I was wondering if you can specify permissions nad the user and group ID’s when making the command. Whatever I do, it doesn’t seem to let me se tthe user unless I put it in the fstab and do a remount -a
Thanks.
your post count:
666
Evillll!
[size=75]eeee[/size]eeee[size=150]eeeeeeeee[/size][size=184]eeeEEEEVILLL![/size]
The three stoojez were the trinity.
The father son and the holy ghost,
reincarnated.
The pope poops in the holy water, too!
That’s my revilation for the evening!
I’d be happy to try and help you with bash or anything similar, but you’d need to be more specific about your problem.
Only half the original message posted lol, and then when I re-wrote it to submit last night, my dad unplugged the wireless router because he was going to bed and wanted me off the computer… here’s the deal.
I want to be able to specify a user id and group id (ownership) for a mounted directory while using the smbmount or mount command (with -t smbfs). I’ve tried adding it with the other options, but that doesn’t work. Do I do a -o gid=xxx uid=xxx? The only way I’ve gotten that to work is add the specific details, like rw, uid, and gid in the fstab, and then do a mount -a. The other problem is that since I added these smb shares to the fstab, they try to mount long before runlevel 3 (where networking is activated), so when I log in to KDE (runlevel 5), those shares still haven’t been mounted. I tried to make a shell script that ran on initiation of runlevel 3, but that failed. If you could explain to me how to do these two things, I would much appreciated.
-Patrick C.
invisionfree.com/forums/CPPlearningcommunity/
Here at this forum you can get help learning things like C++.
The people there are very computer-literate.
If you need help like that, maybe ask them, then come back and tell us if it worked?
I cannot comprehend much right now because of my brain probelm, and am unsure what you nee.d
Sorry, but C++ doesn’t have too much to do with learning the detailed options and syntax of bash commands.
Well you will still probably have much more success at that forum then this one if you ask there.
Find a syntax forum? Or something…?
dan despite being obviously insane does have a point,
In, this, philosophy forum perhaps you will receive respones like this:
“Does the syntax based operating system even exist, man?”
Syntax is, for the most part, irrelevant to the OS. All the user typically sees is the frontend. The backend may even try to correct for syntax errors (IE: typing in a url incorrectly).