The polar-eternal reality map [mind is as real as energy] ~ literally.
How can mind info and matter contain a greater aggregate (of realness) if they are all interchangeable? If an element of one does not transmigrate or otherwise become the other in some manner, how can information about them occur?
[size=85]jump[/size]
What is energy in stopped time? Where there is no movement (given that all particles move and energy is denoted by the existence of particles), there is no energy. Does energy only exist when time does ~ when there is movement and objects are manifest.
What I am getting at here is an idea that there is a valueless essentiality to all things, this statelessness (probably does not itself contain any manner of essence info or meaning ~ that would not be stateless surely) seems to be a medium of transferral and also an eternity (in the sense that stopped time at least is eternal, perhaps also in terms of timelessness).
What we have then is a reality entirely composed of transmigratable and changeable elements, as opposed to any idea of solidity ~ of one thing being ‘real’ and another element being less real. In this reality map information and mind are as real as matter/objects notably because none have any essential substance, their aggregate is born out of comparisons and of perceived effects. For example we may think that hitting our head on a rock makes the rock more real than the effect in thought of that event, yet naturally it is the thought we feel, not the rock.
Essentially there are no edges to things, thus where we denote there is a thing of some description, then there’s nothing between it and another thing. All ‘things’ and all contents of those things are potentially and essentially amorphous, they only keep their shape - so to say, until something commands them to do otherwise.
Objects obey information.
Information is resultant of objects
Mind changes information
Mind objects and information understand one another - I state. They do this (or its their native state) because there is no essential difference/cardinality to them and they are all contained within one another. However this statement is denied as the ‘containment’* varies according to the relationships between one amorphous ‘entity’ and another (e.g. mental object, meaning, info, and other objects like matter).
*containment here relates to that which defines an object as an object and an information, thought or other entity as themselves.
I am wondering if there is a ‘sweet-spot’ in the progression of one universe to the next where all the aspects in the equation ‘know’ one another. That all states are the denial (spoke of above) of such a union, that all stopped time events originate in this as the eternal and shall inevitably draw the universe back into that point of union where eternity exists.
- From the mountain of eternity we shall look down, and behold the whole plain spread before us. Down here we get lost and confused in the devious valleys that run off from the rdots of the hills everywhere, and we cannot make out where the streams are going, and what there is behind that low shoulder of the hill yonder. But when we get to the summit peak and look down, it will all shape itself into one consistent whole, and we shall see it all at once. Thomas Boston -
One would imagine that that eternity is in actual fact ‘always there’ as the basis of everything else, perhaps this is that from which particles exist, disappear and reappear.
An interesting and spiritual [of mind] aspect of that for me is; how do we get from stopped emptiness to a somethingness in motion! How do we get from eternity to existence, from nirvana to Samsara. It seems there is always a set of relationships occurring and that statelessness is never fully arrived at, indeed that eternity only exists because of that!
Reality it seems is rather elastic, even up to a point where an iron rod is interchangeable with its information, eternity with the hour and infinity can really be held in the palm of ones hand.
- Eternity is in love with the productions of time. ~ William Blake -
, if I do.