So, ugly not wanting standards of quality to not be based on beauty? Do you realize that you just said that ugly want standards of quality to be based on beauty?
My point was that the ugly ones don’t want the standards of quality to be based on beauty, which I think was your point too. So where’s the misunderstanding?
Also, not all feminists are ugly.
That would be a solution if the only ones involved were the bouncers and the watchers.
But the watchers go out in the world and treat non-bouncers as objects.
Why would that be a better claim? Art is completely subjective anyway, did you see what passes for modern art? Art is whatever you find aesthetically appealing, period.
I’m sure that girl in the gif doesn’t want attention, that must be why she’s jiggling them in front of the camera 
ah sry typo. but u kinda sad to point at it 
Ofc a gene. but also dep on the defi, i wouldnt say everyone who claims to be a feme just is one, and there other be qualification for me at least. But lets hear it wat is urs? defi of femi dat is.
Total nonsense. There has always been an accepted aesthetic set by artists.
Are you semi-illiterate? You don’t understand half the stuff that I write. :-"
You’re right, a bunch of people sharing a similar subjective opinion totally makes that opinion objectively true. Wait a minute 
I thought that by “bullshit” you meant unwanted attention. Did I miss your point?
Who said objective?
There’s a bunch of people who set the standard for aesthetics. Not everything/anything is beautiful. No everything/anything is art. Shocking?
They don’t want to be approached in a certain way. They don’t want a sexist, condescending social interaction. Seems fairly reasonable to me.
The problem is not the bouncing breasts GIF. The problem is that young men tend to come up to a woman and treat her as though she is a pair of bouncing breasts.
I agree with Phyllo that art/beauty is not " In the eye of the beholder ", that there is a general agreement of what’s aesthetic and what’s not. Most people, probably, find Taylor Swift to be beautiful. Sure, there are probably some who find her not so appealing, but an even smaller minority who find her ugly. Like I said, there’s a general concurrence of what is beautiful, and it has to do with symmetry.
Whether or not young men tend to come up to woman and treat them like mere bouncing tits is immaterial; this is about the aesthetic value of the mentioned knockers.
A bunch of people find something aesthetically appealing for some reasons. I’m fine with that. What I’m not fine is with claiming that those standards are objective, because they’re nothing more than a sum of subjective standards.
Art is anything that a person finds aesthetically appealing. So yes, anything is potentially art and whether something is art or not depends purely on the subject perceiving it.
That I agree with. But that’s not a reason to prohibit people from admiring a nice pair.
For some of course there is aesthetic value in watching a horse take a shit. It is all entirely subjective. Well, apart from whatever particular consensus any particular one of us can muster from any particular others.
Of course watching a horse take a shit isn’t as likely to generate as much political turbulence as ubermen transfixed by tits bouncing up and down.
On the other hand, scatology does appall some folks more than others.
Oh well, we never quite seem able to pin these things down. You know, philosophically.
That’s a rare and morbid fixation, whereas appreciating the form and symmetry of a woman’s bosoms is natural, healthy, and more universal.
To even try to juxtapose the two is unscrupulous.
There are evolutionary reasons why busty females are preferred over non-busty females, and it has something to do with fertility.
I’m sure I’ll have a point to make when I’ve ceased to be hypnotized by the gif in the OP.
Haha I understand; they are very talismanic.
I think that the critical point here is breasts vs bouncing breasts.
It is acknowledged that we can appreciate the beauty of breasts in a more detached, aesthetic way. Even women, in an entirely non sexual approach, are able to do appreciate breasts.
But why are bouncing breasts so particularly alluring and instinctively understood as sexual?
Come on, as though the politics of gender isn’t written all over this. Or perhaps we should settle it once and for all and have Satyr pronounce judgment on it. The moderators can grant him a one time exemption as it were.
On the other hand, Lys isn’t banned is she? We can always wait for her to resolve it.
Because it reminds us guys of what they look like during sex.
Breasts are good as long as the rest of the body is good.
It’s ok to be flat chested, as long as you’re skinny. No one wants a fat girl with no tits.
It’s ok to have big tits, as long as you’re skinny. No one wants a fat girl with big tits.
It’s like when a person tells me, “oh dude this one coming over is a hottie, she’s got ass for days…”. It just makes me think, “Great, a fattie. I’ve gotta get outta here”.
Think about a girl with a big beer belly taking up close shots of her face and posting them online with her fat tits shoved together. Then in real life she’s just a fat bitch with saggy tits. It’s total nonsense.
These women know if they’re hot or not, and most of them will do anything to try and trick you into thinking they’re hot so long as they don’t actually have to go to the gym. Push up bras, tight shirts that are loose at the bottom, strategically angled pictures to prevent you from seeing the gut. It’s shameful.
I think about the girl I’m messing with right now. 5’2, 110 lbs or so, and 34Ds. She has the exact same dimensions as a girl I dated a while back, except the other one didn’t have the boob job. I never thought less of the one without tits, she was a very pretty girl. She used to yearn for tits back in the day and I’d say, “if you want em, sure, but you don’t need em”.
Now, after messing with the same body + the tits, I look back and think, “man, I shoulda got that other girl a set of these because they’re amazing”.
I know…I know…everyone wants to judge fake tits and say they’re hard and don’t feel natural or don’t look good, but I think most of that is based on old data about old tit technology. They’ve come so far. These new fake tits are just amazing. It’s like you never know they’re fake until you squeeze too hard and the girl says, “you’re gonna pop it”. Then I dunno why, but you get a nice sense of gratification.
Don’t ask me to justify anything I’ve said here…this is all stream of consciousness stuff.
So basically nobody wants a fattie of any sort.
Jesus, you are not being ironic here, are you? You actually do think like this?! 
Very few people would pick an overweight woman if there were 10 women in front of them that they could freely pick from and only 1 was overweight.