I asked this question because I think of the 1960s and 1970s with the free love movement and I think that’s what this was somewhat I could be wrong on that but then I fast forward to now and sex is mostly internet based and it costs money for example you have to pay a prostitute or you have to pay a woman to do sexual things for you on a video.
1 Like
There was a short period in the late 60s and early 70s when something like that was real, at least among a certain demographic.
>>And if so why did it die out?
Probably the same reason the hippy movement died out. The reality turned out not to be quite what people were hoping for.
2 Likes
And if so why did it die out?
Conservative shift + AIDs.
But it’s hardly dead. There’s still a lot of sex being had for free. Once you open some bottles there’s no way to get to the cork back in there.
1 Like
Cause it was what liberals always are: A cesspit of literal and mental disease leading to poverty, homelessness, children born to be left on doorsteps (if they survived at all and their mothers didnt abort them), and eventually just culminating in a mass of people that cannot be differentiated from literal animals.
Full of disease, having no moral or ethical standards, led only by emotion and urges, leading a life of pure destruction on impulse, god damn the consequences.
1 Like
You mean as opposed to paying for it? Another absurd ‘question’ from you.
1 Like
Oh right, because ‘right wingers’ don’t have sex or abortions 
They are just hypocritical about it.
That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen you post. Are you drunk?
1 Like
Yeah, lets compare lighting a cigaret to setting a forest on fire.
Conservatives are totally the same as hippies, thats why they died en mass to aids too.
Oh wait…
Dude come on, i get your hate boner for men and the neocons but there should be a line after which you say: Well yeah, my side has a tendency to fuck things up beyond reproach too.
1 Like
fwee … if you swap this dude out w Westley…
1 Like
I think this is fucked up. The constant complete dehumanization of liberals. Your utter binary thinking on the issue. Your sick hallucinations. For example, me as a reader, when I still read your posts, you’re including people like my parents in these nutty toxic generalizations. People who would have helped you and sympathized with your if you were suffering. People, duh, with morals. You’re actually surpassing PK in this kind of thinking but on the other side. It’s sick. It’s a problem. It’s like some KKK or Nyilaskeresztes Párt flyer handed out with the specific intent of getting people to violence.
Is that what you want, violence, because you sound like someone who would like a nice self-righteous violent purge of perhaps 50% of the population.
A life of pure destruction on impulse. You don’t even know these people. If anything liberals in my world are on the stiff side, less spontaneous than many of their conservative peers. You’ve got some weird image of liberals based like on adolescent wokies having tantrums. And even there they don’t deserve the dehumanization. You’re filled with hate and not connnected to reality.
Seriously, this is toxic pre-violence rhetoric and if it wasn’t so fucking offensive, I’d wonder if you needed help. Maybe that’ll come later.
2 Likes
You both sound kinda over the top. Be nice.
1 Like
yeah, you should both do that
2 Likes
If its not your shoe then stop trying to lace it on.
The thing is my brother that i am coming from a world from before the internet. I know what used to be, what is, and what changed. And i have my experiences with liberals, which (im sure you can tell from the way i am talking about them) are highly specific and one directional.
The question is rather why you think you are included in the shit pile?
No.
Really.
Go on.
Indulge me.
Cause you aint gonna get to say that im the one hallucinating here when i can point you to any number of examples of what liberals are like, charlie kirk being just the tip of the iceberg we talked about in the other thread.
Do YOU feel like celebrating the shooting of a public speaker?
Cause here is 1+1 for you: If not, then you are not the type of person i am talking about.
If you understood the problem you’d not be considering yourself liberal in the first place.
Fuck you.
Honestly.
Thats my response.
I walked through this shit for 20+ years where my rights and speech is getting stripped step by step because of animals running on emotions only. Whether its your idea that its okay to punch a nazi or that somehow borders are now a crime on humanity, i spent a lifetime watching the left eroding every aspect of live and let live, of color blindness, of equality that has ever existed and fill the spaces with extremism.
And then you knock on my door how i am the one who wants violence?
Do you know what my side of the aisle is doing my dude? Like Daryl Davis and Kirk, they are trying to talk to the lot of you and they are chased and killed for it.
Daryl Davis turned KKK members as a black man.
He sat down with people and talked with them and made KKK members see reason.
When he tried to do the same with liberals, he was booed, he was not allowed to speak, he was chased away.
Get your fucking clue from that and take this bullshit argument to your side of the aisle and for a change ask THEM whether or not they want violence. AND YOUR ANSWER WILL BE YES.
I never wanted it for 20 years i was always the person who said live and let live, and now i am in a world that YOUR kind of apologist fuckers created where people are getting shot for talking and you are STILL making implication that somehow im the one wanting violence.
So sincerely. Fuck you.
Go ask the people about violence who are committing it.
Cause i never wanted it, its you who enabled it and even today are asking ME instead of THEM whether i want violence.
Sincerely fuck you for this one greenfuse.
