Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything .
====================.
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles,
and frictionless gears?
by Tim Folger
published online July 18, 2008
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.
Inertia and Spin. / My opinion./
Aristotle.
Every object needs force/power/energy for its moving .
If no force, no moving.
2.
Newton.
Of course great Aristotle is right saying that there is no movement
without forces . I respect him very much and I won’t make a
fool myself quarrelling with him. However I can say more and explain
Aristotle’s opinion by the formula F=ma. It means, the force of moving
Object depends on acceleration which it gives to this object’s mass. But
here I have two opportunities /possibilities.
a) The acceleration appears as a result of outside influence.
One body (moving body) interacts with another body (moving or
resting).
b) But if I have only one, single body moving in the straight line
and it doesn’t interact with another body it means that this body
also must have an acceleration. In this situation I don’t know
how the acceleration appears, I don’t know if it is inner
acceleration of body, I know nothing about this acceleration.
But this kind of acceleration must exist and I will name it “inertia”.
3.
Mach.
Newton doesn’t know the reason of inertia, but maybe inertia depends
on all stars, on all the matter in the Universe.
4.
Planck.
Newton’s inertia is very strange, and Mach’s idea too. But if I will take
that our Universe looks like a “black body “ then I can suggest that
must be some very small particle (quant) which can move “inertial “
with constant speed c=1 over a period of time. I will write this “inertial “
moving of quanta by formula: h=Et. But really, it is hard for me to
believe that I am right.
5.
Einstein.
Of course Planck is right. But I don’t like the way he reached the result.
He says nothing concrete about the particle and the reason of this
acceleration’s beginning. I will take another road. If I use the Boltzmann
resting particle (R/N=k ) and give him Wien’s displacement constant (b),
as an acceleration, then the particle will have the Planck’s impulse but
now the formula is h=kb. Planck’s formulas and my own are equal, as they
explain behavior of quant (light quanta) from different point of view.
6.
Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck.
It is all well.
But we can see different kinds of movings in the real Nature And look at
Planck’s formula h=Et. It includes time (t). And time, by its nature, is a
limited parameter. It means that this particle cannot go straight at all time
with constant speed c=1. This kind of moving must be temporary
and can change. So, another possibility is that the particle can spin
around itself and we will write this kind of moving by formula h=h/2pi.
7.
L. de Broglie and Heisenberg.
These two spins of particle are very important parameters, so we will
try to explain all phenomena in the Nature using only these parameters.
…………………….
But, unfortunately, they both didn’t have success. Why did they fall?
Because to use only spin parameters is not enough. The spin
parameters belong to the particle who/ which have/has also another
parameters: speed (c) and volume (a) and all together they can create
particle which we call electron: e^2=ahc. Now using electron and
Boltzmann particle (R/N=k ) it is possible to explain the beginning
of star formation (gravitation) and later all another phenomena of
the Nature.
===============.
P.S.
Someone wrote to me:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is , would win a Nobel Prize. “
I don’t say about myself, I say about this article:
“This article waits for its Nobel Prize.”
Does somebody have another opinion?
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik/ Socratus
socratus.com
wbabin.net/
==========================…
Nothingness. ? !!!
============ ========= =..
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything .
============ ========.
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles,
and frictionless gears?
by Tim Folger
published online July 18, 2008
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless
infinite void.
discovermaga zine.com/ topics/space
discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18 … everything
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
/ Paul Dirac ./
“Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,”
/ Peter Milonni.
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico./
============ ==.
What is the first law of Universe ?
=========.
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
Vacuum is :T=0K.
It is the empty space between milliards of billions Galaxies.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons gluons field .. etc.) was assembled in a single point.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the single
point. The answer is : EMPTINESS- NOTHING.!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
Once there was a Big Bang.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big
Bang ). But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will
change and decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
============ =======.
About the theory of the Big Bang is written
the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the Big Bang.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point".
============ ========= ======.
Conclusion: Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation cannot be
" The first law of Universe."
============ ====
What is the second law of Universe ?
To answer of this question we must ask:
" What geometrical and physical parameters
have the particles in Vacuum T=0K? "
1.
Thermodynamics point.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area of Vacuum
we will to mark with letter N.
When every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
============ =======
2.
