Trump enters the stage

I don’t think there is one, though there may be many. I think the same for the Hungarian premier, who plays a similar game , and there are shifting occurances going on , some in real and some in intrusive ‘think-tank’ levels, a kind of virtual ping pong match, that change constantly.

Some holders on consider this a moratorium, but some raise suspicions about such goings on. For all the affronted, dalliance, mischief that suspects manipulation by higher ups, the President must look like a President, a proficient negotiator, appearing as if he was at the helm of an all consuming power.

This is not really so, as before it was Lawyers and War hero’s who were believed to be capable of being believable , now it’s actors and wealthy success stories who make the grade.

The fact that Trump belong to the immense wealth club, gives confidence to those who have something to loose, if such figureheads go uncontrolled. The same story with Hitler, big businesst trusted him, and his opportunistically misleading national socialistic cover.

Acts are always believable, if the movers and the shakers know they have enough wiggle room to manage a dictator, they say that the ‘doctors’ who attended Stalin used Beria’s assasination as a cover to do away with him.

And who do you think was funding Hitler at the time?

And who do you think is funding Trump now, and also funding the democrats?

Who, who would fund both sides? Oh that’s just… CoNsPpiRacKIeSs!!

It’s Das Capital, who turned the synthesis into a materialist equivalentce ,that germinated historical economy since before the 19th century, it started in Germany and spread out globally.

The precedents were evident even before that, as instinctually thinkers like Hobbes, Bacon and others must have felt the turbulence of being at the top of the economic global foodchain and verily felt that the slide downwards was to be inavoidable; and who started it? The fledgling colonies of the

Who would or could? Trump is being portrayed as a newer version of a Nazi prototype, in his unjustified attack, bordering on concerns for his mental health, as he is sowing made up narratives to inflame an already roused up divided nation to violence.

In this latest outrage, cemetery officials had an unspecified altercation with the Trump team over government policy to prohibit :movie_camera: photography on federal cemetery land for political purposes.

In any case, the blame game , once it crosses federal rules and policy, is not a good sign for the voting public, regardless who finances it.

The latest tit for tat game between the political and military issues that play the cat and mouse game until and maybe after the election are two fold;

At the top of the list is this old game that are near mindless of they think is a mindlessly broad public issue:

“ e Supreme Court Just Signaled What It Will Do If the Election Is Close

AUGUST 29 2024 7:18 PM

The legal warfare over the 2024 election is well underway. The MAGA shenanigans of the Georgia election board have overshadowed disturbing developments in Arizona. Last week, the Supreme Court signaled it would revisit an issue it had settled over a decade ago, allowing a new Arizona law to go into effect requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. Reopening the issue at the last minute and after registration has begun, the justices are fomenting a false public narrative that noncitizens are a threat to U.S. elections. This is the latest signal that the justices are in cahoots with former President Donald Trump and may be prepared to meddle in the election—unless it is decided by margins too large to tamper with…”

The second apparent saber rattling has been done many times, suggesting it to be more a scare tactic , to ibuild on the fears of an already fearful public, but then who knows if there is not an element of earnestness behind it, after all… And talks of being able to limit such suggestion to mere rhetoric, may well miss it’s mark,

WORLD

August 27, 2024 1:52 PM UTC

Russia warns the United States of the risks of World War Three

Summary

Lavrov says the West is playing with fire over Ukraine

Russia is clarifying its nuclear doctrine, Lavrov says

Lavrov talks about the dangers of World War Three

Spy chief: we don’t believe the West over Kursk

Russia said the West was playing with fire by considering allowing Ukraine to strike deep into Russia with Western missiles and cautioned the United States on Tuesday that World War Three would not be confined to Europe.

Ukraine attacked Russia’s western Kursk region on Aug. 6 and has carved out a slice of territory in the biggest foreign attack on Russia since World War Two. President Vladimir Putin said there would be a worthy response from Russia to the attack.

Sergei Lavrov, who has served as Putin’s foreign minister for more than 20 years, said that the West was seeking to escalate the Ukraine war and was “asking for trouble” by considering Ukrainian requests to loosen curbs on using foreign-supplied weapons.

Since invading Ukraine in 2022, Putin has repeatedly warned of the risk of a much broader war involving the world’s biggest nuclear powers, though he has said Russia does not want a conflict with the U.S.-led NATO alliance.

“We are now confirming once again that playing with fire - and they are like small children playing with matches - is a very dangerous thing for grown-up uncles and aunts who are entrusted with nuclear weapons in one or another Western country,” Lavrov told reporters in Moscow.

“Americans unequivocally associate conversations about Third World War as something that, God forbid, if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively,” Lavrov said.

Lavrov added that Russia was “clarifying” its nuclear doctrine.

Russia’s 2020 nuclear doctrine sets out when its president would consider using a nuclear weapon: broadly as a response to an attack using nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction or conventional weapons “when the very existence of the state is put under threat”.

RUSSIA’S RESPONSE

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said earlier this month that the assault on Russia’s Kursk region showed that Kremlin threats of retaliation were a bluff.

Zelenskiy said Ukraine, because of the restrictions imposed by allies, could not use the weapons at its disposal to hit some Russian military targets. He urged allies to be bolder in their decisions about how to help Kyiv in the war.

Russia has said that Western weaponry, including British tanks and U.S. rocket systems, have been used by Ukraine in Kursk. Kyiv has confirmed using U.S. HIMARS missiles to take out bridges in Kursk.

Washington says it was not informed about Ukraine’s plans ahead of the surprise incursion into Kursk. The United States has also said it did not take any part in the operation.

