Unwarn me, I was falsely warned for no reason.

Meta
81

:astonished: :laughing:

82

(I notice you’ve been here seven years, congratulations!)

You’re welcome to start whichever threads you like, but I’m merely referring to your standard belly-of-the-beast conflicting-goods post about abortion. In the last 6 months:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=193115&p=2675646#p2675646
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=193205&p=2675904#p2675904
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=193244&p=2676473#p2676473
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=193244&p=2677323#p2677323
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=186929&p=2677671#p2677671
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=186929&p=2677930#p2677930
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=193244&p=2679039#p2679039
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=193464&p=2683162#p2683162
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=193475&p=2684674#p2684674

So that’s what it is.

83

You began this — whatever this is – by, well, retorting:

To which I responded:

1] the overwhelming preponderance of my posts on this thread [over a dozen] relate to the manner in which folks are warned and banned here at ILP
2] I brought up abortion in responding to Phyllo’s point about AutSider’s “trajectory”. AutSider having been banned for precisely the reasons that I noted in my posts on this thread
3] If I had a dollar for every time a thread at ILP has gone off-topic, I’d be richer than Don Trump thinks he is

I’ve also acknowledged to K. above why I tend to focus the beam on abortion.

Let’s take this to a new thread. Otherwise, we are continuing an exchange here that is clearly off topic.

There you can elaborate on both my “hobby-horse abortion discussion” and my “standard belly-of-the-beast conflicting-goods post about abortion”.

What in particular makes you react to them as you do? How are your own arguments regarding abortion not embedded in a particular existential trajectory?