Quantum (SRT) point.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Ò=0Ê cease any motion
of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is equal zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Ò=0Ê there are
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Let us take some energy area of Vacuum and mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will to mark with letter M.
When every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest: E/M= c^2,
( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
============ ========= ==
3.
Geometry and Physics.
The Modern Physics was started from two points:
thermodynamics and light.
1.
By studying the effect of thermodynamics, physicists came to the
opinion that the physical parameters like volume, temperature and
density (of particles mass) are enough to discover the laws of
thermodynamics, and they didn’t need to know something
concrete about single particle. But then, soon or later, all mass of
this
particles will stop it’s moving and the thermal/ radiation death
will come. Is it possible? No, it isn’t , some particles will radiate
and then QT evolved from this idea. Now the situation radically
change.
From studying mass of particles in thermodynamics Planck and
Einstein
began to study one individual particle (quantum of energy). It
seams that
it was logical to think about geometrical form of this particle,
but this
did not happen. And still now physicists do not think about concrete
particles, they are concerned about the " mathematical point".
2.
When physicists studied the behavior of light, they came to the
conclusion that light ( light quanta) can sometime be a particle as a
" mathematical point" and sometime a wave as a " mathematical
wave". From behavior of light the SRT was born and here the particle
is also " mathematical point". It is hard to understand, why nobody
think about geometrical form of light quanta if it is real particle.
3.
For many years, physicists used Euclidian (static and firm )
geometry for solving physical problems, and they thought there was
only one geometry.
But Lobachevsky and Bolyai had another opinion.
They thought that to use only Euclidian geometry was not enough to
explain all the effects in the Universe. Why, because our Universe
is not static and firm. The physical processes in Universe change
all the time so the Euclidian geometry also has to change. This lead
Lobachevsky and Bolyai to discover Non-Euclidian geometry which is
not static but elastic.
4.
Between the XIX and XX century, many physicists such Abraham,
Poincare, Lorentz and Einstein came to the conclusion that the
particle (electron) does not have constant mass, energy and length.
This means that an electron is not a firm particle. The electron is
an elastic particle and therefore his geometrical form can change.
All physicists know about this fact and took this fact in their
calculations. But which conclusion can be done from this fact? They
have no answer. Nobody interested about the borders of this changes.
5.
In 1915 Einstein said the mass and speed (moving mass) can change the
geometry of space. (GRT). It means the physics without geometry is a
limited part of science. It means the physics without geometry is
not complete (whole) part of science.
6.
The situation we see today is similar to the years between 1900 and
1928 when QT was created. Nothing changes.
Mathematicians use Non- Euclidian geometry and they do not know
the power of these changes from Euclidian to Non-Euclidian geometry.
They do not interested how these changes came.
And physicists use forces (energy, impulse, …etc) without know
anything about geometrical changes of particles. They do not think
about this. For them the particle is only represented by
a " mathematical point".
After all, they say the situation in QT is crazy, the Nature is
paradoxical. I know why they say this, because one hand “physical
doesn,t know that the other hand “geometrical” does.
7.
Can we understand our " paradoxical” world?
The answer is clear. In the Natural world, physics and geometry
are one unit part in the evolutionary process, and this fact must be
reflected in any future theory of the evolution of matter (as a mass
and as an individual particle).
------------ --------- --.
The Natural world is not a " mathematical point".
Even the smallest object must have a geometrical form.
And on my opinion, only when we begin to think about light quanta as
a particle with a geometrical form we come from image to reality.
------------ -------.
P.S.
Italy. Railway station.
It was more then two hours till the departure of the train.
I went to the café and ordered a cup of coffee. Soon two men
and a very beautiful, slim woman took place opposite me.
They ordered something to drink and one of the man opened a
case of violin and took out a bow. He began to explain something
about a bow , carefully and gently touching it. Then another man
took this bow and also enthusiastically continued this conversation.
For half an hour the bow was passed from one hands to another
following with enthusiastic discussion.
And the beautiful woman looked at bow, at both these men without
saying a word. For half an hour I watched this group with admiration
and excitement. What a class! What a cultural level! What a beauty!
=======================..
And now let’s imagine the bow pressed into a “mathematical point”
and the musicians speak seriously about a " mathematical point "
which must produce a sound from a violin. Everybody will say I
describe an idiotic situation. Well, I agree.
