Theory: Sexual Capitalism

Right, because modern men are so ‘sane’. Fucking perverted weirdos.

1 Like

So no male Iraqi soldiers died during Gulf War II??? Delusional.

Just because the “men” in your life abandoned and betrayed you, doesn’t mean your personal experiences of men, and malice toward men, apply to everybody else. For 95% of other women, men are Protectors, Fathers, Heroes, Inspirations, etc. And like most other Western Women, you take for granted the spoils of war which have been won for you, on behalf of men. All the luxuries, safety, economic wealth, technology–all developed FOR YOU, by men. Yet you spit on all men, because of a few bad apples around YOU.

1 Like

This is a case study in straw men. Wow. You’ve done me proud :heart_eyes:

This is a case study in straw men. Wow. You’ve done me proud :heart_eyes:

This is a case study in straw men. Wow. You’ve done me proud :heart_eyes:

1 Like

four fucking characters

2 Likes

Female sexuality even in ancient times revolved around power, resources, and dominance.

Even then female sexual capitalism was already well pronounced. The man who could provide shelter, food, protection, and basic necessities women would exchange themselves sexually for resources.

Over the ages this sexual capitalism has evolved with each passing historical era from neolithic times to our now current post modern period. Women seem unable to evolve past these primitive animalistic behaviors for the same sexual behavior is displayed in every historical era. The female psychological sexual pathology thus always remains unchanged.

In this sexual capitalism of reproduction the men deemed lesser are always sacrificed within society and this human sexual inequality always seems prevalent in every historical era.

Women say they detest and are against human social inequality, but in reality female sexuality thrives within inequality especially within the inequality of men.

1 Like

Such a realistic image. You are such an ignoramus You really have no clue about social evolution, yet you call yourself a ‘communist’ :rofl:

How about you stop telling women what women want. You really do have some fucking nerve.

2 Likes

If this is the case, why do so many women choose men who are losers, financially, sexually and emotionally?
So many disappointments out there. :zany_face:

2 Likes

Because the women are losers, so their options are narrowed down to the male losers that will have them.

2 Likes

Right, because every woman dreams of an orange, brain-dead billionaire. Everything is ALWAYS about money with you yanks.

2 Likes

1 Like

Well, i feel like we devolved (as scheduled) into the men vs the women stage of our pointless participation at a philosophy forum, so let’s get em.

So i agree with Nietz that women are for the recreation and re-creation of the man. Forget about what you’re reading in Cosmopolitan magazine, ladies. I’m telling you the hard troof of the matter. You ladies are mobile incubators.

But at the same time, you can’t know how valuable and loved you are by a man because to be able to know this is to be able to lust after a woman as a man. You’d have to be able to experience how wonderful a woman is in this context of lusting to see just how magnificent a woman is. Therefore, only a man can have the highest respect for women… or i should say only men can experience what is most great about them. It’s magic that only men are affected by… in the same way we can’t know what it’s like to lust after a man.

One critical element in this special feeling of lust is the fact that when a man lusts after a woman, part of that lust is born from the excitement he feels at the thought of finding someone who could mother his mini-me. She’s like something of a portal for the man. The attraction to her is profound on deeper levels (male homos can’t experience this).

And if a lesbian lusts over a woman or a gay dude lusts over a man, it’s a lower form of lust, much cruder and incomplete… a gross imbalance and perversion of power that originates in some abnormality in development (failure with women/men, cultured by feminine/masculine influences, etc).

I’m much less critical of female homosexuality because of a particular bias, though. I don’t interpret a female as weak if she lusts after a woman, while i do interpret a man as weak if he lusts after a man. Not physically weak… psychically weak. Lacking a certain mojo, a certain dominant quality. It is as if they hump each other to death in the BUTTOCKS to get out a rage that is felt against their impotence with women, but i dunno. It’s all so tacky i can’t even imagine. Not saying i condemn all gay dudes to oblivion. There’s all kinds of other strange shit in nature that i don’t condemn, either. I mean, it is a shit show, after all.

1 Like

Preliminary theory for why the Wittgensteins and Godels turn gay.

