It is the recognition of the political utility that such events have that makes them seem like false flag events, whether they are or not. In this case, the attempt on Donald Trump’s life has galvanized support for him, which may well help him to get reelected. And it did so in a way more powerful than any of the conventional campaign strategies could have. There’s a just so quality to it. It seems too good (In a political sense )to be true. That’s why it seems naïve not to recognize that it’s a false flag. So the question is do myth making events ever actually happen to public figures or are they all staged or false flags? And how can we tell the difference?
As far as I can tell Trump has been selected to be a viable next president, although of course the world controllers have multiple plans ready for any eventuality. But if Trump does win or is allowed to win, it won’t change anything in the longer term. The goal and end-games are still the same, just the means and routes to them may vary.
Like playing chess, you try to allow yourself multiple pathways to checkmating the opponent. It doesn’t really matter which route you chose, as long as you got to the destination you had in mind from the start.
So start asking yourself what the destinations might be, the end-games behind all these political circuses, false flags and media nonsense hysterics? Focus less on the short-term deviations along the pathways and routes based on this or that outcome, and try to see further into the future. Where do the paths converve down the road?
It’s probably an approximate known point of convergence , without superlative description of how far such can be simulated in to the future, depending on current events recycled on a minute to minute basis.
translation for us common folk:
It’s an educated guess.
If that could be downgraded from an unassuming flow, then my name , meno, would certainly be compromised in the scene of things, as if certainty could be assured say hypothetically.
Assuming the question to be a test, leaving that to the Other(s) to decide for themselves.
Oh, but that’s being unfair to the General, truly who , for which, being in certain limited debt.
Hero? Villian? Antihero?
"What stuck were repeated suggestions that Trump survived the assassination attempt by divine intervention and referring to him as an “American lion,” “the Braveheart of our time” and a fighter. "
So every time I target shoot and miss the bullseye it must be divine intervention.
I thought it was me that missed the bullseye but it was God F’n with me.
After Saturday, Trump’s Devotees See ‘God’s Protection’
Some of Donald J. Trump’s followers had long viewed him as handpicked by God. The attempted assassination has only increased such quasi-religious devotion and rhetoric.
After all it takes Divinity to claim to be able to shoot bulls eye in broad daylight on Madison Avenue, and not be reprehensible.
Ya ya ya
But then there is something Arminius said about Dems coming in that really sank in but it may generally , (within ILP) be not recalled , as far as such equivocations.
Anybody? Yes/no answer suffices
If Trump loses, his followers will go violent asking , “How could the Dems defeat him in a fair election when God chose him in July?” Still, to me that’s preferable to four years of Trump and Vance dismantling what there is of democracy and the rule of law. Meanwhile, Biden and the Dems are busy self-destructing.
Hahaha.
Seriously though, this shooting was obviously setup ahead of time as a false flag event. Who is still naive enough to actually trust these things are authentic?
Believe it or not, this is the first thing that came to me when I heard and saw what happened.
It is unbelievable to me the people who we trust and idolize DESPITE what we have discovered and know about them.
Felix Dakat,
A hero is a person who battles against the enemy with determination, courage, and defiance as Trump has battled the liberal establishment.
A hero is also one in the eye of the beholder.
A real hero ALWAYS fights for what he believes is absolutely right - for the good of all -not for what can be gained for self.
Is a real hero always trustworthy? Can he or she always be depended upon to do the right, ethical and moral thing? Can a real hero ever intentionally betray one’s mission in life?
An antihero then? Or a villian?
An antihero then? Or a villiain
On a scale of one to ten, the ten being the strongest, I would have to say as an antihero a 2 (maybe) and as a villain maybe an eight.
Potential always means a lot and the story is still unfolding.
A betrayal of trust in different forms muddies the waters and destroys confidence.
It becomes like a giant rockslide.
Would someone who is a real hero be seen in that way? A real hero always tries to do the RIGHT thing.
Of course, there are those who are blind because they feel the need to romanticize some others - for different reasons.
lol An anti-hero is a far cry from being a villain.
So is Trump an antihero or a villian?
Right before he was shot (grazed), Trump was talking about something sad regarding the problems at the border. Was the shooter listening?
What did the shooter want that was in conflict with what Trump wants?
How do their definitions of “great” differ?
Did he think he was on a mission from God? That would mean from his POV he was the hero and Trump was the villain.
Bret Stephens agrees that Trump has attained mythical status for hi followers. “The G.O.P. ceased to be a normal political party in 2016 and became a cult of personality, less interested in winning elections than in burnishing the savior-victim myth of its charismatic leader. As a cult, the party could never realistically allow any other Republican to successfully challenge Trump for the nomination. And as a nominee, Trump would only gain strength once the extent of President Biden’s mental decline became obvious.”
Republicans at the Convention are using religious language to refer to Trump. “God spared Donald Trump with the purpose of calling us back to our destiny as a Christian nation.”
self=other does not need the endorsement of a government/state, which is seen as valuable only for its facilitating of self=other & the rebalancing back to it (such facility as you would appreciate if you knocked things off balance & needed correcting… like a turtle turned upside down in the water… because a state in alignment with self=other would not allow things to be knocked off balance like that, and anyone that did do that would feel like a turtle turned upside down in the water… that needs correcting, unless it refuses… lest it drown)