Absolutely…I do…if mainstream science is going to say that magic initiated everything then let it say that officially.
Of course its not going to say that…because it isn’t scientific!!!
The problem it has is that if magic didn’t initiate mainstream science…in other words something did initiate it then it’s deep rooted philosophical beliefs are false …the +=- and -=+ philosophy that is adopted for all of mainstream science is proven to be false…which it is…so either way mainstream science has lost and its been proven now that all of its theories are absolute man made BS.
It sounds like you believe there is an additional factor affecting everything on a fundamental level that is not being taken into account, an extra source of influence and balance which affects everything, and that hasn’t been discovered.
Mainstream science is not accepting that equal but opposite electromagnetic forces are balanced out between all spinning particles which make up all matter and this is what is holding all matter together and causing it to all to vibrate.It will not accept this due to its RELIGIOUS BELIEFS…NO OTHER REASON.
The reality is that science has got to be able to explain how binary data is produced in the cosmos because it impossible for sounds;visions and sensations to be produced without binary data.
How is it going to do that if it’s still claiming its BS that the cosmos and everything in it is expanding only???
So if we sped everything up sufficiently, then the entire Universe, or just our tiny part of it, would be shuddering? (couldn’t think of a better word, not great..).
Mainstream science is unable to explain how the electromagnetic force interactions NN;NS;SN;SS that exist between all spinning particles which make up all matter cancel out.They don’t cancel out because they are vibratory balanced out by the formula N/S=N/S resulting in push/pull forces between all particles…hence why the cosmos and all matter is held together and vibrates.
Mainstream scientists don’t want to know on this point because it doesn’t conform with their RELIGIOUS BELIEFS that force absolutes do not exist in the cosmos.
They will vomit on about how the electromagnetic field of a single object is the same for a N and S pole so these forces are the same and cancel out… and ignore the fact that these interactions are between two spinning particles or more and it’s impossible to cancel them out.
Mainstream scientists haven’t the first clue how reality philosophy and science works.
You can’t produce sounds;visions and sensations in reality without BINARY DATA!!!..its impossible.
I guess this is what’s left of philosophy after the Trinity completely resolved all paradoxes.
Sitting around smashing absurd ideas together folks long forgot or failed to consider, just to see, yet again, how the Trinity reigns supreme every time.
Ot like some kind of “made you laugh first” challenge.
If they cancel out, what is holding matter together?
Oh, they don’t cancel out? Well science agrees with you..
What is a force absolute?
They will vomit on about how the electromagnetic field of a single object is the same for a N and S pole so these forces are the same and cancel out… and ignore the fact that these interactions are between two spinning particles or more and it’s impossible to cancel them out.
I’m sorry, but I got to the point I needed to ask AI, which is a purely digital representation of thought. It obviously can’t be trusted fully, but on the below, I trust it.
The quote’s claim that it’s “impossible to cancel them out” is only true if you think “canceling out” means erasing the fundamental interaction itself. It doesn’t. It means the macroscopic sum of those interactions results in a null vector. This is basic vector addition, not a controversial mystery that scientists are ignoring.
The brain does it all the time. The data we process is not binary, and neither is how it is processed. I certainly don’t need AI for that one.
I love reading about your Trinity, but I understand so little of it that I am completely useless, and that’s why I don’t offer anything. I would need a fundamental understanding of what is being researched and proposed, and what it’s all based on. I really don’t, and I am getting old, so unless you join the “explain it so the absolute layman can understand it” brigade, I certainly won’t be of much help, although you have explained much already, but that’s more involving philosophy at a fundamental level..
Mainstream science claims that NN;NS;SN;SS electromagnetic force interactions cancel out in the cosmos …No they don’t…they balance out so attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force ABSOLUTES DO NOT cancel out in the cosmos as falsely claimed by mainstream scientists.
You can only produce sounds;visions and sensations from binary data.The physical body machine processes BINARY data.
I think you need to revise the distinction between “balance out” and “cancel out”. The first implies equilibrium between forces, the second implies nullification of force potential. Or have I got that wrong? You still haven’t answered, what is an absolute? Some people, people who aren’t even scientists, might say that absolutes don’t apply at all to magnetic forces, or any other type of force..
