The story of Makosi

Social Forums Non-Philosophical Chat
1

Zimbabwean slutbag cons British Immigration

This is a story which makes me laugh and cry out in anger in equal measure. Makosi is a woman who was born in Zimbabwe who came to Britain to work as a nurse. Her working in this role was one of the main conditions of her being allowed to stay here by the Home Office. She quit her job as a nurse to go on the Big Brother reality TV game show, thus violating the conditions of her visa (which didn’t consider Big Brother to be worthwhile employment, somewhat strangely). While on the show she frollocked around in bikinis, flirted with and kissed a great many of the other contestants, including the women, and had unprotected sex with one of the contestants in the jacuzzi.

She faced deportation due to violating the terms of her working visa but has essentially conned the Home Office into believing that because she was such a careless whore on the show that she’ll be castigated and possibly attacked if she is sent back to Zimbabwe. Now I couldn’t care less as to whether that is true, the reasoning is absurd. Basically her argument is ‘because I broke the laws of your country by quitting my job and going on TV I should be allowed to stay in this country’. Had she never broke the conditions of her visa in the first place she’d still be allowed to live here without any problems, but because she
a) broke the law and
b) was a slutbag on national TV
she is being allowed to stay here.

This country has enough shallow, exotic-looking sluts. We don’t need to import them from foreign dictatorships. We certainly shouldn’t be sending out the message that immigrants can come here and use the freedoms in this country to do something that means that they can’t return to their home country and be legally protected and allowed to stay. By that reasoning if someone came from a foreign country where you were expected to be Muslim (for example) and they changed their religion to, say, Buddhism that they should be allowed to stay simply on their say-so that
a) they really are a Muslim
b) they would suffer if they returned to their home country

I think these are the actions of a calculating woman who knew exactly how to play the game. One of her housemates agrees

I think that the immigration services have, once again, bowed to media pressure over the legal status of an attractive female. Time and again I’ve seen asylum seekers get their picture and story all over the press because they are a young and attractive female and despite a dubious case have mysteriously been allowed to stay in this country.

2

The article seemed to suggest that the Home Office disagreed with the tribunal’s decision and are thinking of appealing.

3

I made a mistake, the Home Office granted the initial visa but some other body dealt with her appeal against deportation. Nonetheless I think that this is a joke of a legal case and a daft precendent to set…

4

By including that line you are really arguing with yourself. If you think that Big Brother was work (Which I also do) then you should continue along those lines that Makosi should never have been in the position that she is in, and therefore any argument after that situation is NULL and VOID.

Also…AFTER BIG BROTHER, she is a celebrity, and that earns a wage also, so still working, still attending interviews, and likely to earn more than a nurse. But unfortunately a bad icon for our country, which is the most destructive part for her living in our country, and basically gives her a biased judgement.

But I do agree with your thinking if you ignore your quote.

5

By including that line I was trying to show how silly this whole situation is…

I don’t consider being interviewed about trash and having your photo taken counts as worthwhile employment and as such I think Makosi should be forcibly removed from this country.

The thing that bothers me most is that there’s a real tendency developing whereby the only asylum claims that gain press attention are those of attractive looking females. What does this say about the British press? Well, basically it says that they are more concerned with selling papers than with covering a story as a matter of principle. This is, of course, utterly unsurprising. But the result is that everyone who isn’t an attractive looking female who is seeking asylum will lack the added tool of press pressure.

I did of course paint a tabloid picture of the situation but I do think that there’s a grossly unsatisfactory dynamic at play. That we as a nation are more likely to care about asylum seekers if they conform to certain standards of physical appearance…