A line is as long as the number of events on it. All journeys are the same length if they have the same number of events.
We make constructions or events in the act of looking, because we draw geometries and events on what we see. So the more we look, the more we think something has got bigger. But things haven’t got bigger. They haven’t.
So the universe started when it was no size at all. Now, it is the same size as when it started, but because there are more events we say that it has “got bigger”. It hasn’t got bigger. Measuring the size of the universe is a task of science. In this case, science serves our preoccupation not with size, but with the number of events.
One day, in the far-off future, when the universe has ballooned out and all material events have vanished, the universe will be the same “size” as it was when it started because the number of events in it will be the same. That’s the truth. Thank God we have philosophy to help us think things like that out.
I think “Universe” isnt the word you need for this.
More like “sphere of human observation”
But even then, this is a pretty iffy theory.
The universe is the size of the universe, events or not. Whether that size fluctuates or not, we are still trying to figure out.
But we are certain it is very big and we havent seen most of it.
Increments of measure are not “events”. Events take place within those measures.
This looks like another attempt to form a distinction between “explanation” and “description”. We can describe a line using points, but those points do not explain the line.