The touch of God

Brethern.
All thee suffering souls in chains, in desire for food now, sexual skin to skin next, and before you know it, for truth and dominance of the spirit. Oh ye sinners among my speciemen, apes on high strung chords, forever in the hope of becoming human, like the anointed and no longer suffer the inflictions of suffering by oneself upon oneself. This is my appeal to Kreistos to renounce the shadows of the old men in the ancient churches and to extinguish the candle of faith. No one to leave behind, all are dead or corrupted by the untimeliness of your arrival and the mythical futurality of your departure, which caused the most terrifying visions to be inflicted on man. And as you are god you know, visions are realer than matter, and one vision can rule over many Aeons of matter.

So to you my dear Lord not a prayer but this time a fare-thee-well, a ticket for the Titanic and ophoepelen nu.

But did God depart? Ha. Of course he did never intend even to listen to such nonsense. God is in the triangle, the capstone of the work. - God was never even here. Man may earn Gods touch by exertion, that is all.

So here is my introduction to the greatest question religion is capable of answering: when does God actually show up, and why then and there?

God is the moment where hope turns into something stronger. His touch is a shiver, a breath shifting up the spine, a moment of hearing the resonance of the soul, which appears large and dark except for silver threads of recognition. Truth is then seen as ones own creation, and God is felt as mother, father or lover. The next moment one is a different person. Stronger but also humbler, especially before oneself.

O ye sinners,
How dare you judge god?
Didn’t you know,
You must become a god,
Before judging a god?

Thunder rolls over my house, the lightning penetrated the room just as I finished your post.

A song titled “lightning” just queued on my smartphone.

I dont know if that was true. Was it? If so that is really cool and exactly what I mean.

We can be bound by confluxing currents in the semantic eventosphere.

Some might call synchronicity, serendipity, epiphany, God.

If we have OUR answers to those three questions, we will miss this God. God comes to us in/on a cloud of unknowing.
Pay attention. You just never know.

Once God woke up in the middle of the night.
He didn’t fall asleep ever again.
This is why he created man, the creature that goes to sleep. Man can never be asleep as God once was asleep, but he can still fall asleep as all creatures fall asleep.

We are vital to the degree of the depth of our sleep -
we plunge into Gods desire, we are revitalized with anything he wishes to give to sink into himself,
God rewards sleep - this is why the selfish Lion sleeps the better part of his life… while the Sun sets and rises on his body his awareness sinks toward the never-fully-existing heart of God. God (necessity, self-valuing) created the Lion to come close to him, to be close to himself. The Lion is ‘meant’ to feel necessary to himself.

In a way he created all creatures like this -
we are all creatures in the scientific sense - entities. Only some creatures and some actions can be described in terms of this divinity. I believe that this is the only relevant meaning of the term. God must produce some form of hierarchy among creatures, or he is only another fantasy.

The simplest hierarchy is always believers above unbelievers, which is facilitated by the hierarchy of liars above believers.
But I wish to eliminate the whole concept of belief from the conception of divinity.

A god is revered and thus created. An unrevered God does not exist.

God is nature valuing herself over man, through man.

God is the truth which comes to us as a whisper in the ear ~~ finally.

[size=50]though I’m agnostic.[/size]

It does seem ironic that the more God recedes from us as an active entity the less creative we become. This is not implied as a rule but it does seem to be a trend, a kind of long diminuendo as one hears God less and less.

The Sky was in my eyes

dissolved into my throat.

I swallowed it ~~

and Something ~~ touched me!

Parodites’ conception of God or the Gods gives them as conjured up beings that serve to our minds as roads serve to a traveler. Since their existence is nothing to do with hard logic and derivation and deduction, since they are not the result of ‘getting down to brass tacks’ but rather of the impossibility to do justice to ones experience of self with the sole means of logic – they are kin to the substance of poetry and quite required for its more potentiating form, myth -, and by extension for wisdom as well, as science can not give us wisdom nor can logic, and philosophy must include both science and gods.

Gods after all exist, but not scientifically so – they exist psychologically, and the psyche is the terrain of the philosopher, who from there also commands science.

Fixed Cross

Je dirais Amen à cela - impeccablement dit.

Not what scriptures say.

1 Thesalonian 5;21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Scriptures also tell us to be as perfect as God. To do so we must judge the veracity of all he says and does.

I have judged the ability of God to judge and find that he is not a moral judge at all.

This speaks of Jesus.
He was chosen before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake.

The above quote shows this as Gods first actual judgement and shows his setting and accepting a bribe of a human sacrifice to corrupt or alter his justice and judgement.

Justice usually states that only the punishment of the guilty is acceptable to justice and that it would be unjust to punish the innocent.

God’s corruption of this usual justice is what the bribe or sacrifice of Jesus bought. Injustice.

If you elect your judges in your country, would you vote God in as a fair and just judge knowing that he can be bribed?

Do you think God a just judge?

Judge and give your verdict. We will judge your morals from it.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL

Thank you Arc. Good sign that this speaks to your experience.

You are welcome. Why do you say this?

A slowly-moving residual from the past, leaving a contemplative mood.
A touch by god?

I think you are quite capable of becoming possessed by certain divinities.
To the archaic Greeks possession was the virtue that brought them Homer, and it always remains a virtue unto itself.

The primordial god-idea, which has nothing to do with a creator God, is a means to happiness, as the mind is the main source of unhappiness, dissatisfaction, and gods are invoked to challenge, break open the minds lethargy, its self-reference in which it finds only the premise of logic, a thing is a thing - and I feel something about that but I don’t know what’. The mind is not naturally equipped to deal with the body, and all of human culture has been a means to bring the opposition under control. Gods are means to make the mind subservient to the spirit, the will. “Atman” is the soul who controls this, comes into being as this control, and his nature is breath.

And this is why we smoke – the touch of breath.
Smoking is a God-surrogate, or perhaps simply a God.

Hmm.

Plant
plasma
placebo
pliant
plagiarism
plastic
planet
plaster
plumbing
explosion

Sorry to leave you with this last cut. One of the nature of religions is also that we talk an explosive amount of shit. It is all speculative, until it becomes real, which it only does in experience, usually. Indirectly this brings us to believe in things that may be explained away quite quickly by what many the perceive to be the cynical forces of nature.

But this is why we should ideally apply Gods where there is boredom, stagnation, and never when there is already holiness - when the gods apply themselves to you, keep going and praise them only by becoming more independent. Gods are the circumference of independence. Reason is pure dependence. It is the premise that all truths depend on the veracity of preceding truths, except self-evident truths which are empirical and experiential only. Analytical knowledge is formed when the empirical is translated into to words. We can state that all knowledge derives from experience, and is a from of experience. Knowledge is an experience, therefore objects of knowledge are also experience. Therefore all things that can be known are experience, and thus – and here Nyghl goes further than I can because he follows an argument for being as a whole that contradicts my own reason - all is experience - and thus, existence equals experience.