And Western Civilization has already ‘evolved’ or ‘progressed’ far beyond the Boomer generation and their false expectations about the future. The Boomers failed to set up the younger generations for success or adaptability to these new technologies and challenges. This is the primary reason college and “higher edumacation” throughout the West is not worth the loans. The system can no longer properly prepare, nor convince, young men how to integrate or especially why they should.
2 Likes
Chuck Schumer has always been a snake in the grass of the democratic party. That senile geriatric will do anything for votes, I mean anything. Lots of people from his own party despise him, but it has always been the rich donors that has kept him in power throughout time.
Even as a Marxist or a communist I too am a nationalist. My disagreement with neoconservatives and republicans primarily is economics. You guys keep supporting notions of service economy capitalism where it is doing nobody good.
Republicans have declared nothing but war on the nation’s homeless and super poor, for me that is wrong.
I like to think of myself as a savvy individual, I follow all the political discussions inside this nation, even republican or libertarian ones despite huge disagreements.
Nick Fuentes at best is mediocre. The most talented individual your side has is Tucker Carlson and it is ironic seeing him pushed out of the spotlight by Fuentes. Carlson has more political experience than the younger up and new comer.
What I was saying is Christianity doesn’t pose a threat or challenge to Judaism and Zionism. It never really has and watching the video of Fuentes with Carlson together go into arguments Iike “Well, it’s not all Jews.”, was hilarious. They pose minor obstacles to Zionists but nothing spectacular.
With that being said, while I don’t like Fuentes I am one of the few people from the Marxist camp who doesn’t believe in censorship. I believe everyone should be able to speak their minds freely including Fuentes.
In modern Europe presently it is Poland who has the stronger military, not Germany.
The Marxism these postmodern, liberal twats, aspire to is internationalism……Trotskyism. The reason Stalin put a pick axe in his head.
Trotskyites moved to the US where they morphed into neo-con internationalists - globalists.
Poppers open society was adopted to erode the world’s resistances to their messianic plans.
They also trained in the school of Strauss, teaching them how to reinvent history by pretending to be ‘reading between the lines’…conveniently discovering there subtexts that benefited their plans.
1 Like
Exactly and while I represent the Stalinist or Maoist nationalist position of Marxism, in the west it is the international Trotskyists who make up the largest group of Marxists now drowning out nationalist voices like myself.
Over the many decades this international Trotskyism has merged with political liberalism creating many of the absurd political abominations we’re all familiar with today like trans kids and so on. You could describe it as a liberal international Trotskyism.
National Marxists or communists like myself have maintained being conservative over the years, international Trotskyist Marxists tend to be more fully liberal on all issues. It’s a trend I’ve noticed over the decades.
Not all Marxists or communists are the same in ideology, there are differences. To outsiders we’re all the same, that however is not entirely true.
There are more conservative segments of Marxism and communism like myself, we’re just fewer in number.
I am beginning to suspect that the usual players are the ones funding the cartels inside of Mexico where the Mexicans themselves are getting tired or fed up with it.
More male insanity. Males forgot to evolve
More shit-takes about Trotsky deserved to be killed by psychotic Russian brutes because “internationalism”. When international socialism is the ONLY way to save the world economies. When third-world countries can use slave labor to subvert the world economies. Nobody can compete with slave-labor, so obviously socialism must be in every country or else a Socialist country will fall behind (obviously). Mr A are you saying you don’t want socialism in every country?
And when did Trotsky say he wants race-mixing crap and “melting pot” crap. I asked the AI to be sure:
“Trotsky called for labor organizations that could represent both universal interests and the particular needs of minorities, recognizing the reality of both oppression and shared struggle. He worked with Black activists and recognized the centrality of anti-racism in revolutionary work, insisting that white workers shed their prejudices and stand with the oppressed for true class solidarity.
In summary, Trotsky did not have a modern multiculturalist or “melting pot” agenda, but he promoted the social assimilation and equality of minorities as a necessary condition for the unity and success of the international socialist movement. He was consistently opposed to racism and racial discrimination both ideologically and organizationally.”
What, specifically do you have a problem with international socialism about? When I suggested segregation in attempt to preserve diversity, you were quick to disagree about that.
Also according to you, trans-kids politics are an “abomination”, so I’m obviously dealing with brute barbarian sweaty dudebro-Klingon 4chan politics and I shouldn’t even bother with a discussion.
1 Like
Yes, the goal should be socialism in every nation. I just don’t want world government as I view it as a bad thing.
I am a cultural racial pluralist. I also sympathize with ethnic nationalists, but I view racial conflicts as multi layered where there is no simple solution to them concerning human history.
Yes, transsexualism ideology on kids is sick.
1 Like
National socialism? 
1 Like
Not quite, I believe in a multiracial national communism but where there are no liberal anti white crusades. I am a Marxist but I believe Europeans should be respected just like all other cultures should be. I actually want to bring all people together in mutual respect, I just see liberalism as an impediment to that along with economic capitalism.
I am a very conservative communist, like a 1920s communist teleported to the liberal nightmare of 2025.
I think mutual respect between cultures would be great. But is it realistic?
1 Like
China is proposing such a multi-polar world of mutually respecting cultures.
Truth is…true diversity will maintain cultural competitions, proving that cultures are race specific….
Liberals fear this…for ti will prove what they do not want to accept. The results are predictable…since it has already occurred.
