0 is a concept, an image, contextual, so it is still, something.
…a false vacuum, a negative space, something that attracts your eye because you expected what is not there.
Don’t mind me …just vibing.
My definition of “Nothing” is no form, no content, nothing.
My definition of Space is “form without content”, 3D, Euclidean space.
True nothingness is no consciousness, no “concept” of 0, no nothing.
you can understand the concept of there not being any consciousness in the world.
You just can’t “experience it”.
Conceptualize means to understand the concept of… experience of the thing is not required.
I’m not a doctor, I can’t help with anything.
The “Forum System” warned that you should not conduct a dialogue with animals and try to make a human out of them. Animals are protected by laws and regulations, they must remain animals.
Except it totally can virtual particals are constantly poping in and out of existence at the base of reality according to quantum mechanics. Nothing can become something in this reality
Youre just lovely arnt you
1 Like
Anyone who doesn’t agree with his convoluted definitions is nothing more than animal.
Even his definition of animal is convoluted.
Most of his definitions confuse the mind and obscure the truth.
they spawn from the ZPE, which means Zero Point Energy. It has energy. It didn’t have Zero Energy. Zero Point Energy is not Zero Energy. Zero Point Energy means 0 Kelvin Temperature, not Zero Energy.
1 Like
Which cannot be thought of otherwise it becomes a concept, and is something.
Yes and a concept is still /something/. True nothingness is not able to be fathomed or thought of, it’s an impossibility because the moment you think you do, it becomes something and not true nothingness.
I agree with you. It’s impossible for nothing to exist because the word exist is a verb and there are no floating actions. And I agree with you that existence is necessary, not contingent. To be is to be necessary. In order to be contingent, existence would have to be contingent on something that exists. It’s an arbitrary bifurcation of the most fundamental concept: existence.
The first cause is nature itself, or identity. The types of actions an entity can perform are determined by the entity’s nature or identity. Looked at this way, the big bang is not causeless but a derivative of identity. What cause the universe to expand from a much hotter, denser state? The nature of that hot, dense universe caused it. Given what it was, it had to act in the way it did. Its actions were necessary.
Virtual particles don’t pop into existence from nothing but from a quantum field. Quantum fields exist, they are not nothing.
1 Like
We can conceptualize it only in relation to something, as a negation, but not as an actual existent.
I am not talking about literal particles. I am talking about nothingness as a concept. It can’t be conceptualized because then it is not true nothingness. There is no context = image, for true nothingness. It cannot be actually thought of or about, just like we can’t grasp an infinity because of its nature of being infinite.
A thought, is still /something/, an idea, anything that gives context = image, is something and not true nothingness.
Anything that we think of and assign it as “nothing”, is still actually something and not true nothingness.
If all matter were to disappear into the multiple glassy holes at the centre of all the galaxies from which it all came then what would be left is multiple glassy holes with N and S poles residing within electromagnetic fields which reside in space.
SELF is separate from vibrating matter and interprets the varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves emitted from it.
You would be left with space, which is still something… lmao
True nothingness is not able to be pinpointed, thought of or comprehensible. Just like an infinity, it is its polar opposite.
Absolute nonsense Artimas.
When matter disappears into a single glassy hole at the centre of a galaxy then we know that the electromagnetic field associated with that particular glassy hole remains because the glassy hole still spins and has an N and S pole.
So, if all matter disappears into the multiple glassy holes at the centre of all the individual galaxies then all the electromagnetic fields associated with all those individual galaxies will also remain because these electromagnetic fields are not tied to matter.
Come on Artimas…use a bit of common sense.
This is precisely why cosmology and particle physics has totally failed because scientists don’t have any common sense.They are incapable of thinking rationally because they are driven by their incorrect starting philosophy that makes them blind to actual reality science.
They are constantly trying to fit a square peg science into a round hole science and getting nowhere.
It’s called insanity science.
Most of these scientists even view themselves as a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).
Surely that should tell you all you need to know about these scientists.
Humans can conceptualize death.
You don’t need an “image”, or an “experience”, to understand the concept of something. Otherwise how could an “alive” person understand what death is??
You want the conversation to go nowhere. You want to say that nobody is even able to understand the concept of things.