To get drawn into an argument on things that don’t exist would make me an even bigger fool than the third, and that also includes arguing over theories by the mere fact that they are just that… theories.
You can’t advance without discussion of what exists, does not exist and what is believed to exist. It doesn’t work that way. A fool is one who’s ego has consumed them. They believe themselves to be smart and great.
Why would it be foolish to assume something does not exist if there was/is 0% evidence?
Hmm, well there seems to be a sad lack of bathtubs for so many rubber ducks. You gotta have at least 1 tub per 2 rubber ducks or they don’t exist as rubber ducks.
You declared their existence and now you say there are three. Yet no tub, how can there be three or one without a bathtub, I’d settle for bubble tubs if you have one and can really prove it exists.