The evolutionary psychology of women in terms of relationships and sexual reproduction is one of prostitution.
All women care about is money, property, power, social affluence, and the occupational status of men where there is no such thing as sexual equality or romance.
i dont think it’s evolutionary, because theres no such thing as occupations in evolutionary terms.
Evolutionary speaking, women are primarily attracted to men who are gung-ho, women are attracted to barbarian moments, that is why women often find themselves getting knocked up by dudes who abandon them and women are left to care of the babies on their own. It has little to do with rational thought. Hell, you should know this, you posted a comic about it. Women marry based on status, they fuck based on barbarian moments.
Its really a retarded situation. Women fuck dudes they view as disposables and never talk to them as human beings, and women talk to men as if they are human beings, but then never actually fuck them. It’s utterly retarded. Men have to litterally dumb themselves down and tread carefully, in order to not disturb the barbarian mode, but at the same time, act like they are not treading carefully, or else risk women treating them as surrogate friends.
If you’ve got a group of all men, and women are half of the population and are buying all of the products, how can you say you have the very best team?
It is not sexist or have anything to do with feminism, it is common sense.
In beauty, the senior levels of management are still majority men.
As women are often accused of being ‘gold diggers’ this would probably be the male version in the context of what I am saying.
Human nature for the male and female in this respect, does not differ that much. Besides what does it matter if a person is after another’s wealth. No amount of cajoling will make the other ‘come good’ if they don’t want to. I remember seeing a movie, (can’t remember the name of it). There were two lovers who never came together for various reasons, both went on to have lives with others. Years on both their partners died. The woman was left quite wealthy, lived in a big house. The man was living in a council flat(?) with only a small pension.
They met by accident one day and still felt the same way about each other. She suggested he move in with her, as she said, “I have a comfortable home, big enough for more than the two us”, he was reluctant to do this, as he was concerned that people would accuse him of being a ‘gold digger’. Time went by and both were miserable. Eventually it was resolved. He did move in with her and both probably lived happy and fulfilled lives. Even though there was an imbalance in their fortunes, this situation, I believe was happily resolved.
That wasn’t a man, because men don’t care what other’s think. Men don’t avoid women because they are afraid of their friends thinking of them as gold diggers.
Therefore, since that was not a man, that data cannot be used in our analysis.
That’s not my expirience. Most men care very little if a woman is financially secure or not. In fact if a woman is financially insecure the man will offer helping her get back onto her feet. Good luck trying to get the same reciprocity back from women with men. Majority of the time it never happens. That’s because the main focal point of men is companionship where with women it is something completely different entirely.
I am the kind of guy that I would never judge a woman on the grounds of being financially insecure. If she was a waitress poor for her entire life I wouldn’t care.
I know women are evil because in my own woman like mind, my sex fantasies always follow the same exact formula.
Someone I have a crush on appears to me. We argue about some issue. We both lose our tempers. I lose control of the situation, and they gain power over me. Then sex happens. Or, the other way around, where I am the one who does it.
Its the same exact formula.
Now you might say, that is just you, not all women are like that. Actually, every single sexual woman on earth is like that. Only asexual (masculine) women are not like that.
Love and lust is feminine as hell. A man in lust and love is a feminine man indeed.
Now you might ask why is that evil. Love is the prime evil in of itself, it is a mental disease. Secondly that kind of sexual mechanism is evil for several reasons. It is evil because it makes women walking liars who tell men to not do those kinds of things to them, because that is not the way to the woman. Women date only assholes then tell men not to be assholes in order to date a woman. So they are liars. Second, it is evil because it doesnt take into account the mans feelings, it only values the womans feelings and her needs. Third it is evil because it encourages evil behavoir, and makes barbaric moments the prime way of sex, and not rational or reasonable moments. Fourth, evil is a turn on for them often. Fifth, you should think it about it yourself, you should figure out on your own mind why it is evil.
Creativity, aesthetics, ideals, valor, honor, challenge, excitement, truth, etc.
Now, don’t get me wrong, women care about aesthetics too, infact men without feminine traits cannot appreciate aesthetics. However there are some slight differences between the two entities.