Putin’s foreign intelligence chief, Sergei Naryshkin, said on Tuesday that Moscow did not believe Western assertions that it had nothing to do with the Kursk attack. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said the involvement of the United States was “an obvious fact”.

The New York Times reported that the United States and Britain provided Ukraine with satellite imagery and other information about the Kursk region in the days after the Ukrainian attack.

The Times said that the intelligence was aimed at helping Ukraine keep better track of Russian reinforcements.

Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin; Writing by Lucy Papachristou; Editing by Mark Trevelyan and Alex Richardson for Reuters.

Moving on:

https://apple.news/Aa2PxBXCJT2WhoMr-

()()()

The only reason I posted this is because it has resonance, an echo effect to some weird internal cover relating the two men.

()

The following article leads to the assumptive question:

Is Trump commenting as he does because the Republicans generally feel that the other side of the isle is so mixed up, as giving him no option but interfere in that calamitous disarray to save America?

Maybe the melting plot is failing and flailing fast?where does truth lie?

($)

?

POLITICS

Donald Trump Basically Admits to Interfering in 2020 Election, Makes Clear He Won’t Hesitate to Do It Again

Nothing to see here, just Trump claiming he had “every right” to interfere in a federal election.

When special counsel Jack Smith reindicted Donald Trump last month on accusations of interfering in the 2020 election, he undoubtedly assumed the ex-president would have something absurd and incomprehensible to say about the charges, as is Trump’s wont. What Smith probably didn’t expect was for the 2024 GOP nominee to effectively admit to the crimes he’s been accused of—and claim breaking federal law is fine. But…surprise!

In an interview with Fox News that aired on Sunday night, Trump insisted that he had “every right” to interfere in the 2020 election, telling host Mark Levin: “It’s so crazy that my poll numbers go up. Who ever heard you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election, where you have every right to do it—you get indicted and your poll numbers go up?”

It is, of course, not actually true that Trump had “every right” to interfere in the last presidential election. As Representative Ted Lieu, speaking for many, wrote on X, “Dear @realDonaldTrump: Are you seriously this stupid? You think President [Joe] Biden has the right to interfere in the upcoming election? Do you want VP [Kamala] Harris to do what you tried to get former VP Mike Pence to do? Are you really this dumb? Also, interfering in elections is illegal.” On CNN, attorney George Conway called Trump’s remarks on Fox “an admission that he tried to interfere with the election and that he wasn’t trying to enforce federal law,” adding: “And that’s a crime.”

Obviously, reasonable people who lived through the last election and its aftermath—which included a violent riot in a last-ditch attempt to keep the then president in power—already know that Trump tried to overturn his loss to Biden. More worrisome is the fact that, with basically two months until the 2024 election, the guy who couldn’t admit he lost last time around is out here claiming it’s perfectly fine to try to overturn a result you don’t like. Which very much suggests he will have no qualms about engaging in similar behavior four years later.

Sign up for Vanity Fair’s essential daily brief on culture, news, and style, delivered straight to your inbox.

Meanwhile, this isn’t even the first time Trump has made clear he will very likely pull a 2020 again in 2024. For more than a year now, he’s been laying the groundwork to not accept the election results a second time by:

Selecting a running mate who maintains the false claim that the 2020 election was “stolen” and won’t commit to accepting the results this November

Picking his daughter-in-law to be installed at the RNC, with Lara Trump already sowing doubt about the results of the upcoming contest and talking about prosecuting “cheat[ers]”

Refusing himself to commit to accepting the outcome of the election, regardless of what happens

Convincing his supporters that he alone decides what is real and fake

In other words, don’t be surprised if he pulls the same shit 60-something days from now.

MORE GREAT STORIES FROM VANITY FAIR

Live Updates From the 2024 Venice Film Festival

The “Ketamine Queen” and Matthew Perry’s Hollywood

JD Vance, Fresh Off Doughnut-Shop Debacle, Is Booed at Event With Firefighters

September Cover Star Jenna Ortega Is Settling Into Fame

These Are the Fall 2024 TV Shows That We’ll Be Watching

RFK Jr.’s Whale-Beheading Story Gives RFK Jr.’s Bear-Murder Story a Run for Its Money

From the Archive: Murder at Sutton Place

Access is everything.
Stay in the know with Vanity Fair.

()

If they are confused, where is the grass roots appeal to make sense of this and perhaps the coming debacle?

In a YouTube interview with Lex Fridman last week, Trump admitted that he lost the 2020 presidential election “by a whisker”. At least this shows that he is not always psychotic enough to believe his big lie. At the same time, it shows his responsibility for intentionally misleading his followers and inciting them to violence over a legitimate election.

But then, does that state of affairs that the large portion of the American public is so naive, as to bbelieve the Trumpists position, or, does it show the majority RNC stand grounded on a hidden platform of aspiration, such as under the thin layer of meanings defined by ‘democratic’republican, ‘socialist’ labels?

Then a revival of ‘national socialism’ may hide under the cloak of a synthetic third subliminally dangerous base, ?

Could it be that such labels carry intended yet subliminal ad. Bits?

I wouldn’t say “naive”. They like him. It’s not a conscious rational process. For unconscious reasons they identify with him. Any reasoning verbalized in his support is post hoc. Some people who agree with us may be doing it for the same kind of subliminal “reasons” but we give them a pass for our of own subliminal reasons.

In the context of tonight’s presidential debate, it could be useful to look back how this biased and naively leading comment on what’s with Trump can fit into the equation:

)(

See and observe how the ‘unconscious’appeal works for either of the debaters, if you are planning to watch it, meant played maively erroneously,

)()(

No, thanks. It seems apple news and the wall street journal want to think for us for a price.

1 Like