Watch me "squish" the Earth

[anew1]

@greenfuse

@seeds

I mean, when was the last time you took a walk or a drive down a city boulevard and it suddenly dawned on you that you were in a situation that is precisely depicted in the upside-down city in the lower half of the image above?

For me the strangeness is even more fundamental. I have thought of things like that, more focused on the many movements, than the upside downness - which I seem to remember was in some cartoons when I was a kid - where people dig through the earth and arrive on the other side of the earth with a Chinese person looking up at the hole, though it’s down for them. But those kinds of things don’t hit me as hard as the fact of existence, the specificity, the fact that I am here and not there and many other sort of core ontological facets.

Once ‘you’ can separate ‘you’ from the ‘I’, and have already come to know, properly, Correctly, and fully who and what ‘you’ are, and, Who and What ‘I’ am, exactly, then ‘you’ won’t be ‘hit’ ‘as hard’, from then on.

By the way, there is only HERE, just like there is only NOW. So, ‘I’ can only be HERE, NOW, ONLY.

And, EVERY other so-called ‘sort of core ontological facets’, or what some people might refer to as ‘mysteries’ are also ALREADY KNOWN and WELL UNDERSTOOD, also.

@greenfuse

Then there’s time.

Another ‘word’ that the so-called “experts” have still not yet agreed upon and accepted ‘a definition’ for. Yet ‘they’ all like to talk ‘about it’ as though they know what ‘it’ is and as though they understand ‘it’.

But just like with ‘gravity’ and the so-called “experts” use Wrong words when talking ‘about gravity’, the same so-called “experts” use completely Wrong words when talking ‘about time’.