You agree?
The answer depends if the following is true or not.
All mammals are hermaphrodites.
All ILP members are mammals.
All ILP members are virtual.
All ILP members are virtual hermaphrodites.
If there are no absolutes I’d have to insert phrase ‘most mammals may well be’ before ‘hermaphrodites’. You get the picture?
I guess teratomas aren’t hermaphrodites. Yeah not everyone. How about the psychological hermaphrodites, not physical?
Are you interested in that?
Are teratomas mammals? I don’t think so.
Define a psychological hermaphrodite. Then I’ll tell you if I’m interested. I suspect it’s one of those inbetweeners I mentioned but go ahead…
No, nonononono. It is the idea about how much male, how much female is a person’s thinking.
We need rulers to measure that.
Why don’t you try.
We need a hormone measure maybe. That might do it.
Then we need a weighing scale.
We will need more than that. The quality of neural circuits not just quantity. The question though is how much blending is there? Hormones of course but brain structures for sure. I think men hide their feminine side.
Ha, ha, ha teratomas! 
Perhaps brain scan technology coupled with hormone scales. That should do it once and for all.
Why, maryshelley, don’t you know? Those wonderful nipples on men have evolved so that the women who have never satisfied their oral needs through smoking will have something to pacify themselves with. Estrogen be damned!!! And I do not want to hear another word out of you. I know the way your grotesque mind works, mary. 
Grotesque you say? I have run better men through the heart for less. To be sure I create monsters but on this occasion I shall not give you the benefit of the doubt as to your meaning. Removes a gauntlet and tosses down at Evening’s boots.
It’s maryshelley btw.
Do you think men hide their feminine side?
I think the labels ‘man’ and ‘woman’ are not so clear cut as many would have us, or like to, believe.