¡Betta represent!
You claim to know the difference between good and bad…your starting philosophical claim is that good is bad and bad is good and therefore no moral absolutes exist.
How do you know this?..you don’t…its a religious fanatical guess which doesn’t concur with everything cancelling out because you exist because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist so if you claim that you don’t exist then you are merely a liar that exists.
Proving that as a very minimum you are a lifeless binary processing biological machine that exists and claims things.
Why do you claim in your existence (because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist) that your claims are a misrepresentation of reality?
It’s hardly a selling point for your religion is it?
Well, I said quantum computers should be able to do true random—namely, if the Copenhagen Interpretation is accurate. But note what I last said about that interpretation:
‘Willing to accept’, ‘metaphorically speaking’: for me the Copenhagen God is a fitting representation of my Philosophical Neutralism: he has metaphysical free will, (but) no preference one way or the other!
You exist (because you need to exist to claim that you don’t exist) and you claim that your religious fanatical claims are a misrepresentation of reality and therefore don’t represent reality.
There is nobody more extremist in their religious fanatical claims than you.
Again, it depends on what you mean by “exist” and by “represent”.
From what I read of you, a little while ago, I’ve got the impression that anyone who does not share your Christian belief in the immortality of the soul, absolute good and bad (or evil), etc., is taken by you to claim they don’t exist, to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion), etc.
But why would one have to have an immortal soul to claim not to have an immortal soul?
You need to exist to claim that you don’t exist…so you exist and you claim that everything is a misrepresentation of reality,even your own claims,Self-Lightening.
I’m merely highlighting what you claim in your religious fanaticism because you are clearly not aware of it yourself.
Don’t pretend that you’re addressing me personally. You’re telling me exactly the same thing you’re telling everyone—and no one, in your OPs…
Every attempted representation is always a misrepresentation in the sense that what represents is not the same as what is represented…
You probably don’t exist in the way you want to exist, can’t bear this, and therefore need to claim you and everyone who confronts you with that do exist in the way you want to exist… Really trying to convince yourself, of your eternal life and your perfect representation and the goodness of your reality…
But you claim in your existence that everything that you have posted is a misrepresentation of reality Self-Lightning.
I don’t pretend to be something I’m not,like you.
I exist and I am a representation of reality (a non illusion) not a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion).
You don’t seem to be very sure of yourself in your religious convictions.
P.s.The Three Axioms of Unity in Distinction:
(inclusive of personhood)
It’s called triadic or trinary mutual entailment, or the correct use of the word “essentialism” (neither static, nor bare).
Jesus summed it all up- he said that his father was the ONLY true God…
Are you a oneness pentecostal, JW, or a different … denomination/religion? I was attempting to grab the passage you alluded to & my browser activated Copilot. Not sure why that happens sometimes & not all the time. I could quibble with Copilot on a few details, but this is close enough:
Alright, so you’re claiming that a person named Jesus—apparently the most significant person named Jesus for you—claimed that his father was the only true God. Noted!
1 Like
You don’t pay attention to Jesus?
You didn’t stop beating your wife?
There’s more to it than that. John 17: 1 and 3 does provide the decisive teaching of Jesus regarding who the true God is when he declared " .. that they may know you, the only true God .." . Jesus also emphasized the significance of this knowledge because eternal life is dependent upon it. So there would be no mistaking of who Jesus introduced as the true God. If Jesus was included in a so called godhead of a triune God, then he would have clearly declared it: " .. that they may know you and me and the holy spirit as the only true godhead.
It’s imperative that not only must we pay attention but also obey his teachings which include knowing God properly:
"In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power."
2 Thes 1:8-9
You didn’t direct your question at me, but if you wanna start a new thread or revisit an old one, I have 50,000 books that go into this.
1 Like