****The Structure of Good and Evil by Degree of Human Constitution
Good people are people who embody the narrative that others maintain about themselves and the group they gain identity from. If one fits the narrative of what constitutes another’s or group’s identity then that person is good, if one is misaligned then they are evil.
People tell themselves and eachother a story.
The story gives identity to themselves and or the group.
Those that align with the story are good because people desire identity.
Those that do not are evil because it questions the desires for said identity.
So the question of good and evil is an assertion of whether one aligns or misaligned with the individual or group desire for identity for even the interpretation of Good and Evil, as structures, is a structure which reveals Good and Evil as distinct.
Good and evil are not things as much as interpretations of desire and by said interpretation does Good and Evil become a thing as the structure becomes the boundaries of identity.
What is Good, what is Evil, is the narrative that contains the attention of those who hold the narrative and this narrative itself is but unquestionable assertions by which the narrative is built.
In these regards Good and Evil, at a meta-level, is relegated purely to the force of assertion and whether or not that assertion, which structures to maintain itself across a scale of conditions that will test it, folds reality to a deep enough degree that meaning emerges by the effects of it.
This meaning is change, Good and Evil are founded on the nature of change itself for how things change determines the structure of reality and with it corresponding identities.
The question of Good and Evil was never about Good and Evil, it was always about identity for the question is identity oriented thus by degree Good and Evil are structural mechanics of attention derivation itself.
Even the mechanics of alignment and misalignment are inversely proportional to the structures of Good and Evil itself as a Good structure aligns alignment with Good as Good and misalignment as Evil, Evil structure aligns alignment with Evil as Good and misalignment as Evil. In these respects the nature of Good and Evil are contained within eachother and are invariant by degree of the process of alignment.
This alignment mechanic points to a form of unity in identity that scales across both for the Good derives a unity of identity and the Evil also derives a unity of identity but the degree of how that unity is embodied an propagated requires a functional mechanism that transcends both. There is Good that derives unity from the individual and unity from the group, there is Evil that derives unity from the individual and unity from the group. In these respects an isomorphism occurs where the foundational nature show an equivalence across structure thus relegating each to pure assertion as judgment and distinction.
Simultaneously the projection of absence of identity occurs for both as the Good will see Good in the Evil and the Evil will see Evil in the Good thus by further degree a mechanism of projective interpenetration occurs at a foundational level where the embodied narrative structure of one sees a potential presence, by degree of absence, in the other of said structure. In these regards the dichotomy of Good and Evil is belief driven in the respect of seeing a potential future which must be actualize through further attention.
The nature of the Good and Evil narrative is thus one of containment as each contains the other through its relation with the other by which each becomes distinctly defined, as each respectively, through the conflict.
This conflict maintains itself across scale with Good and Evil observing definitive narrative for a justification of said conflict which inevitably becomes unneccessary as the conflict is what Good and Evil essentially are. What is deemed as peace is a meta-narrative of the conflict that allows the conflict to scale towards a potential state the allows for its subsequent derivation of momentum.
The nature of the degree of these degrees is the attention itself for by attention does perspective become created and embodied while dually the corresponding assertions from it are directed into existence.
The assymmetry of existence is the potentiality by which each respect paradigm, Good and Evil as narrative, are allowed to fully express themselves as at a pure equilibrium each ceases to be at the individual and group narrative level.
This assymetry is the alternation of peace and conflict across time by which each becomes distinct for what each is and is not while simultaneously being the potential for the other to occur with conflict itself being the primary element as division allows for the identities of Good and Evil to remain within there respective narrative structures.
What remains across both is that which contains the attention of each and the perspectives that are these containers are the narratives themselves thus by default a functional degree of recursion subcedes each as the perspective is the repetition of a narrative and the narrative is the repetition of assertions compounded of themselves.
