Unique or conformist?

it seems those similar to each other unite,while those diffrent are repelled for lack of common interest.

see also this thread http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=148571

however what if someone was so unique,that they had no interest group to hang around? they say uniqueness is a good thing.

so what would it be? would you rather be unique and alone,or conformist and accompanied?

i always thought that everyone was unique.

regarding similarities; we are all the same animal so there will always be someone who thinks like you(even crazy people share similar personality traits)

Life is never usually ‘one way or the other.’ You can be unique and still surround yourself with a bunch of common nobody’s. Hell, I do…

i agree. still i cant really associate with people as much as i’d want, as they are all running the secular rat-race.

that and i have taste.

Lol. Drift! Your avatar! :laughing:

Anyways:
Both a retard and a geneous are unusual, unique, wierd, etc.

The idea that unusual = bad, is a very shallow mental protocal.