The argument of women being innocent angelic beings incapable of malice goes as the following. That woman can do no wrong. That woman is incapable of malice or perpetrating acts of social inequality themselves.
That everything is socially in equal, malicious, and horrible in the world is directly associated with men or male agitators. That this premise is unquestionable and ought to remain as such without the slightest amount of skepticism. That men who questions these premises is malicious or somehow at fault themselves for not acknowledging the perfectibility of a woman’s innocence in not being able to do wrong.
It seems all these myths; that if women were in charge of the world we’d have peace or that hippies actually believed in free love or even that a human life has no more value than a dog, have been put to rest. I get it, no one actually takes them completely seriously anymore. Can we please, just stop fucking around and put the final nail in the coffin?
World peace? Look at Hilary Clinton running the government department of defense with incidents in Benghazi.
So much for women being leaders of peace and virtue in contrast to men.
Oops…I’ve violated the number one politically correct rule there again. Shame on me. Women can do no wrong or malice! Women are angelic innocent beings capable of no exhibits of tyrannical or socially in equal forms of behavior! I worship the alter of women everywhere! Must retain some level of politically correct discourse here no matter what!
I think the impression of women being always innocent and do-gooders is partly a result of the male perspective. If I’m right in thinking that men and women play different biological roles in relation to each other, then men play the roles of providers and protectors while women play the role of child rearer. This means that men most likely have an inborn default impression of women as innocent and harmless–therefore needing protection and love (like a child). It’s part of what draws us closer to them.
We are often shocked when we find out that women are, well, human too. Human beings are nasty and ferocious creatures–women are no exception. But this can come as such a shock to men that they often feel betrayed or “lied to” when they see it. But no one’s spreading lies–or at least it doesn’t originate from lies–it’s just that it doesn’t feel like the most “natural” way of perceiving women from a male perspective.
This thread is mostly devoted to the denial that women can do any wrong or malice.
It is also about the denial of female participants in social inequality. There is this sort of stigma that it all originates from men only where it is actually quite the opposite.
Mostly it is a thread destroying the concept that women are somehow more better, peaceful, or socially egalitarian than men.
Like the comedian I was watching yesterday said, the reason why men do nothing is because we don’t want to piss off the women especially because we want to fuck them.
So, in effect a lot of these sexual double standards are perpetrated by men who are the enablers in all of this.
I agree with that (except the part I struck through).
I think men have to take the responsibility of expressing themselves more, which they don’t do enough. But I feel confident that this needn’t be in an insulting or fight-provoking way–it can actually be positive. However, sometimes a confrontation can’t be helped–if it has to be that way, I’d choose self-expression over self-censorship any day.
I’m done with playing nice with women. I’m all about treating them disposable like they have to me in the past or how they treat many other men as well.
No more Mr. Nice guy. That goes to all the male [Mangina] enablers of them also.
Tell me more about this. I’m gonna try and narrow down why you’re not having luck with the ladies. I’m gonna go ahead and say that the GPS tracking thing is probably not helping.