Attractive and Repulsive ELECTROMAGNETIC force interactions NN;NS;SN;SS are vibratory balanced out between all spinning particles in the cosmos resulting in a push/pull action between all particles (vibration).
Attractive and Repulsive electromagnetic forces are force absolutes because they are the only two forces in the cosmos.
Gravity;Electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces are mythical man made forces.
I’m not going to quote and respond to the first part, it’s just demonstrably not how any of that works, and exactly the same gaping holes are present in your logic from a fundamental perspective.
The only one I find questionable, is gravity. So I blasted the AI again:
Is Gravity a “force” as such, or is it the result of relativity between objects?
You’ve put your finger on a genuine and fascinating point of tension in modern physics. The answer depends entirely on which framework you use.
In Einstein’s General Relativity, gravity is not a force in the traditional sense. It is the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Objects follow the straightest possible paths (geodesics) through this curved geometry. What we feel as weight or experience as an apple falling is simply the result of that object’s natural path through a warped universe. From this perspective, gravity is a geometric phenomenon, not a push or a pull.
In quantum mechanics, however, physicists search for the hypothetical “graviton”—a force-carrying particle that would mediate the interaction of gravity, much like photons mediate electromagnetism. In this framework, gravity is treated as a force, one of the four fundamental interactions.
So, is it a force? Relativity says no. Quantum field theory says yes. The two views haven’t been reconciled yet.
Now, I’m not taking all that verbatim, but it does highlight a schism in modern science regarding one of your assertions.
The amount of energy that is produced in the cosmos is directly related to the spin speed of particles which directly affects the frequency of the balanced electromagnetic force interactions N/S (S) N/S.
In the above formula N/S represents a spinning particle which is vibratory interacting with another spinning particle N/S…(S) represents the varying frequency electromagnetic energy wave emitted as a result of the interaction.Increase or Decrease the spin speed of the particles and the amount of energy emitted from the particles increases or decreases.
Niall…the starting philosophy for reality is +/-=+/- and how this formula is applied in the cosmos is by vibratory balancing the attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS that exist between all spinning particles giving the formula N/S=N/S.Vibratory balancing the only two force absolutes in this way means that the cosmos and all matter within it is held together.The spin speed of the particle interactions is what determines the amount of energy produced in the cosmos…..so E=Mc2 is total man made up nonsense.
Mass is balanced out in the cosmos which is why all matter levitates in space.
That’s a tautology. It’s the same as saying 1=1. It describes nothing. I remember saying this to you quite a while back on the board, it’s pretty much the most meaningless equation to describe anything whatsoever, in any context.
Sorry Jupiter, but E=mc2 has slightly more merit..
Don’t even know where to begin with that. My brain hurts. Levitates..
N/S=N/S is a united formula for NN;NS;SN;SS …All 4 off combinations are found within the BINARY!!! formula N/S=N/S
You only need two force absolutes to explain the science within the cosmos.
E=mc2 holds no merit whatsoever and is unable to unite the macro/micro…I have told you how Energy and Binary Code is produced in the Cosmos.
The philosophical formula +/-=+/- also explains the consciousness experience which is also vibratory…something mainstream science knows nothing about.
in/out of the moment=in/out of the moment
So the formula works throughout the sciences even to the human experience at the consciousness level.
E=mc2…LOL…what does this fake formula mean in the overall scheme of things ??? and of what use is this formula to anyone??? absolutely no use whatsoever…Its an utterly meaningless formula.
That’s an ironic name for the first test of nukes in the Mojave Desert. A faint reflection to the unsoluble tie which pertains to exist between God and His Son(s).
Wonder who thought up the name?
Copilot: J Robert Oppenheimer
(The same guy who said something profound after the success of the test:
“ J. Robert Oppenheimer, physicist and the first director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, is famous for uttering the line, "Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds." He was paraphrasing a Hindu sacred text, the Bhagavad Gita, and a line that was on his mind while watching the Trinity Test, the world's first nuclear detonation.”