Maybe you get distracted too easily and can’t respond unless it is a direct response to a specific post you made, so here you go:
But communism is a political application of dialectical-historical materialism. Having denied capitalist logic, I have equally denied the logic of dialectical-historical materialism… [b]So how can I be either a communist or capitalist?
Yeah, correct, didn’t come into it until Marx.
Hegel had plenty of influence before Marx man… he did ‘come into it’ before him… Dude.
It’s what you said though.
But communism is a political application of dialectical-historical materialism. Having denied capitalist logic, I have equally denied the logic of dialectical-historical materialism… So how can I be either a communist or capitalist?
So do you have a response to this or not? I have come up with my own economic theory and rejected communism and capitalism as two sides of one coin, the hypermnemata. My OP might have gone over your head- but nonetheless, that is what this post is about. Stop calling me a communist because I reject capitalism. To be a communist, you must have adopted the dialectical historical materialist vision of history. Not only have I NOT adopted it, I have devoted about 300 pages of raw text to disentangling and refuting it. So please, just go.
.
It appears you don’t even know what ass-kissing is - try having a substantive exchange with the OP instead of these little tidbits - this is a forum, not a chat room.
I certainly did not kiss any ass with anything I said - that is delusional talk.
.
Unless you have a response to what I just said.
But communism is a political application of dialectical-historical materialism. Having denied capitalist logic, I have equally denied the logic of dialectical-historical materialism… So how can I be either a communist or capitalist?
Either give me a response to that or stop calling me a communist because this is literally as dumb as calling Dawkins a creationist. I can’t fucking retard myself enough to keep responding to you and I am down 2 pints of Jameson and a bottle of wine and 12 percocet.
Uh-huh…
I did respond several times.
Before communism, ‘capitalism’ didn’t exist. People spoke about the markets, or people doing business, or economy, but ‘capitalism’ was not a thing.
Communism is that, the synthesization of the idea of capitalism and prompt disapproval of it.
You can get angry about it and throw a tantrum, or concentrate.
I mean if your contention is that communism is Marx’s historical-dialectic based on Hegel, but you also concede that communism predates Marx, then one of us is tripping over himself and it isn’t me.
Just sayin’.
Capitalism didn’t exist before communism? Dude have you ever actually read Smith or Marx or… fucking literally anything? "Communism is the synthetization, blah blah? " No… It isn’t… It is the political application of Marx, which is the political application of Marx’s philosophy, which is the political application of dialectical historical materialism. I get that you haven’t read Marx or communist texts, just like little Dawkin’s cock-suckers haven’t read any biblical texts. I get it. But I am not in the mood to humor your ignorance. Your definition of communism is stupid.
So: I am gonna go jerk off now. You’re another nobody with nothing to say. Dawg: communism is the political application of the dialectical materialist vision of history. I have rejected BOTH the logic of capitalism, namely in its tertiary or third stage, and the logic of this Hegelian inversion- the materialist history. So HOW can I BY DEFINITION be either a capitalist or communist? You have not refuted or even attempted to refute either my definition of communist or the three stages of capitalism I clearly defined in the OP. So if you don’t have what it takes to meet my arguments, why don’t you just go?
The logic of capital predates both capitalism and Marx, like I said in the OP. Maybe read it. But you dared to call me a “communist” because I rejected capitalism, not even able to define what communism was, let alone what MY original economic theory was. You have nothing to say to me, or to anyone else. The fact that you dare call me a communist, even when I devoted more than a book’s length of text to refuting the dialectical materialist vision of history upon which communist and socialist philosophy is based, is all I need to know to determine a very simple fact-- you’re nothing and nobody, and you have nothing to say.
If you can quote one use of ‘capitalism’ in the writings of Smith, I will withdraw and admit I am an idiot.
If you can explain how exactly I am a communist while philosophically dismantling the entire system of dialectical-historical materialism upon which all communist philosophy is based, I will let you choke yourself to climax on my uncircumsized smegma-marinated, nine and a half inch white cock.
I already did, my boy.
You only said:
communism= rejecting capitalism.
I explained that’s dumb because there is an esoteric logic at work that has absorbed both ‘capitalism’ and ‘communism’, leading to what we have now: globalism and corporatocracy. Is that what you are? A Bill Gates and Elon Musk shill?
Now, you can keep playing out homosexual fantasies in your head and throwing a tantrum,
but fax are fax.
Maybe sober up and concentrate, I will let you chalk it up to heroin abuse.