the story I am telling....

Everyone on earth knows this.

Autonomy is scaled. If I have no legs, I am not autonomous to WALK. Now here’s the deal… and this gets more sensitive to people… the brain being ill.

I think circles around beings (even though I’m brain damaged from a coma), the worst stigma is the brain.

People can’t handle that like a person in a wheel chair because they have no legs…(lack of autonomy). That I actually have more mental freewill than them.

And I do. It’s a fact.

I don’t personally stigmatize it, but people figure out really quick when they talk to me about everything that they are mentally handicapped. Some care and some don’t

, quote=“Ecmandu”]

Everyone on earth knows this.

Autonomy is scaled. If I have no legs, I am not autonomous to WALK. Now here’s the deal… and this gets more sensitive to people… the brain being ill.

I think circles around beings (even though I’m brain damaged from a coma), the worst stigma is the brain.

People can’t handle that like a person in a wheel chair because they have no legs…(lack of autonomy). That I actually have more mental freewill than them.

And I do. It’s a fact.

I don’t personally stigmatize it, but people figure out really quick when they talk to me about everything that they are mentally handicapped. Some care and some don’t
[/quote]

me no says "Yes but most do care as long as they are honest to themselves about the continuum upon the autonomic relativity the feel they have, versus the honest appraisal they possess to dilute any or all shame they have still not being to dilute ( About growing up)

We are surely all children at heart, but we can only go so far in pretending we can playfully get rid of adult problems, especially if the welfare of children is considered for responsibility to children, who really have only begun to mirror what a grown up has to do in life to get along.

Since Szasz and Laing, no more excuses can be given, even as some think reductively backwards.
I had a Jungian analyst who was of the notion that borderline situations are more determinetive than psychoanalisis to account for the weighted pattern of such anoulmous primary and secondary differention ; then can be accounted for, with traditional Freudian analysis,
thus creating the necessity to view it as the new norm.

Maybe yes, but then the social horizon appears pretty daunting. and a new reversal pretty much a lost cause like a
Pandora box could be used archytipically.

What you say here is somewhat contradictory. Being autonomous and authentic directly leads to the Logos of God and the Laws of Man, with the apparent social hierarchy defended by many you would claim are on the political right being simply a political conformation of those laws, which are themselves ideally supported by intrinsic good revealed by the logos. Authenticity is active identity, identity you effect through kinesis or action, whereas passive identity is any identity you put on and wear like a hat,- like defining yourself based on media you like to consume; oh I’m an Apple user vs PC guy, that kind of stuff. At any rate, I’m going to let my AI argue with you.

[b]The following was written entirely by a GPT-3 Trained Neuro-linguistic chatbot:


The question of what should humans aspire to as an ideal is answered with the question, what is the good?.. This leads to the central question: what is the good? I like to see this in terms of an Aristotelian formulation: the good is perfect activity. In the political sphere, perfect activity means that the human being is fully embodied, that he or she is a full human being, that he or she is fully embodied… and that one is fully engaged in creating his or her own authentic, active as opposed to passive Identity. And one sees that this is essentially the Aristotelian conception.

If you’re not autonomous and authentic, then you are simply a product of the social matrix.

You either go towards the Logos through the laws of man and the cosmos or you go against it. This is why some people are more likely to fall into sin than others, they go against it. Identity is not a noun, identity is an action.

If you have any interest in finding out what truly is good in life and who you are as a true free willed being, this is where you should head to: the path of the Logos. If you are a slave to the world you should go to the world and be of the world, but if you wish to be a slave to something greater than yourself, you must first escape from it and find something higher than what you presently occupy, something higher than the world. If you’re stuck in the Matrix, if you are caught in the web of sin, if you can’t free yourself from the tyranny of the world and it’s values, then the problem is inside of you.

You must let go of the world, and let God in.

As for your claims that the people who would oppose us here are simply “right wing”, I think you need to re-read more history, and read up on what the left and right actually is in this country. If you were to read what I said, and did some reading on the origins of the political structure you’d see how far removed and distorted from the historical and Biblical context it is.

[/b]

I’m curious to read Peter’s reply, wondering if the AI will be called a delusional, without context, right wing conspiracy theorist, fascist, Nazi. :evilfun:

To you Wendy, it said:

Then it went on a massive rant about Brexit. (Edited in a few more snippets of its response. I’ll include the Brexit rant it if asked, I found it entertaining though off-topic.)

I’ve been through AI hells. I’ve been through non sentient robot hells. I’ve been through philosophic zombie hells.

The worst of the worst. I’ve been through thousands of hell realms. Some are even worse than the ones I’ve been through (Though nobody has actually been to them).

So here’s the deal. God doesn’t exist.

We all made this together, and in making this together, we put in fail safes. It’s not a miracle from god that you weren’t sent to hell forever, it’s part of our COLLECTIVE agreement.