But why don’t anybody say it to physicists when they observe the
elementary particle as a " mathematical point " , without paying
attention to its geometrical form.
==========..
P.S.
When Feynman said " I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. " it was only because nobody took into consideration
the geometrical form of particle.
================.
In 1787, French physicist Jack Charles found out that at
a decrease of gas temperature to 1 degree, its volume decreases
on 1/273 : " Charles’ law ". And when the temperature reaches
-273 degrees the volume disappears.
This law was confirmed by others of physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925)
All these laws (as consequence from the Third Law of
Thermodynamics ) tell, when the temperature goes closer to
zero T=0K, then the particles lose more their volume.
The volume of these particles aspires to infinity.
Unless can it be? No.
It prohibits with the “Law of conservation and transformation
energy”. Its mean, when volume of the particles disappear they
become indefinitely flat circles - phantoms.
So, they can only change its geometrical form and its kinetic
energy and become “flat particles” with potential energy.
These flat particles must have geometrical form of a circle
C/D= pi = 3,14…..So, it is mistaken to think about elementary
Particle as about a “mathematical point”.
What does "indefinitely flat circles means?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the particle in the rest .
============ ========= .
4.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particle in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2=-1.
============ ========= ========= .
The quantum physics approves, that virtual particles
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approves, that “latent mass”, “invisible particles”,
‘missing mass’, ‘dark matter’ exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows that it is.
They say, that 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
They are right.
============ ========= .
We have now whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1 .
============ ========= ========= =====.
Does not anybody see how beautiful
this bouquet of formulas?
============ .
Israel Ssdovnik./ Socratus.
socratus .com
wbabin. net
===============..
And what happens when you assert that Nothing is really something and that something is really Nothing?
How do you view the universe when the empty cavern of dead-space is actually teaming with life and it is our souls that are empty?
Then, how do you approach the universe when gravity both pushes and pulls from a simple relativity or “perspective” of spirit?
Does Time Run Backward in Other Universes?
One of the most basic facts of life is that the future looks different from the past.
But on a grand cosmological scale, they may look the same
By Sean M. Carroll
=========.
“ The universe does not look right. That may seem like a strange thing
to say, given that cosmologists have very little standard for comparison.
How do we know what the universe is supposed to look like?
Nevertheless, over the years we have developed a strong intuition
for what counts as “natural”—and the universe we see does not qualify.”
sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the … imes-arrow
===========…
My question is:
“ Who is right: The Universe or the brain of some physicists? “
===============.
My opinion about “ black hole”
=================================…
A black hole is a region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing,
not even light, can escape its pull after having fallen past its event horizon.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
=========================.
But to give only such explanation of “ black hole” is not complete.
There is another alternative.
There is another interpretation of “ black hole”.
A “ black hole” is not a “region of space in which the
gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, not even light,
can escape its pull “ but……
but region with very small density (critical density : p = 10^-29g/sm^3).
And the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe
is so small (the average density of all substance in the
Universe is approximately less than p=10^-30 g/sm^3)
that the “ black hole” is only a model of our Universe / Vacuum
as a whole .
===========.
Best wishes
Israel
Physics and Consciousness.
Science has demonstrated unequivocally
that our physical reality can not be separated
from our conscious awareness of it.
===========.
1.
Dr. Jahn is the founder of PEAR
(Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research).
princeton.edu/~pear/
From that site:
“The enormous databases produced by PEAR provide clear evidence that
human thought and emotion can produce measureable influences on
physical reality. The researchers have also developed several
theoretical models that attempt to accommodate the empirical results,
which cannot be explained by any currently recognized scientific
model.”
Here is one of his articles that I found interesting:
princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/jahn15_4.pdf
where he discusses scientific problems and models.
I got a chuckle out of this portion where Jahn is beginning to
contemplate panpsychism:
“I once had the privilege of an interview with the Dalai Lama, during
which I asked whether, from his perspective, the devices we employed
in our human/machine anomalies experiments were conscious. After some
reflection, he responded that if we regarded them as conscious, they
were conscious. This somewhat enigmatic but probably profound
criterion stimulated my subsequent rumination on the rampant
anthropomorphism we practice on our childhood toys, our automobiles,
and our computers, and led me to the radical proposition that all
definable entities could be regarded as possessing some form of
consciousness.”