This a hit so far below the belt that you can go fuck yourself.
Sick and tired of people like you who go into a ward of violent inmates and question the wardens why they are itching for violence. Take a hard look around before you open your mouth. People like you are probably more responsible for the fall of society than the actual animals which are doing the violence.
1 Like
il_Nulla:
Cause it was what liberals always are: A cesspit of literal and mental disease leading to poverty, homelessness, children born to be left on doorsteps (if they survived at all and their mothers didnt abort them), and eventually just culminating in a mass of people that cannot be differentiated from literal animals.
Full of disease, having no moral or ethical standards, led only by emotion and urges, leading a life of pure destruction on impulse, god damn the consequences.
K: practice much bigotry? just spewing crap for the sake of crap…
Let us practice some philosophy here… what is the basis for
or your knowledge of these accusations? what personal knowledge
that you have to substantiate these bogus charges?
""A cesspit of literal and mental disease leading to poverty,
homelessness and children born to be left on the doorsteps’’
OK, lets start there… where is your evidence that being liberal
is a ‘‘cesspit of literal? and mental diseases’’
although I don’t understand what this word ‘‘literal’’ means in this
context, anyway, do you have evidence of any kind to support
this bigotry and prejudice? You know facts that can be looked
up as knowledge? or are you just making shit up…
which I can also do…
‘‘il nulla likes to have sex with sheep’’
that is all it takes to make shit up… and of course, you are going to demand
that I provide some facts or evidence to show you have sex with sheep,
I am going to pull a conservative attitude, '‘I know it in my bones"’
or ‘‘everybody know this about il nulla’’ creating shit isn’t hard at all…
so, where is your evidence/fact supporting your contention about liberals?
Kropotkin
1 Like
Indeed. ‘Conservative’ voters never have sex. Or have unplanned pregnancies. Or get abortions. Or are gay. I get your hate boner for women but seriously, the ‘left/right black-and-white’ moronic and shallow labelling bullshit has got to end. It’s American fuckwitism and it has fucked up the human race and kept it in a vice of ignorance. It’s only getting worse.
1 Like
That’s what socialists always say, because they want to sneak their socialism in sideways.
1 Like
No. It’s what anyone with a brain who states facts would say. Keep your bullshit American bi-partisan political excrement away from my nose.
1 Like
Absolutely. A principal element of the socialist agenda is for anything non-socialist to be “brainless and nonfactual,” or whichever of a thousand ways to essentially frame socialism as the only cognitively possible choice (instead of the retarded servilism it is).
This will work on idiots who just want to check twatter for what their opinions should be. Which depressingly is an overwhelming majority of people outside the glorious US of A.
1 Like
Roman empire, Weimar, Soviets, Venezuela, Jacobin France… if the concept of “too much liberalism leads to the collapse of society” is “make shit up”, then im not sure what we can talk about in the first place.
Clearly human history is just a conspiracy theory for you and you know better.
What could lead to greater stability than ALL the freedoms? I dont even know why we arent just implementing anarchy.
You know what, dont take me serious on that one. Im sure you are so intellectual that you’d actually try it.
Indeed conservatives are known for “f it all” hippie mode where they abandon their children and families because getting railed by 60 people without a condom is the greatest life philosophy on earth.
Again: Feel free to dish out criticism as you like. The right is as far from perfect as the left gets, but do everyone a favor and at least own your shit if its yours? And dont try to strap it on if its not?
For everything else, both of you seem to be VERY confused about one thing:
Just because i abhor the cancer that is liberalism on the left, i am no advocate for the right wing or conservatives.
Every political test i did in my life marks me as left leaning, i just happen to feel very insulted by the implication of being compared to a set of unthinking mentally ill cultists.
1 Like
il_Nulla:
Roman empire, Weimar, Soviets, Venezuela, Jacobin France… if the concept of “too much liberalism leads to the collapse of society” is “make shit up”, then im not sure what we have to talk about in the first place.
K: ah, more vague shit, ‘‘too much liberalism leads to the collapse of society’’
what the hell does this even mean? Liberalism as in modern liberalism,
liberalism as in Roman empire liberalism, you are so vague as to
not even making any sense… and you have to, in some manner,
link up those states with their ‘‘fall’’ being caused by liberalism…
I would in fact argue, that Rome fell because it was far too
conservative… and that it failed to tax enough people to keep
the state going… the wealthy didn’t pay taxes in Rome, nor
did any religion pay taxes… I would advocate those two,
reasons, too conservative and not enough taxes money to
keep the society/state able to function…
as for the other states you listed, you still have to connect
liberalism with those states you mentioned to even have a point…
Your vagueness is not doing your arguments any good…
Kropotkin
1 Like
If these are vague concepts for you then i have nothing more to say cause you are asking me to hand hold you about elementary school level knowledge
Sorry. No. Ask an AI or something or feel free to believe that they are just my incoherent and insane ramblings since you cant make heads or tails of it anyway.
1 Like