she don’t read books my nizzle? … yeah u r right… it should read…she DOESN’T. i am glad u corrected it haha.
…
Gads, has philosophy devolved to become completely devoid of empirical knowledge?
Has the “modern philosopher” decided to eschew known facts and place the higher ground on self-approbating suppositions and factless thought experiments?
One hour of study into, separately, anatomy and mirror neurons would render this entire thread nullified.
Males are built to be masculine, and their linear analytic capability is what is best for the hunter, warrior, destroyer of worlds.
Females are built for femininity, and with a third more mirror neurons, and less notable physicality are superior in sociality, both for the male, and for children.
Genetics decided long before the first hominid to “wonder of things”, that males and females were to be different of traits, as the most advantageous model.
Trying to turn one into the other, to support some fallacy of sociality and morality, that equality, fairness and benevolence actually have a space in pragmatic reality ~ is destructive delusion.
Is this the “New Age” Philosophy?
It is nice to see you back Mastriani. Whenever I see you name I click and I am usually rewarded. I wasn’t aware that any of the philosophy I studied was based on empirical knowledge. As you said in ‘Power’ and Sauwelios, I thought it was at “most entertaining”. That’s why I began looking for the bio-philosophy.
If we’re talking about American Modernism, it’s basically politics… dishonest politically correct rubbish…
Mastriani- I think we just like Cezar’s style- like some empirial swordsman as the picture shows.
I’ve been trying to make sense of the thread myself, and get fairly lost.