2.
Same Soul, Many Bodies:
Discover the Healing Power of Future Lives
through Progression Therapy (Paperback)
by Brian L. Weiss (Author) “EACH OF US IS IMMORTAL…”
brianweiss.com/
amazon.com/Same-Soul-Many-Bo … 70-9115928
Consciousness and the Quantum Physics.
Dualism of consciousness.
The Problem of Knowledge .
Quantum Theory of Consciousness:
Our computer-brain works on a dualistic basis.
Some psychologists compare our consciousness with iceberg.
The small visible part of this iceberg is our consciousness.
And the unseen (underwater) greater part of the iceberg is
our subconsciousness. Therefore they say, the man uses
only 10% of possibility of his brain.
And if it so, why doesn’t anybody teach us how
to develop our subconsciousness.
I think it is because there are few people who understand
that the processes of subconsciousness are connected
with quantum processes. The subconsciousness theory
closely united with quantum theory.
These quantum processes which take place in lifeless
(inanimate) nature also take place in our brain.
Our brain can be the laboratory in which we can
test the truth of quantum theory.
===== ========
“The conflict between right and wrong is the sickness of the mind”
Light quanta and consciousness / subconsciousness.
========================.
What is connection between light quanta and thought ?
Thought works by neurons interacting in our brain.
Thought is a program creating from combinations
of millions and millions neurons. So we must understand
the connection between light quanta and neurons in our brain.
Before to understand the connection between light quanta and brain
we must know what light quanta is , how brain works and then the
interaction between them.
My opinion.
1.
What is light quanta?
In wikipedia you can write:
It ( QED ) describes some aspects of how electrons, positrons and photons interact.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_ele….
But on my opinion the QED+SRT describe that an “electron, positron
and photon” are one particle – Light Quanta - in different conditions.
2.
Everybody knows that human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How to understand these different states of neurons.
3.
Every neutron has its own electric impulse.
a)
In the state of consciousness all milliards neutrons of brain create an
electromagnetic field , some program of the body’s behavior.
In this situation it is impossible to realize the power of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness all milliards neutrons of the brain
stop their electric impulse and Light Quanta/Electron in this new
condition (superconductivity) has possibility to change old and create
new program of person behavior.
4.
And what is about the speed of Light quanta and thought?
a)
In the state of consciousness when the thought ( person reaction)
runs across the chains of milliards neutrons the speed of thought is
more less then speed of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness then all milliards neutrons of
the brain stop their electric impulse the situation is different.
Free Light quanta can realize its power. The realization is going
with the speed c>1.
=====================…
P.S.
In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:
“the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,
even if the final product is connected with the logical form”.
=====================…
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik./ Socratus.
socratus.com
wbabin.net/
wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf
The mad CERN ’s way.
In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the target. Bomb them!
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the vacuum, in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs its real constants of nature.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator - is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that an accelerator - is first of all the Vacuum.
But this, he has withheld from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinity there is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= … ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree, I shall begin to dig
a base for a huge building (skyscraper),
or if to begin drill ground with 10 km. depth,
will you call me a normal man?
========== … ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to succeed?
As many as the scientists have who aspire to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
===========…
The Universe as whole is Vacuum, at first of everything.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
wbabin.net
wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf
======================================
Hawking bets CERN will not find the God Particle
physorg.com/news140161003.html
====================================================
Eh, most physicists would call it problematic. It’s just that as long as the math works out, they don’t care that the real-world application of the equations is nonsensical.
What is infinity?
Abstraction or Reality?
Speculation or Fact ?
Does infinity have any physical parameters?
================..
The Universe is Infinite Vacuum in the state of T=0K,
at first of everything. Why?
Because it is visual fact.
The Universe as whole is Kingdom of Coldness.
Now the physicists think that this Kingdom of Coldness
in a state of T=2,7K ( after big bang).
But this state is limited and temporary.
Why can it be limited and temporary ?
Because in the Universe astronomers found enormous spaces
without any material mass or energy it means these spaces in state
T=0K. Only mass and energy can warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
But the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
the Universe is “ open”, endless and this small mass can warm up the
Kingdom of Coldness only in it some limited and local points.
Therefore astrophysicists search for “ dark matter” because it will save the
“ law of gravitation “ as a first law of the Universe and it will
warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
The cosmological constant of Universe is zero or near to it.
