# The Riddle of Evolution Solved!

The Riddle of Evolution Solved!

1. If the big bang is true and it happened only once, then the combination of laws of physics and and the quirk random sequence of events that led to living cells and ultimately the Human Race JUST HAPPENED. It is just like a number extracted from a box containing many numbers, just a random number representing the universe as is. Hence there is nothing to explain especially since there is nothing to explain it against, to compare it too, something that happens only once is just random and has no explanation, needs no explanation, is not even within the realm of scientific theories and scientific endeavors since science requires REPEATABLE RESULTS, A PATTERN OF REGULARITIES, and in this case there is nothing repeatable and no regularity at all. It just happened once, will never happen again, hence no explanation is necessary, end of story.

2. If the big bang happened in our small corner of the universe or multiverse having many corners, and it happened in many different ways an infinite number of times, and with many different laws of physics in many other universes and space-times, etc. then out of an infinite number of combinations, the combination corresponding to our universe will surely pop out, so in this case, the number games guarantees that a universe with the Human Race will appear.

3. If there is no big bang and the universe is infinite in space and time, then the same as point 2 applies. Within an infinite universe, or just large enough for all the combinations to cycle through, probably an infinite number of times, like a counter, then out of such a large number of combinations, the combination corresponding to our universe will surely pop out, so even in this case, the number games guarantees that a universe with the Human Race will appear.

Hence all the debate between creationists and not, on the evolution of life and how it occured, is finally solved. This explains why the Miller experiment only produces just a few amino acids, and after decades it can’t get any further, because you probably need 10^100000000 centuries to get the combination of events that create DNA, the cell and life. Or you just need one very lucky random casual event that does the same.

Hence the RIDDLE OF LIFE AND EVOLUTION HAS BEEN SOLVED.

First off it should be titled the Origin of Life Riddle Solved!

What is the difference from just saying that “The Origin of Life” problem has been solved without giving any ifs or any explanations ? It is just the same, any sequence of symbols that is comforting, that convinces you that a problem is solved, solves the problem. It is all just a self convincing matter. Anything that sounds good can go, even anything at all, even if it doesn’t sound good, even nothing: a new way to do science, just solve it all in an instance! Just declare it SOLVED.

So then just declare that all and any problems are solved JUST BECAUSE, because they are solved without any need to further elaborate, end of story. So you actually solved all possible problems, along with the Origin of Life riddle.

ALL POSSIBLE PROBLEMS AND MYSTERIES HAVE BEEN SOLVED.

We have reached the end of the book of Science and Knowledge.

Conversely, you can just as well say that all possible problems and riddles, the riddle of the origin of life, will never be solved just because. So Science and Knowledge will never end but just go around in circles forever, expressing a new “set of symbols” everytime, to express some illusionary further knowledge.

Maybe it is a question of intentionalty of use, if the new knowledge allows you to handle and manipulate something further, makes you manipulate reality in new and different ways, it is actually something that contributes. If it doesn’t increase your “handling” capbability, it is useless, unless it increases your capability to handle new thoughts and invent new knowledge, and thoughts…

With this you are saying that you can’t seperate life from the entire universe - laws of physics. So you can’t explain the system using the subsystem, so when creationists say the probability of life is like a tornado going through a junk yard and creating a complete new car, they are trying to explain the total system using the subsystem, they are using a much more limited scale to explain a much larger scale: a tornado in a junkyard is still a much smaller scale than billions of molecules evolving on a planet size item for billions of years. And even this scale is wrong because billions of molecules on a planet evolving for billions of years is still much smaller than the one shot lucky number that is the universe with its laws and the sequence of events that brought life.

The creationists also make the mistake of saying if we can’t recreate life in a test tube than only god created it. That is like saying if man can’t understand it or recreate it, only a supernatural being can, so man is the utmost knowledgable being. It is as if they are saying man is almost god. Instead the one shot lucky number consisting of this universe with these laws with that given sequence of events that created life is way past our capability of experimenting and recreating. And doesn’t imply a god.

Aside from the fact that carbon chemistry creating life may be much more probable than what is thought, may be much more simpler to achieve in the sense that once the conditions of chemistry and temperature and earth like conditions exist, life may automatically and very quickly and simply occur and evolve.

Okey dokey, but where are the numbers?

Seems to me you have taken a guess and one that is impossible, at least right now, to treat as a hypothesis and test. So the problem of evolution, as you put it, not me, has not been solved, but a guess at what might turn out to be the solution has been put forward.

Consider a universe having one point in space and only one time interval, and consider that this point in space can only have two distinct states then:

one point, one time interval:

## time 0

0

1

then there are only two possible combinations or universe histories.

If a universe has one point, two time intervals:

time 0 time 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

then there are only four possible combinations or universe histories.

So two points and two time intervals would be 2 ^ 4.

So in general, for any number of points and time intervals, the possible universe histories or possible combinations would be (number of states) ^ (number of points * number of time intervals). So for example if you had 20 points in space with 20 time intervals and each point can have 4 distinct states you would have 4 ^ (20 * 20) or about 10 ^ 240 possible combinations.

So since there are 10^240 points in space and 10^80 time intervals for the complete age of our universe, and we can imagine that each point can have a thousand different states (one state means an electron is present in that point, another state means a photon is present in that point, etc. ), then the number of possible universe histories or possible universes with our laws of physics, the number of different combinations possible would be:

1000^(10^320)

The size of this number could be expressed if each point in the universe had a zero attached to it, kind of like saying that in order to write down the number in complete extended form representing the number of possible universe histories that our universe could have would require the size of the entire universe. You need a piece of paper the size of the universe just to write it down.

This may not be coincidental, the size of a universe may be just the right size to write down a number in that universe that corresponds to all possible combinations - histories that universe can have.

The real size of a universe should not be measured in light years, but in combinational possibilities.

Our universe is just one very large random number selected from this set.

Where is the set ? In a metaphysical dimension, beyond our senses…

I disagree with this math because time is just a gauging of motion and any # of motions can conceptually or theoretically occur in any distance of 3d space.

The laws of physics restricts the size of the set containing all possible universes. Only some of the numbers are valid, they are quantized, like the energy levels of atoms, only some of the numbers corresponding to a universe and its complete history are permitted according to the restrictions of the laws of physics.

On the other hand, the free wills within some of these universes tend to allow more of the forbidden numbers by exercising random, free will judgment and behavior. So those entities in some universes having free will, and are goal oriented, or just want to “express themselves” or whatever, are actually forms of resistance against the laws of physics: consciousness and the mind and human behavior follow no laws of physics but their own, they are all outside the laws of physics, as you can decide to do anything and anything you do is artificial and not natural. Of course free wills are always concentrated on fighting other free wills, in fact free wills are only reactions to other free wills, fights, hates and war, resistance against other free wills that want to express themselves etc. But not laws of physics.

The laws of physics are not fully known and likely will never be.