Russell existed becaue he needed to exist to claim that he didn’t exist and either believed that he was a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) OR a representation of reality (a non illusion)…..…….so why do I have to prove or disprove the BS Russell claimed?
1 Like
You don’t. I’m just messing with you. You can’t prove I’m not.
i don’t waste my time trying to prove or disprove binary logic biological machine reasonings…..I’m only interested in truth Ichthus.
As you exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist then why would you claim that you are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) rather than a representation of reality (a non illusion)?
In fact, 50 bajillion and 531
As you exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist then you don’t cancel out.As you don’t cancel out you are a representation of reality (a non illusion) rather than a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).
The SELF has escaped from binary (and non existence).
Exactly, same as the 5 bajillion 934 teapots have escaped
You carry on with your psychotic delusions in you EXISTENCE pseudoai…that is your choice…however some of us continue to move forward with representation of reality (non illusionary) philosophy and science to the complete rejection of misrepresentation of reality (illusionary) philosophy and science because we have a choice as well.
The light shines in the darkness ,and the darkness has not overcome it.
Very big if true
There appears to be some irony there…
.but where, by whom and most assuredly when
1 Like
SELF exists William and representation of reality (non illusionary) science confirms it because SELF occupies the centre ground whether it be on the left or the right or at the centre because existence and non existence occupy the left and right and SELF needs to exist to claim that SELF doesn’t exist.
I exist/I don’t exist=I exist/I don’t exist.
LOL!!!
Mainstream science is nonsense.
I got that thank you Jupiter, did you get my prior message on it that Descartes may have meant that ironically, not really literally? So I agree for those who would tend to disagree.
We know that Descartes claimed that he was electrical binary signals and therefore knew nothing of reality.He couldn’t get beyond his biological machine body.We know that electrical binary signals produce sounds,visions and sensations which the SELF interprets.Representation of reality (non illusionary) science confirms it.
He ghosted himself,Maybe for a reason..
He simply couldn’t get beyond binary William.He didn’t realise that no individual experiences external sounds,visions and sensations without binary signals.
I think Spinoza would agree with him. generally., not that could have made a difference , imminently.
Spinoza couldn’t experience external sounds,visions and sensations without binary data.Sounds,visions and sensations are created from binary data.Spinoza experienced sounds,visions and sensations and claimed things in his existential metaphysical state.We know this because the whole of the cosmos and all matter within it is vibrating due to balanced attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces and the SELF is embroiled within it and is separate from all matter and the varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves emitted from it.We know that the biological machine body antenna senses pick up varying frequency binary energy waves emitted from vibrating matter and we know that the machine is an analogue to digital converter of these waves into digital binary electrical signals which are used to create sounds,visions and sensations which the metaphysical SELF interprets.
So Nichiren was right in his supposed general framework requirement for belief that in order to believe, one must take it in at full face value . Not to regress from belief. That belief was hard wired, through many recurrences and to question that would be lubricious.
If asked how come, he would have said we’re always beyond the circuitry, but how to access it becomes increasingly difficult with time.
We know that binary data produces sounds visions and sensations William and the individual is separate from the binary data and the sounds,visions and sensations.
We are beginning to realize of the distinctions between the analogue and the binary sources of representing their relative relations approaching nil, then it took 2-3 hundred years of anachronistic progression to foreshadow , that is becoming more and more the reality of situations, and contextual assimilation .
An assimilation expressed by the Vienna circle positivists, which menus worked backward to undo the ironic twist in absence of an apology.