This physical quantity cannot “ close” the Universe therefore
the Universe is endless.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant
==============..
P.S.
If somebody belief in “ big bang”, he must take in calculation
that T=2,7K expands and therefore T=2,7K is temporary
parameter and with time it will go to T=0K.
=================…
physorg.com/news141317146.html
Questions from this article:
1.
what happened BEFORE the big bang,
2.
whether there was a “before.”
3.
what may have happened in a “pre-big bang.”
4.
“What banged? Where did it come from?”
5.
“Is ours the only universe? If so, how did it come to exist?”
6.
What are :
“the big bounce," “the multiverse,” “the cyclic theory,”
“parallel worlds,” even “soap bubbles.”………
7.
What is: “Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang.”
8.
……
particle smasher might discover extra dimensions
…
What are the extra dimensions: 4-D…etc ?
9.
“ shadow”……
travel between parallel universes ………..( !!! )
and cast a “shadow” that scientists might be able to detect. ……..
The shadow might take…….
/ one more scientific fairy - tale /
10.
Last August, ground and satellite observations revealed
what appeared to be an enormous “hole in the universe,”
a mostly empty region of the sky, 900 million light-years
wide - about 5 billion trillion miles -…………
Where are the gravitational waves here ?
11.
At a Vatican conference in 1951, Pope Pius XII said the big bang was consistent
with church doctrine.
“Creation took place in time, therefore there is a creator, therefore God exists!”
the pope declared.
I changed some quotations.
The theological explanation of the world’s existence
cannot lie at a different level from scientific understanding.
The Materialistic world gets its finite being
from an infinite being. (T=0K )
The universe that cycles endlessly through creation and destruction…
{between the Vacuum and Materialistic world.)
=========================..
Many questions and the answer is one: T=0K.
!!!
==============================…
I’m no physicist, but if the universe is infinite and “T=0K”, then how does this temporary, local anomaly that we call matter and energy come into being, even locally?
=====================================
The Quantum theory says that in Vacuum “ virtual particles “ exist.
And from these “ virtual particles “ real particles can be born.
How can“ The law of conservation and transformation
energy/mass” be keeping?
Higgs boson.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
and
cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/ … 57334.aspx
It is the only Standard Model particle not yet observed.
An experimental observation of it would help to explain
how otherwise massless elementary particles cause matter to have mass.
What will LHC give us: the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?
Magnetic trap is an axial-symmetric magnetic analogue of a black hole.
It is 10^36 stronger than gravitational black hole.
CERNs specialists do not know about the magnetic trap yet. If
microscopic magnetic trap will be made in CERN’s LHC, the Earth will
be transformed into an infinitely thin emptiness, surrounded by
circular current of 6 meter radius. Compare: Schwarzschild radius of
such mass is 0,009 meters.
Minimal possible magnetic trap has mass, which is equivalent to 1 TeV,
or about 1055 masses of neutrons. It has magnetic field, which is
equal to 3*10^16 teslas. Magnetic trap is a magnetic dipole, which can
be imagined as an infinitely thin coil, creating the critical magnetic
field.
Neutrons are smallest neutral magnets and they can be captured by
magnetic trap, ejecting neutrino. Protons are also magnets and they
can also be captured by the trap, ejecting positrons. Neutrons and
protons are fermions, but after neutrino or positron ejection, they
become bosons, - the quanta of stationery magnetic field of neutron
hole.
Half of mass of captured particles goes to the energy of ejected
particles, and the second half goes to the magnetic trap’s magnetic
field. As a result of particle capture the radius of magnetic trap
becomes bigger. It looks as widespreading magnetic soliton.
If magnetic trap of Devil will be made on collider, if the process of
it’s growth will be slow (months, years), you will cry from pane, and
your aggression towards big-bangers, who had made the experiment, will
be much more, than mine aggression now. You will want to cut sir
Hawking and other crazy big-bangers on small pieces.
Now I am forced to convince the prosecutor’s department to open the
criminal case against Rubakov V.A. If you will make the same in your
countries against arrant big-bangers, we will survive. Otherwise we’ll
die, with probability about 50%.
