On racialism
Racialism recognises the simple truth that it is only through the preservation of our race can we touch eternal life.
Principles
-
Racialism is not racism
-
Racialism recognise the existence of the race.
-
Racialism recognise the continuation of the race as the ultimate goal for an individual’s existence.
Explanation
- Racialism is not racism
The doctrine of racialism is sharply distinct from the dogma of racism in that racism as advocated by Adolf in his Mein Kampf is a system of belief that elevates one race above the other, and that the elevated race be designated the title of superior race. And that the superiority of a race is solely dependant upon its achievement, thus just as achievement varies from the ages, racial superiority upon which it is based also wavers from age to age. This raise the obvious question whether race is an absolute concept that can not be shaken. Race is an eternal concept, thus any superiority upon which it is based must be eternal, thus the achievement of one race must necessarily outweigh the other consistently. However, history offers the best counter example to such claim. The ancient Egyptians are undoubtly technically superior to the Nordics, thus superior to the nordics in the field of achievement, therefore they must be designated racially superior. But as time bear witness, the nordic rose to become masters of the planet and rose to the position of superiority. Does the racial superiority of the Egyptians all of a sudden vanish? How could racial superiority vanish all of a sudden if racial superiority is supposedly eternal superiority. Thus we can claim that superiority depending on achievement is temporary superiority, and any superiority which has its foundation built upon achievement is not eternal. One must necessarily ask oneself, how can the ancient Egyptians be superior racially hundreds of years ago and racially inferior now? Race does not change so speedily so one can only conclude racism in terms of racial superiority which base its foundation principle on achievement is unfounded.
Therefore, racism presuppose a false concept. Racialism on the other hand, is distinct from racism on all levels. It does base its principles on shakable grounds such as technological invention, but on a common love of one’s own people and at the same time recognising an individual’s responsibility towards his people, and that by reason and by truth, all the thoughts and actions of an individual is factually speaking based on the need to serve the race, in essence to preserve its existence.
- Racialism recongise the existence of the race
2.1 Race and its existence
The human ability to mate and produce off-spring gives testimony to human existence. But that in itself does not imply the non-existence of races. If according to the argument that since race can mix and produce off-spring then race does not exist. Then if people of different age can mate and produce off-spring then age does not exist. The race like age is a part of the human identity that helps to divide human beings from universal human suffrage down to individualistic particulars. The ability to mate only means humans are of one species, and there are many characteristics of men. If all men are human beings, then why do all men have individual finger prints, don’t that in itself disprove the unity of humanity, and breaks it down into particulars?
The personal identity is a question of facial characteristics. One recognise the other most readily by observing facial characteristics. Though all human have a nose, eyes, ears, lips, there is no such thing as a human nose, eye or ear without a racial element being attached to it. If we take the simple instance of the eye. Eastern asian have slant eyes, whites have sunken eyes, and blacks have protruding eyes. On top of that, all black people have hair curled in a particular way that no other people have, that in itself is a distinguishing characteristic or salient feature of Africa. The White is distinct from the Asians in that Asians have protruding eyes while the white have eye balls hidden in their sunken sockets. Besides the obvious difference in natural skin color, the races can be recognised from the above criteria.
2.2 Will and success
As given above, there is no racial superiority based on achievement, so all achievement comes about as a result of the will to work and determination and perseverance. An individual ought never be lazy, but always work hard and preserver. The successful is the individual with the greatest will. Thus all achievements are a reflection of the will and not of the race.
- Racialism recognise the continuation of the race as the ultimate goal for an individual’s existence.
For something to be human, it must fall within the existing racial category. This means a man identical in all respect to another being but only different in having a blue skin, then the being can not be designated human status. A profound implication follows that to be human is to belong to an existing race. Any beings that a result of cross breed can not be deemed truely human for they do not belong to the existing races, and are like the blue skinned man, not man.
It is beyond doubt that the race exist, and that each of us, as human beings belongs to it. The meaning of human is composed of the original three races, so any interbreeding that result in the creation of a new race does not satisfy the criteria of human existence which is dependant upon membership in the three original races. So a mixed being is strictly not human.
For is we are to assign human characteristics to mixed beings would be a lie. It can be said that a mixed being can speak, but so can an intelligent parrot, that does not make it a human being. The human criteria is composed of only and entirely the beings which belong to the three races, which are properly named human.
The mixed being does not resemble any existing criteria of humanity, namely the races which compose humanity, so to mix is also to erase a being’s human existence which is dependant upon the existence of the races.
Also, it matters not how the resultant off-spring re-mix, the original is lost forever, and its racial and human existence is ended by its own stupidity.
The race in relation to eternal life is clear. The race is passed down through the ages, from our ancestors which are all racially homogenous beings, and thus they derive us, as their homogenous equal. It is a biological certainty that if we mix, we would produce a mixed non-human offspring, but if we embrace our racial instinct and marry within the race, it is equally beyond doubt that we would produce racially homogenous beings like our ancestors whom produced us. So it is through the race, that our ancestors have survived, this is a racial line by which continuation lead to everlasting life.
The racial instinct means that we are close to one another on a purely human level but we are even closer on the racial level. One belongs to one’s body, so it would be acting against one’s instinct to betray one’s own interest, for example, helping someone else at the expense of oneself. But one also belongs to a race, which is composed of racial equivalent of one self, so to help some other race is to betray one’s racial instinct. The racial instinct is the instinct of self-continuation namely the race.
The paternal love is racial love. It is an expression of the racial instinct. The child is unproductive, but the parents love it nonetheless, so the love can not be of what the child can provide, materially, so the love is the love of what the child have. The parents see in the child a continuation of its race, just the forefathers before them. The love is a racial love, for in the child, they see their own racial continuation. Mix offspring is not human, so just as it is possible to love a dog, it is also possible to love the mixed animal.
