Probably, aye.
15 characters.
This does not answer my question. Do you know what a principle is?
More or lessā¦ why are you asking me?
I was just curious since you were talking about first principles. My own definition is a general truth on which other truths depend. In the case of an axiom, it would be a universal principle on which all truths depend.
That may or may not be flip-flopped. Depending who you ask.
I kept at it with Copilot and they are building an all out taxonomy. but I feel like thatās getting too down in the weeds and asking people to agree on too much that is notā¦.my focus.
The original post has been updated with this^ and the three axioms in my last reply.
Triadic First Principlesā¦based on |Platoās psycheā¦
Subject - willful, intentional, needy
Objective - goal, promising satisfaction to the subject, ideal,
Effort - distance, resistance to be overcome for the subject to attain its objectives.
Do you think of his triadic personhood (ground) in terms of the original, though?
There is no originalā¦no Platonic ideal.
Everything is fluid.
Overestimating or underestimating either of the three points in the triangle, will bear a costā¦to the subjectā¦
Survival of the fittest.
In modern systems errors in judgment is protected and warped by systemic interventions.
This has a cost, as wellā¦like compounding unfit mutations, resulting in the insanity of transsexualism.
Really? Even the fluid/fluidity isnāt original? Not really sure youāve thought this one through.
Fine. Itās my fault because I said his instead of their.
ā¦but you do realize you come off sounding very ā¦ wait ā¦ are you talking about memetic mutations?
Please explain what this phrase means when applied to animals that depend on social grouping like humans.
Is wealth a measure of fitness?
Wealth is a measure of group approval.
In the American Empire of Lies, it is a substitute for salvation.
Money = Messiah.
Salvation from what?
Natureās injusticesā¦ Modern Americanized individuals use money - gained through submission, ironically - to compensate for an impoverished genetic inheritanceā¦to put it bluntly, what they lack in physical and mental fitness markers they make up for with money.
From natural selection we get social selection, and females continue to be the filtering agencies.
What is social behavior?
A compensation for individual lack.
Through collectives individual disadvantages are converted into advantages.
Moral behavior is found among ALL social species, or all species that practice cooperative survival and reproductive strategies.
Man simply encodes these behaviors - converts them to words/symbols, and then makes amendments to facilitate larger cooperatives that would not normally, naturally, have developed in the wild.
Such manmade and maintained environments are often antithetical to natureā¦offering salvation to individuals that submit to them.
I have no argument against any of that
Why would anyone have an argument against the truth?
I donāt make this up, nor do I benefit from itā¦ I report it.
I guess Iāve just seen āsurvival of the fittestā used as an excuse for financial gluttony so much in my travels that it compels me to ask what is meant by it. Maybe I was expecting the stock answer, pleasantly surprised not to receive it.
Nature is governed by natural selection - advantageous mutations are passed on, disadvantageous mutations are filtered, culled, out of the gene pool.
What we have here is manās intervention upon this processā¦
Natural selection becomes social selectionā¦and what is considered advantageous and disadvantageous is determined by the cultureās ideologyā¦
For creatures like us, cooperation and contribution are desirable traits. But weāve been hypnotised to believe the opposite, that vast personal accumulation is a sign of great strength.
I do think that people are waking up to this though. I call the thieves corpos, know why? Because there are lots of derogatory terms for the less fortunate: trailer trash being one of them, but what do we call the pigs at the trough? Not many bad words there to choose from. Funny that.
To find out who is in charge is pretty easy, just need to observe who we are not allowed to criticiseā¦
As long as you understand that this is a sign of weakness.
Accumulation is a sign of Hebraic slave ethicsā¦the miser collects and hoards.
In pagan culture they displayed strength by splurging their wealth.
Hoarding is a sign of weaknessā¦insecurity.
Theyāre going to fail. The younger generation is getting wise to them. The corpos still think that 1980ās yuppie culture is a thing.
Weāre heading towards a distributed system, because the internet is distributed, and thatās the new information substrate.
The old hierarchies are being shrugged off, they will either reconfigure and adapt, or collapse. Many in the US believe that the way their country is run and what they āvalueā is mostly the same abroad. It certainly is not.