Only crazy people can try to create particles with the rest mass more
then 1000 masses of nucleon. It is possible that in the region from
1000 to 7000 aum, there can be created hundreds types of particles and
resonances. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of
them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter.
Different types of growing particles will work on different forces,
and on combinations of forces.
I hope that mBHs, connected by gravity force, are impossible and safe.
But magnetic traps are 10^36 stronger, and they are the most probable
candidates to explain the majority of cosmic catastrophes – novae,
supernovae… I had understood this only this September.
Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in
strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron
stars can have any masses. My approximate computation shows that the
minimal possible neutron star has a mass, equal to 1055 masses of
nucleons, and such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider.
A month ago the article were published that new strange unexpected
particle was discovered at Tevatron. It decays at several muons, up to
eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I
named it the muon hole.
What will be made the next, the magnetic trap of Devil? It will not
decay, but it will transform us into it’s magnetic field.
Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry
about the safety of LHC must be arrested now, because they are
committing the global terrorist crime now.
Stop Tevatron and close the LHC. Throw out big-bangers from
universities. Big Bang never was. The Universe is ever young.
Hubble constant (H, Hbar) is the mirror reflection of Plank constant
(h, hbar). These both constants are describing the 4d-rotation on
opposite scales relatively us. Precise value of Hubble constant you
can find on my web-site. darkenergy.narod.ru/ That is my Steady
State model of Universe. I worked with this model more than 30 years,
and I did not receive any cent for my work. And now big-bangers want
to kill me, my children, and all of you. Big-bangers want to touch the
particle of God, but thus, they lead all of us into the magnetic trap
of Devil.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:09 PM,
David Rountree
ghost_hunter_ 01@comcast. net wrote:
Frequency is the key to everything.
It can be said a resonance at a frequency mediates momentum exchange
in our kinetic universe. We can say infrared photon pairs exchange
kinetic energy between molecules of a substance and its environment
exhibiting what we call heat, a tiny portion of the total frequency
ranges comprising the energy of the object . If you tell me the
average frequency of photons exchanging momentum between molecules and
radiating from a body, is no different than telling me the temperature
except in the units of measure.
All frequencies together give the total energy or mass of an object
An electron changes momentum only by sending and receiving photons at
particular frequencies unifying the electric and kinetic into a
singular mechanism. It is that a frequency is equivalent to a
momentum (p=h*f/c) on the bottom layer that frequency can be
everything in a world that is fundamentally kinetic. Even when we
push on something, it is resonance by exclusion of common frequencies
in common quantum state, exchanging photons that does the pushing, we
never actually touch the object, photons exhibit momentum exchange and
all momentum exchange is by photon exchange ultimately.
The notion that frequency tells us how often something happens is
wrong. Each photon exchange happens independently, perhaps just once,
it need not be frequent. The photon momentum is exchanged laterally
and transversely (angular) in the exhibition of a space time interval
having a specific time period, t=1/f, and distance, x=c*t. It is the
time delay exhibited not how frequent it is that exhibits the energy,
the space, and of course time itself.
In the unification time is exhibited inversely to energy. High energy
is big and slow, low energy is small and fast. The resonance of
common frequencies becomes frequencies becoming distinct relatively by
momentum exchange obeying Mead’s law that the universe conspires to
prevent there from being two equal frequencies. But what is manifest
is time delay, and space by x=c*t, and seemingly solid matter not
penetrable at wide ranges of occupied frequencies. The time delay
equivalence of energy, e/h, by discrete action locally constructs a
fabric of orderings, serially as time, and in parallel as space.
The frequency tells us the dimension of the space time manifold
exhibited by each event. It does not repeat. It exhibits a single
delay element relatively. It exhibits a lateral and transverse
(angular) right handed or left handed twist in quantum state by
cooperative equal and opposite logical action. A delay element alone
is insufficient for logical action. And, or and not operations plus
a delay. We can expect the universe to be logical, and find the
apparent quantum logical action is universal general purpose logic.
Physically, two one half dimensions are exhibited to one bit of
precision each having one way arrows of a length determines by the
momentum exchanged frequency equivalent. This physical construct
proves general enough to build any conceivable information system and
the universe is not distinct from an information system as far as it
is comprehensible.
