I have a few days and here I am…
Philosophy always has to have a starting point…
We can have a multitude of starting points…But human
beings have but one starting point, and that is of needs…
and in this idea of needs, what is/should be the ending point or
goal? what is the step after our needs are met?
We get a sense of that by the ones/human beings we value
and build statues to… and that would be the Gandhi’s, MLK,
Goethe, Shakespeare’s of the world… and what is the lesson
learned from these thinkers and writers? one way to look at
it is that this is a question of morality, ethics…
How are we to treat others? As I have noted in my ‘‘Ich und Du’’
thread, that by treating people as ‘‘Du’’, we treat them
as fellow human beings, with respect and dignity and
tolerance…in other words, we treat people with value…
and that is morality/ethics within du… we treat others as
human beings with needs… and the point of existence is
to fulfill those needs… but what is, what is the next step
after our needs are fulfilled? It isn’t enough to fulfill our needs,
we must take the next step…
the next question becomes the question of a Zero Sum Game…
America today is playing the Zero Sum Game… in a Zero
Sum Game is where all participants are in direct opposition…
opposed to each other… but that sounds very familiar…
Hobbes ‘‘State of Nature’’ where the ‘‘State of Nature’’
is a lawless, chaotic, violent war of all against all,
where life is ‘‘Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’’
I am in competition with the others in my state/society
for the resources I need to survive… and that is almost
a perfect description of capitalism… both a Zero Sum Game
and Hobbes ‘‘State of Nature’’
One does note that much of the ‘‘needs’’ of our modern day
American is manufactured by advertising and the media…
the American dream of a house in the burbs, with two kids
and a dog name Rouf… that ‘‘dream’’ was a manufactured
by those who would profit from that dream…
In reality, we human beings can get by with extremely
few goods/things… we can survive without a car or a house
or fame, money, titles, material goods or power…
What are the bottom line necessities of being human?
Air, food, water, shelter, education and health care…
and the human being need, unlike other animals,
psychological needs, such as safety/security, esteem,
a sense of belonging, love ( love is the one thing that
has both a psychological need and a physical need)
the thing about being human is that we must meet our
needs, or we are no longer human… we become
animal… animals are unable to escape or change from
their own instincts… a dog cannot be anything but a dog…
it must do dog things… as is a cat… but a human being,
they are not as limited as animals… we have both
possibilities and we have choice…
My own choices have changed as I have grown older…
I can no longer run or play sports, as I did as a kid/young
adult, but I have other possibilities I can seek out…
for example, I can seek out the possibility of me becoming
a great philosopher… that is still possible for me, while
running a 4-minute mile is no longer possible for me…
I cannot backpack as I once did, but I can travel…
I can relearn German, as I intend to do once I retire…
that is still possible for me…
but animals, they don’t have possibilities as human beings do…
a dog can only be a dog, it isn’t possible for a dog to
have other possibilities as human beings do…
and what is possible for me, changes as I have grown older..
physically, mentally, psychologically, philosophically…
but our physical needs changes as does our
psychological needs change… I no longer seek out
validations that once drove me as a young man…
like me, dislike me, hate me, love me, at this point,
I don’t really care… it is no longer a need I seek to
have validated for me…Our physical/bodily needs
also change as we age… I don’t eat anywhere near
as much as I used to, I have changed how much
water I now drink, I have changed my diet and how
I exercise… we have to adapt and change our needs
as we grow older… life is, at its heart, a series
of adaptations and changes that we must navigate in
order to meet our needs… and the question becomes,
what happens after our needs are met?
We should engage with the possibilities that exists
within us…or as Nietzsche said, ‘‘To become who we are’’…
but that leads us to ‘‘Ich und Du’’… to be treated as ‘‘Du’’
and not ‘‘es’’ other, we must help others become who
they are… as we attempt to become who we are…
to achieve our possibilities… the two ideas are connected…
to become who we are and the seeking out our possibilities…
therein lies the next step after achieving our own needs,
to achieve/become who we are and we do that by
seeking out our possibilities…
to seek out what is possible for us to achieve…
and the damaging idea of seeking out the trinkets
of existence, how does seeking out fame or titles,
or power, or material goods, help us become who we are?
How does seeking out material goods help us find out
what is possible for us… or how does fame help us
become who we are? to become our possibilities?
does the way we treat people, to treat them as ‘‘Du’’ instead
of ‘‘Es’’, how does that help us, help them? it allows others
to become who they are, by treating them as
‘‘es’’, which is other… which denies people their right to
become who they are… to treat people as ‘‘es’’ is
to deny them their own becoming who they are and
deny them their own possibilities… for making people
‘‘es’’ is to force others into becoming something they
are not… it is the denial of ‘‘du’’ when we force
people to be ‘‘es’’…
so, what is the moral/ethical thing to do, as a human
being? to treat others as ‘‘du’’ and not as ‘‘es’’,
this allows human beings the chance to become who
they are, instead of becoming who I demand they must be…
by treating people as ‘‘du’’ we allow people not only to
become who they are, but to engage with, seek out
their own possibilities… which is exactly what I want
for myself… to become who I am and to seek out
what is possible for me… and that is the goal, to
allow others the choice, possibility to become who they
are, on their own terms, not on mine…
to seek out what is possible for them, on their own
terms, and not on my terms… to treat others as
‘‘du’’ and not as ‘‘es’’ which to define others
as I decide, not as they decide…
What is possible for you? what choices do you have?
how does one become who they are? All of this is
possible if, if we treat others as ‘‘du’’ and not ‘‘es’’…
Kropotkin