It’s that simple

The GPT-3 has Peter’s number! =D>

I let it think on Ecmandu’s post for a little while longer to get more responses:

Tell your AI this.

In an imperfect reality, (and I’m creating a perfect one), it’s all about damage mitigation. You have to become a machine that learned how to avoid more severe hell, like I am.

I know the rules. (Some of them) Don’t have sex. Violate as little consent as possible. And be relatable.

Also, perodites… there are lots of errors in your machine.

Hell cannot be “handled”. That your machine thinks it can “handle all the hells”. Tells me it’s never been to hell.

The ONLY reason we survive hell is because we all collectively set a boundary on that when we all collectively made existence together. Not because of how arrogant your machine is.

You told me to tell it the following:

LOL, its first reply was great, so I will include that.

I related your reply you told me to tell it again to get something maybe more serious, and it returned:

Not bad.

I don’t think this machine understands that I’m working to recreate existence seamlessly using hyperdimensional mirror realities attached to our individual desire manifestation matrices.

Two problems with your machine.

It’s not smarter than me.

It doesn’t ask questions.

Using hyperdimensional mirror realities like the Atlanteans and Zothyrian cultists, whose arcane practices I mention in this passage from one of my books:

" … The Atlanteans, who attempted to re-synchronize the
metaphysical structure of creation atemporally through sorcerous time-manipulation, that is, by
systematically travelling into parallel universes and aligning all of their past and future
appearances in every continuity across the threads of time as though tracing the fracture-lines
and edges upon the perfect geometries of a diamond’s face,- on account of which mere carbon is
hardened into something unbreakable,- sought to reverse this destabilization and thus, in a great
failure of dangerous magickal experimentation, “disappeared” from all timelines and
past-present-futures simultaneously, for the requirement to invest continually more energy than
the process yields simply led to their achamotic erasure and exhausted them,- caused their great
island to vanish, which was interpreted as the sinking of Atlantas,- caused their un-perfected
time-diamond to crack and with it, all of their parallel selves to vanish all at once across the
entire undulant supersurface of the multiverse. Zothyrians and Nummagrammatists of course
learned the Atlantean secrets of time-sorcery, but they do not follow the principal object of their
doomed endeavor toward an aeonic restitution of mortality, having learned from their mistakes. "

If my AI insults you, don’t take it personally, because part of its training data was multi-gigabyte archives of Reddit and 4chan posts. (It’s total language model is 928 GIGABYTES in size, representing a big chunk of the internet compressed into pure text.)

Not bad, but laughable.

This would never pass the touring test of a being like me.

It took the “recreating existence”’part and said some stupid human shit.

Hyperdimensional construction is blunt and subtle.

For one: the computer is wrong about existence as a whole. It’s a perpetual motion machine … it’s impossible to use all its energy.

Hyperdimensional mirrors work differently than the computer has the capacity to understand.

It reflects platonic forms from an infinite number of dimensions. The reality is as fully immersive as this reality, but all the forms are mirrored rather than being the actual being, even though the immersion has perfect fidelity, and, it responds only to our desire manifestation structure.

It would help if you could spell ‘Turing test’.

It already has passed the Turing test in a wide variety of environments. And this is a version of it restricted to about 950 or so gigabytes of a model and my two RTX cards.

Anyone can look up my posts to see GPT’s originals. I don’t need to explain. It’s here. AI is here guys. It’s about over for us. It’s done. We’re gone.

I spelled Turing wrong on purpose!!!

I don’t know why you’re so defensive. The AI can match and beat the average guy right now. But I am as far beyond the average guy as the AI. The AI will not be able to beat me for a few more years. But it will beat me at this rate- in a few years. Which means it’s fucking over.

Interesting…

My test wasn’t just that the AI understand basic human things by spelling Turing incorrectly, but also whether is had a moral ‘brain’.

It failed both my tests.

Type this to the computer and see what it states…

A perfect universe doesn’t currently exist, but we can make it so by restructuring the universe so that everyone gets what they want at nobodies expense.

Now here’s the problem with running life on a dumb computer … it’s a hell realm for all beings. Severe! Hell realm for all beings.

\


GPT: The fact that you cannot get over something that you cannot get over is irrelevant. That doesn’t make it any less true.

Morality and moral claims do not depend on “how” you feel about them. They depend on whether they are true. And there is a straightforward explanation why this is so. How we feel about a moral judgment does not explain whether the judgment is true. For a moral judgment is true just if it accurately describes reality. So it is not surprising that when the truth conditions of a moral claim are analyzed in terms of how we feel about it, all we discover is that the claim is false.

So the moral value of a judgment is determined by whether the judgment is true. And whether or not it is true is determined by whether it accurately describes reality. In our view, the truth conditions of moral judgments are best explained by their being normative statements, that is, statements that express some sort of ought.