This woman should be arrested for glorifying terrorism

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4945764.stm

Here we have a brand new law, glorifying terrorism, and this woman is getting away with being charged with ‘causing a public nuisance’. What’s the point of having ridiculous laws if you’re not going to use them?

On a brighter note it’s good to see that the BBC are still treating any murder of a black person as racially motivated whether or not there’s evidence for that tag…
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/4945972.stm

To be fair, it’s also the line the police seem to be taking:

As for the incident in Shepherd’s Bush, I imagine this lady is going to be in quite a bit of trouble.

mmmmmmmmmmmmm… Hammersmith … oh

Anyways, so exactly what is the racial motivation? What precursory words were used, that explain away random attack by known felons?
Didn’t the story say a “29 year old white man” was also stabbed? Is there no connection between the black child and the white man?

Seems rather shoddy reporting at best, bordering on just non-sensical.

On a much brighter note the beloved Deputy Prime Minister, John ‘Two Jags and one middle finger’ Prescott, has admitted to goosing his secretary.

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4945170.stm

I mean, really, ladies (and gay/bisexual men), would you consider this man, even on a really lonely evening?




Ahem, nothing involving any “position” with this individual could be considered “civil” although, by definition, “servile” might pass.