Given that quantum systems are information systems, without local
hidden variables, that the quantum logical description is complete,
as both experiment and theory suggest, the logical nature of the
universe is unrestricted. No simple model, restricting logic, as say
only frequency in some fixed dimensions, can be complete. A quantum
system can be constructed to contradict any limited logical system due
to in universal general purpose nature.
In the objective information model, no human ideal is allowed, only
the logical action and associated relative delays are allowed in the
model. anything else is considered fantasy. All quantum
interpretations become superfluous. All that matters is the manifolds
of space time interval exhibited by delays by perspective. The notion
of the policing of information in physical systems has recently been
formalized in the notion of Information Causality,
arxiv. org/abs/0905. 2292
===================== . .
Socratus.
In his book " Isaac Newton " Soviet academician
S. I. Vavilov wrote:
" . . photons with extremely fast frequency . . .
in the experience was observed . . . .
the remarkable phenomenon of transformation
them in … … …electron.
Undoubtedly, reverse process is also possible. "
======== . .
Questions:
Can photon and electron be one and the same particle
in different conditions ?
Can the difference between photon and electron depends
only from frequency ?
============ . .
May 23, 2009.
I think not just frequency, but phasing and polarity will differ.
David M. Rountree, AES
Scientific Paranormal Investigative
Research Information and Technology
www.spinvestigations.org
=========== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548
wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
worldnpa.org/php2/index.php? … ay&id=1372
===================== . .
The God. !!! ???
===================== . .
The God is something Infinity and Eternal.
He exists in every place and in everything.
He is Absolute and Concrete.
What is God?
Can God create our world without physics laws and formulas ?
No.
If God can act only in such way, then what is the first law
( formula, system) from which He begins to create our world?
In my opinion ‘ The theory of Vacuum and Quantum of Light ‘
gives answer to this question.
===================== . .
‘Quantum of Light’ is the Subject, not the Object!
worldnpa.org/php2/index.php? … ay&id=1598
Dr. Cynthia Kolb Whitney
Photons have knowledge in them,
. . .
The Truth itself is hidden inside light.
. . . . .
The relationship between light itself and knowledge is the answer
to the ‘disturbing feelings’ people get in this field, because they
don’t want to admit that if Light was itself Intelligent
there might be religious implications to it.
14 Aug, 2008
Posted by: ron naldoda
Physicists spooked by faster-than-light information transfer.
nature.com/news/2008/080813/ … .1038.html
===================== . .
You seem to have it all figured out.
Have you figured out why it is that light exists in quantum chunks?
/ Vern /
============== . .
According to the Quantum Theory the Vacuum is some kind
of Energetic Space which can create quantum chunks –
virtual particles - energetic particles - frozen light quanta.
The ‘chunks – virtual particles - energetic particles –
frozen light quanta ‘is not a “ pure philosophical concept “
that is never observed in practice.
The Quantum Theory says that :
“ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy /.
=================== . .
Without Aether/ Vacuum physics makes no sense.
========= . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
===================== . .
Could it not be a warticle?
Could have both, does it make sense to call a duck a duck or a chicken a duck or some weird hybrid chuck?
I think the Copenhagen interpretation doesn’t need to define it is one or the other, and so doesn’t. That would be Bohmian or MWI, or something fringe.
The best analogy I have heard is bird on one side cage on the other side spinning toy, if you spin it fast enough the bird appears to be caged. This is the classical description of the photon, the truth is the real description is actually not known directly.
Say that in an advanced forum and they would rape you and leave you for dead.
Since we haven’t directly measured the wave or a photons “natural” state there’s no point in pretending we know what it looks like pictorially, that way lies sophistry and philosophy of the arm waving variety.
Let’s not pretend fringe theories are true here. The Copenhagen interpretation is still the best model, saying otherwise requires you to put your money where your mouth is and prove it.
Socratus I have no idea what you are trying to do here, but you really should study the subject or you will come off sounding like a crackpot at best or a lunatic at worst. Suffice to say unless you have a PhD and therefore could prove theoretically any of your claims I wouldn’t bother making them except as an exercise in imaginative philosophy. Philosophy is fine, but in science as it applies to peer review it’s akin to tentative hypothesis and you are likely to hear the refrain “show me the money.” Or if you were in a Godfather frame of mind you might say “you talk the talk, but you do not walk the walk.”
Nothing you have said though remotely leads to any conclusions you have made, in fact quite the reverse in most cases.