveviencr of those who sought to extend the work ethic, of the guild systems of ages old city states, into a universal ethic, overturning Christian moral requiraments , intrinsic in prior identifiable sets of human relations.

It was merely a convenient and supposedly natural development forged out of competing Christian and humanistic conflicts, but a convenience later turned into a requirement.

The squeeze became obvious, when the effects could no longer be recognized in either terms, and the effect became no ideal synthesis.

Marx saw this and transformed the conflicting elements into non causeal, but effected terms.

The classes did not define the outcome it was they who?were defined by them

The revisionists believed in the optical illusion of changes of rhetoric could exemplify the pen as mightier than the sword. The printing press started the revolution, as did Luther, and the need to colonize the increasing population ofEuropeab cuvilization, who’se need for new space was increasing by leaps and bounds.

So capital became needed to finance the expeditions, where be worlds could be found to convenience the malthusuan explosion

Soengler saw the futility of all this, and a pessimism arose in the center of civilization asascribed to by a sad goethe, in his Buddhic apologist schopenhauer.

This meltdown of the antromorphic center of the universe, could not be unbound, any more, it had to release the foundemental restraints that atlas himself had instituted, and a new man, had to ne created by the same archaic energized that sought refuge in?submission and reason.

Marx put class conscious irresolute put to the rest to form out of the pro or curry stated accomoditation to the ancient regime, but surprisingly, the materially enslaved but spiritually secured sheeples, were rouses out of their twilight sleep , rebel roused into their mistake of identifying with the false mystical spiritual world into their material counterparts.

They awoke en-muss from their slumbers, and action became the new tool of social change, and their mystically meditative states were shaken to the core. The west was won over from the east, Peter the great saw to it.
The nation state grew into a siciak-metaphysical hybrid with the atrophy if the metaphysical liberated by a new compression of the social welfare of the nation by an easy revisionist trick.

Engels did the job, and it was put into a neat formula where the ideal state was forged out of progressive social forces which simulated Christian ethics.

And the rheingold was stilen, which was really the spirit of man.

This was not really a German or a Jewish ’ invention’ nor was a metamorphoses foreseen by mystics such as Nietzsche.

It was the result of a natural turn of events, where a center field, a free-space had to accommodate intetnally, the need for outward expansion.

The same occured with finding a spiritual accommodation to the materially manifested need with the social optics of the older crumbling social empire of the roman empire. The identity politics of the prior city state citizen needed new inter personal possibilities, to explore a new boundery of spatially elevated sight that nee horizons could glean from a totally flatly limited view.

Such views were pulp fictional narratives by Jules Verne and others.

Reactionaries delimited such illusionary optical possibilities into the conventional descriptions of historical anecdotes and poesy, whereby they were tried to accommodate the new revisions t programs into the unfreeze spaces of the imaginative unconscious.

BUT were such ‘freizes’ a necessary or a convenient effects of a repressed aesthetic accomodation? Were the nation states , especially those which became to transpire nei-objectively posed, hystorically prepossesses models, par excellence, put into morally binding frames of reference, into positions of service as sacrificially created types in the service of a universal categorical necessity?

Did the old pluralistic gids view with the one, as a regression to absurd decompression, that needed a primal reason for self sacrifice, reversely anthropomorpomorphically speaking to self sacrafice?

This by way if the age old universal litmus test between the actual ‘is’ and the should be ‘ought’?

Is this kind of revision that interpreted Marx saw in Engels’ interpretation of having to actually the need to change history?

This is remeniscent of Darwin’s view of human evolution to the degree that there need be cohesion between interpretation on all fronts.

These musings just lead to the most credible belief in the retrograde development" even up to the present time of the most uncertain and newest of all of what has been called a science, that of psychology and social psychology. That philosophy grew propechy into corresponding theoretical methods of probable effects, giving rise to is much waste of human life at phenomenal rates of terrible waste, questions the validity of such credible relations between prediction, theory, supposition and formative uncontrollable effects. Old models of scapegoating have not lost their unpredictable and necessary blood letting needs for the so called universal social, humanistic benifit.

We are and always have been objects in test tubes, being weighed for and against the most sought after and leaf damaging reasonable state.

Is that the necessity that The Brave New World is concerned with?

(Haven’t read it, only excerpts of it)

Editing required.