1 Like

But again, i am a raging, very biased heterosexual who was lifting up girls’ skirts when i was five. I was lookin’ at the old man’s ‘hidden’ (not very well) playboys when i was six. Full heart-shaped 70s bush. Daisy dukes, the sexy bronze tan. The shirts tied in those little front knots. Not a single fake boob; every one, firm, supple, perfect natural curvature. There wasn’t a hot chance in hell that I’d EVER become a homo. Not after what i saw in those magazines after school when the old man was still at work, mates.

We were the kids that had a secret stash of porn mags at their fort when they should have been trading baseball cards instead. We did that, too, but you know what i mean. Oh yeah. It has been beaten into my brain since i can remember that the sexy female beast must be obtained before all else.

1 Like

@reason4emotion

Lowered expectations, compromise, sexual bargaining, and settlement.

:clown_face:

Human sexual relations is a market as women themselves are sexual capitalists. Feminists will say it is the male patriarchy that the sexual market derives from, but of course that is a deceptive lie as it derives from women themselves. Like any capitalist fetish unrealistic expectations are then created where people believe them to be reality.

Women essentially commodify themselves in this market where they set their own values within.

:clown_face:


It is possible to find a woman or female who has broken away from their primitive biological and psychological condition concerning the animalistic part of the human female brain that doesn’t view men as capitalistic sexual exchanges, but such women are exceedingly rare where as a man you can go your entire life without ever meeting one. For a majority of women there is only the primitive mindset that views men as sexual capitalistic exchanges for themselves to profit off of. Such is the primitive impetus of a majority of human females, sexual relations and reproduction is merely an investment for them. Their emotional, social, and existential loyalty only to that of a man providing where there is nothing else beyond that.

Women in terms of the majority are materialistic creatures of luxury and comfort where almost everything of their lives revolves around such.

:clown_face:

1 Like

Of course, everything is about money to shallow Americunts like you. People don’t just fall in love. It’s never about chemistry.

You have a really bad habit of ‘speaking for women’. Who are these so-called ‘feminists’?

Just because your desperate dumpling of a wifey settled for a misogynistic piece of shit like you (not to mentiion a hypocrite and a phony) doesn’t mean any other women are ‘settling’. Most women these days have their own money and security. They don’t need to ‘settle’ the way they used to before they had basic human rights.

2 Likes

Seriously, just go fuck yourself. I’m sure your desperate blob of a wife will be immeasurably relieved if you do.

2 Likes

excrement for excrement

1 Like

Now, while i might caution against the idea of having five childrens as a working class family in 21st century ermerica, it is appearing as if Mr. Authoritarian is an adequate provider and in stable circumstances with his fam. Sounds like a Little House On The Desert situation to me. So, what exactly about him is misogynistic in praxis… like what does he do to dem hos other than lambast them on a forum. I know at least one of his crew is a female (his old lady) and he ain’t beaten her - and i know em… he ain’t that guy… like bro wouldn’t even have that secret concealed woman hater side to the degree of wishing or intending them harm that all closet misogynists and incels have. Bro’s just a sour grapes guy… died in the wool Capricorn and you know how cynical those fuckers are. And that can even impress and attract a certain kind of lass… perhaps his wife, who found his general intelligence, work ethic, and macabre humor attractive. Bro could even be a sexy beast, what with all that hard labor at the farms. I haven’t seen em in about 18 years when he was wearing those black skulls on red sleeveless shirts that guys who load onto greyhound buses with green military packs and listen to Ministry wear. He was young and fresh then and not yet worked like a mule. A young lad trying to find his way out of very bad home and fam circumstances both financially and socially.

With no real developed skills yet he would set out into an unknown world until one day finding himself on the southeastern coast of the U.S. sleeping on the floor of a converted hotel room into a bed bug infested studio apartment occupied by a promethean, a sexy young beast from the orange state, and a quaket parrot named Midget. This was the first chapter in the biography of a lower working class american man’s trials and tribulations in a country that just entered a bust cycle with the 2008 crash… and he felt every effect if it. Job scarcity, sexy beast scarcity, housing scarcity and overpricing, Literally walking into an economy that just sank with nothing but a greyhound ticket, backpack, a Walkman and some heavy metal CDs. “Go” said the voices of the Fates. Your time is now, Mr. Authoritarian. Travel Weary Capricorn

1 Like