The one without the identities which are common to all ...

[stellamonika]

Why can’t the following statements be refuted?

1. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be analyzed.
2. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be created.
3. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be discovered.
4. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be comprehended.
5. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be modeled.
6. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be judged.
7. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be unified.
8. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be questioned.
9. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be studied.
10. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be communicated.
11. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be predicted.
12. The one without the identities which are common to all is meaningless.
    Why can’t the these statements be refuted?

[brevel_monkey]

12. ‘The one without the identities which are common to all’ is meaningless.

Why can’t the these statements be refuted?

because meaningless statements don’t have truth conditions. They are neither true nor false - just an arrangement of sounds and letters.

In the same way you can’t ‘refute’ the noise a rusty gate makes when it’s blowing in the wind…

[namelesss]

@stellamonika

Why can’t the following statements be refuted?

1. The one without the identities which are common to all cannot be analyzed.

’
If an identity is common to all, there cannot be one without.
As said, nonsense.
Nonsense is not refuted, it is made into laws and head stuffing for politicians!

[namelesss]

@brevel_monkey

In the same way you can’t ‘refute’ the noise a rusty gate makes when it’s blowing in the wind…

A squirt of WD-40 ‘refutes’ the squeaky gate hinges very nicely!