1 Like
My ideal government would make it realistic and enforce it through law.
I think if we seal the borders and halt all foreign immigration giving all people adequate wages for marriage along with having families of their own this shared economic prosperity of nation together will significantly lessen racial hostilities everywhere. Ultimately that would be my goal as a national communist.
I also believe people should have their own independent cultural ethnic racial neighborhoods, but also that it is optional or voluntary not mandatory. People have the choice or option offered to them to live in separate cultural districts. Likewise people can live in multiethnic or multiracial neighborhoods as well if that’s what they choose to do. Racial and ethnic integration shouldn’t be forced on people, instead people should have a choice in how they want to live. Forcing people to do things making stuff mandatory or compulsory is a fundamental flaw of liberalism.
There would be Mexican neighborhoods, Latin American neighborhoods, Asian neighborhoods, African American neighborhoods, European neighborhoods, and so on.
All people would be celebrated in cultural ethnic diversity including white Caucasian Europeans. Everyone’s identity would be celebrated and respected equally, there would be no exclusion of anyone.
That would be my hope for an ideal future society. Like republicans or conservatives I also possess several criticisms of political liberalism, it’s just that I do so through the political lens of Marxism.
I am a Marxist critic of political liberalism.
1 Like
Under economic socialism or communism there is no need for unlimited foreign immigration.
Domestic workers are paid adequate wages having a reasonable standard of living for themselves concerning marriage and having families of their own.
In my ideal state people would be encouraged to have large families that way the national population is self sustaining. This wouldn’t be race specific, this would be encouraged of citizens from all races or ethnicities. All races and ethnicities including Europeans would be encouraged to have large families so that the national population has no need for a constant stream of foreign migration.
I would put an end to endless foreign immigration so that way divisions that exists now could turn into peaceful coexistence overtime. My goal would be to heal the nation’s conflicts and divisions so that everybody can enjoy shared national economic prosperity together away from the corporate rule of international capitalism.
I always thought the ideology was supposed to be organic, something kids wanted on themselves.
Forcing kids to crossdress and take estrogen against their consent would be sick, but I don’t believe that’s what anyone is proposing here. The debate is about if a kid demands they want to be a woman, should society allow kids to have any self-agency.
My opinion is that giving them hormones should be allowed, but SRS should have to be until 18 or 21. Hormones are largely reversible but SRS is not. SRS also gives an unrealistic result
I just don’t want world government as I view it as a bad thing.
The UN really doesn’t seem that bad, its mostly America and Israel that want to bully everyone.
2 Likes
This is unrealistic idealism mixed with feel-good nostalgia. The world is already overpopulated, but I do not believe you are a climate change denier…
LGBT should be encouraged worldwide, and especially and more heavily in third-world countries since it is the third-world countries that are outbreeding everybody else. LGBT=less population growth rates.
1 Like
Children are not old or mature enough to make those kind of lifetime irreversible changes for themselves. That’s why transsexualism shouldn’t be pushed on children, neither should homosexuality be either.
1 Like
Outside of the continent of Africa the entire world is going through a fertility crisis.
It’s what happens when you let liberal radical feminism take over the entire world where women are told that if men are not wealthy enough they’re inferior to reproduce with. Modern feminism has been disastrous for mankind the entire world over and sexual capitalism is out of control.
I already stated that irreversible changes should have to wait and reversible changes allowed. I do not like having to repeat myself. I will repeat myself again, SRS is irreversible and hormones are Reversible.
There are many incel males who take testosterone as teens and adults because Nature made them incels. And often this gives them more chiseled features. This obviously proves that estrogen is reversible. Testosterone appears again naturally once estrogen ceases! Reversible.
Feel free to strawman if you wish.
The underlying issue is self-agency and bodily autonomy. Westerners don’t believe in giving kids free-choices or freedoms, and they don’t believe in bodily autonomy. That is why they tyrannically impose circumcision on infants which is IRREVESIBLE most of the time. Furthermore I doubt most westerners are OK with cis males taking testosterone to escape from inceldom either. What westerners want to do is tyrannically circumcize children and force them to live lives of inceldom for the rest of their lives.
Westerners believe in “My Body My Choice” only for adults, so that adults can abort infants and circumcize newborns because westerners believe they own children’s bodies.
That’s why transsexualism shouldn’t be pushed on children, neither should homosexuality be either.
What they are asking for is KIDS to stop pushing around other KIDS, for KIDS to stop bullying other KIDS. For KIDS to stop pushing heterosexuality on other KIDS.
Sounds pretty good to me, white people aren’t allowed to be proud of what they are rn, not allowed to celebrate. Any type of it is called “white supremacy”. And the funniest shit ever is when they say “white people have no culture, they stole it all” meanwhile, let’s count the list of inventions and things caucasians have brought to the table shall we? And not only that, let’s also count the places explored and colonized, conquered and revolutionized.
I’ve no problem with other cultures and races being proud of what they are and have, my problem is when white people try to do it and be proud, they’re torn down and attempted to be made to feel like shit for it, fuck that. It is an issue of respect.
It’s like if you go into someone’s house and they built it up with their own hands and they’re proud of it, then you make them feel like shit for doing it. No one does that. If I go into someone’s house, I try to be respectful asf to them. At the very least, people deserve respect, but it can be lost by how one acts, in a second.
2 Likes