news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u … 963390.jpg
-Imp
I saw her face when Bush mentioned that his dad’s friendship with Clinton. It was great!
She seems like a hate filled person.
Avert your eyes, she may take on other forms!
HOLY HELL
Oh for hell’s sake. Let’s follow any of you around with a camera every time you step out the door. Wanna bet your expressions are always going to be sweetness and light? Imp, stop trolling…
JT
Imp, please.
I’m eating here.
Why is it that super smart women, like Hillary, who was making more than hubby as a lawyer, raise so many male hackles. 
Feeling threatened boys. 
it isn’t the fact that she is a woman… it is the fact that she is stalin in a dress…
-Imp
She appears humorless to me.
Her being female is beside the point, I’d dislike her just as much if she were male…
I respect good female politicians, I loathe the bad ones for allowing themselves to become puppets for the politically correct. The present Education Secretary in this country is a prime example of a woman who has clearly got into that position because she is a woman rather than because she is particularly talented. These days there’s pressure on the govt. to have more female Cabinet Ministers so they tend to appoint boring, weak women who will happily be manipulated by those around them and fulfill their role as ‘part of the quota’.
On the other hand you’ve got Mo Mowlam, one of the best parliamentary politicians of her generation. She, along with Robin Cook, died last year and both were, at least in the view of many commentators, a tremendous loss to British politics.
Hello F(r)iends,
SIATD, I object! That’s a man!!!
Actually, it’s an actor known as Philip Seymour Hoffman.
He recently starred in the movie Capote as old T-man himself…
Besides, Mo is a bartender’s name. 'Nough said.
-Thirst
You’re right. And she supports the Republican foreign policy.
That should tell you something.
And the picture is HIL-arious!
I know many people who have not gotten jobs because of affermative action (political correctness), but not one person who has. Therefore I am against affermative action.
Come on, think about that! If she got the job because she was a woman that’s just another form of splitting the ticket. Why people get so upset when anyone who isn’t a white male gets into power, I will never understand.
Very few politicians are competent people. Saying they only got the job because of their race/gender/ect. is just plain silly. They got the job because of nepotism that runs rampant in any political system. They’re incompetent because that’s the way most people are.
LOL
sure she does… she acts as if she supports it to fool the “moderates” into voting for her…
-Imp
Honestly Imp, do you think the current Republican foreign policy of reckless interventionism is a moderate policy?
Or are you saying that Hilary is trying to attract moderate Republicans who are actually extremists when it come to their foreign policy?
You know, we both seem to disagree a lot, but if I could pick one man to be President, I’d pick Ron Paul.
What do you think of him?
I don’t see bush’s foreign policy as “reckless” or “interventionism”…
ron paul is an excellent choice…
“Government exists to protect liberty, not to redistribute wealth or to grant special privileges.” -from his site
-Imp
It is debatable whether it is reckless or not, but how can you honestly say his foreign policy isn’t an interventionist one? That is an undisputable fact.
Well he thinks Bush’s foreign policy is both reckless and interventionist.
no, it isn’t interventionist… but perhaps you feel our foreign policy against germany and japan were interventionist as well…
-Imp
LOL, so you’re equating the decision to go to war with Iraq with the decision to enter WWII?
Being attacked and then going to war with the country who attacked you is not interventionist. That’s a defensive war. That’s what WWII was.
We only entered WWII because we were attacked by Japan; one of the axis powers…
So you see, since Iraq never attacked us, it wasn’t a defensive war. It was an offensive war and that would fall under the category of interventionism.
Personally, I’d love to see you make a in-depth comparison between the Iraq War and WWII. You know they do have a lot in common; I mean they were both wars.
this current conflict is a defensive war as well…
you will not believe it until we drag the iraqi wmds out of syria and I don’t need to argue that again…
the point is, why did we not immediately get out of japan and germany when we had destroyed their militaries? they were no longer a threat…
we erected new governements in both countries as we are doing in iraq and afghanistan…
and we will erect a new government in iran as well…
-Imp