my ideas are very, very moderate compared to their openly racist views. My views are racialist, not racist. I have developed a philosophy called racialism, please see in essays section.
also I checked out stormfront. people there are openly racist, I find that quite offensive. as human beings, we all have to live together as racially aware human beings. I find it offensive to see two people of different race mix for their are not even producing a human beings. Mixed beings are not human beings for they have no race to belong to.
This is because of this, humanity is made up of 3 great races. so ONLY members to the three races are human beings. others are not human beings.
Look, if you think my views are extreme, check out the site, even I nearly choked. Racists are stupid but racialists who want to preserve their living connection to their ancestors is doing what is most rational and patriotic. You can only continue your line by propagating within race. The continuation of the three races is a continuation of the essence of humanity, without the three races, humanity does not exist.
We all owe our existence to our families, our nations, our races. If your parents are asian then you are asian, if you parents are black then you are black. so you are a racial continuation of your parent. though you do not look exactly like your parents, you are nevertheless a racial continuation.
Just to make sure I am human…
Which races count?
I mean…you could say asian, black, and white…
But japanese look very distinct from chinese, who look very distinct from koreans. All same race?
What about jews…jews are white, but not caucasian. Are they a separate race, and thus inhuman?
What about native americans? East Indians?
There’s over a billion east indians…surely they must count?
Arabs? no? confused
No Jews, Doc. I thought that much was clear by now.
And no God-damned tomatoes either.
…
POR you are sane in the way that a lemon is sweet compared to a lime. Unfortunately this makes you more of a Manichee than a Christian. Not that you are likely to understand such a cryptic statement. But tell me, Victor, who is the way, the truth, and the light? What does it mean to be a human being? Which is the path to eternal life?
A lemon is a lemon, Pinnacle. And you are one sour SOB.
You have a penchant for literalizing rhetorical questions in just the exact manner so as to bring out that very rhetorical meaning.
…
And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. (1 John 5:11).
And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day (John 6:40).
…
So then, again; What does it mean to be a human being? Which is the path to eternal life?
From a Christian point of view, a rational animal is a divine animal. In other words, it is a being composed of two broad elements. So whilst race may give as our raw biological distinctness, to argue that it gives us our spiritual identity - our very humanity itself, is a positively unreligious message. Nowhere will you find it written that in order to become Christlike - which just means to become a man - you ought to ‘preserve your racial identity’. You have your priorities all out of place. Is it not obviously so?
Its like your saying what I’m thinking but never had the guts to say. You are a true hero PoR. I will officially vote “no” on that silly banning you thread.
