Drift
(Drift)
June 20, 2006, 4:33pm
1
it seems those similar to each other unite,while those diffrent are repelled for lack of common interest.
see also this thread http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=148571
however what if someone was so unique,that they had no interest group to hang around? they say uniqueness is a good thing.
so what would it be? would you rather be unique and alone,or conformist and accompanied?
Trevor_W
(Trevor_W)
June 20, 2006, 4:38pm
2
i always thought that everyone was unique.
regarding similarities; we are all the same animal so there will always be someone who thinks like you(even crazy people share similar personality traits)
John_Doe
(John Doe)
June 20, 2006, 4:40pm
3
Life is never usually ‘one way or the other.’ You can be unique and still surround yourself with a bunch of common nobody’s. Hell, I do…
Drift
(Drift)
June 20, 2006, 5:10pm
4
i agree. still i cant really associate with people as much as i’d want, as they are all running the secular rat-race.
that and i have taste.
Dan1
(Dan~)
June 20, 2006, 5:27pm
5
Lol. Drift! Your avatar!
Anyways:
Both a retard and a geneous are unusual, unique, wierd, etc.
The idea that unusual = bad, is a very shallow mental protocal.