Watchmen

I caught Watchmen today and was absolutely stunned. I consider it to be without doubt the finest comic book film ever made, bar none, and one of the best movies I’ve seen in several years. Like The Dark Knight and Lord of the Rings, Watchmen is a film that transcends labels and demonstrates convincingly that action and “genre” pictures must taken as seriously as legitimate art as any other type of movie.

I’ll admit right now that I’m a lapsed comics fanboy. Although I haven’t purchased any books to speak of in the last decade or so I’ve still got many crates of comics in my closed, lovingly stored in individual poly bags with acid free cardboard backing. I first read the Watchmen graphic novel series in the late 80’s. Every since I’ve considered it the comics version of the Holy Bible, the geeks “Greatest Story Ever Told.” Over the years rumors continually popped up of a film adaption but nothing ever came of it. But when I saw the first trailer for the actual film some months back my hopes ran very high, and the finished product doesn’t disappoint.

Watchmen is a triumph on every level. It’s an incredible bit of visual storytelling for starters. The look is fantastic and the alternate version of Earth is tremendously effective. Many movies give us fictional presidents and nameless leaders, but the inclusion of so many real world historical figures from the 50’s thru the 80’s lends a surreal yet utterly compelling degree of tension and gravitas to the film. The eerie portrays of Nixon, Warhol and Iacocca were particularly effective in blurring the lines between fantasy fiction and reality, adding an extra degree of dreamlike, cognitive dissonance. Events of the film are thought provoking on many levels. When Osterman intervenes, effectively winning the war in Vietnam, the history we know is spun off it’s axis and we get four terms of Richard Nixon!

The film is also among the most atmospheric movies I’ve ever seen. Each scene seems to add layers of pathos to the story of world completely devoid of hope where every bit of idealism has been extinguished. The alternate 80’s seems to be holding its breath, fearing what what is to come yet utterly resigned to it. Every action seems to lead the world inexorably closer to its doom, and it seems even God/Manhattan is powerless to alter the worlds fated destrucion. The writing is spot on, from the film noire narration by Kovacs to eerie alt-history montage that opens the film. The characters are brilliantly developed; they’re fragile and flawed but real, reacting the way we might to a depressing and frightening world that’s circling the drain.

I can’t emphasis how they hit the jackpot with casting. Initially Keanu Reeves lobbied for a role ( :scared-yipes: #-o Yikes! No way, dOOd!), as did Watchmen-fan John Cusack and Ron Pearleman. While the latter two are fine actors I think the strong ensemble of lesser known yet gifted actors made the story much more believable and compelling. It would be distracting to continually think “Neo!” and the characters are sometimes subservient to the world and the story, something that would be difficult with a higher profile cast. Besides, the actors were uniformly brilliant, and I’d be hard pressed to think of even a couple roles that I’d have cast differently. Patrick Wilson (Night Owl), Jackie Earle Haley (Rorschach), Billy Crudup (Osterman/Manhattan) and Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Comedian) were astounding- the latter reminded me uncannily of an older Robert Downey Jr., and I’ll be disappointed if Wilson doesn’t snag an Oscar someday. ******** SPOILER ALERT!!! Skip the remainder of this paragraph if you don’t know the story! ******** The closest thing to a disconnect was Mathew Goode as Ozymandias. His performance was superb but he lacked the physicality that the role required, and it was a bit of a stretch watching him slap Night Owl and Rorschach around like rag dolls.

Watchmen is among the most faithful film adaption of a piece of literature that I’ve ever seen. It hits all the right notes, balancing a deep and abiding respect for the source material while adapting to the requirements of the medium of film. While I haven’t read the original in about 5 years, IIRC the story, there are only about two departures from the book worth noting, one fairly minor and one extremely major. ******** SPOILER ALERT!!! Skip the remainder of this paragraph if you don’t know the story! ******** The minor change, if it is one- I didn’t remember Rorschach being arrested or broken out of jail by Nite Owl & SS. No big deal. But the ending is a drastic departure, and although it doesn’t greatly affect the resolution of the story it was my sole great disappointment. In the original version Ozymandias used the machine to hoax an alien invasion, not frame Doctor Manhattan for the attacks. While Dr. O ultimately makes the same choice he does in the books I find it a bit less plausible that the world would unite under that threat the way they would have to an alien invasion. After all, Osterman is basically invincible, and it’s hard to imagine what strategy could even be contemplated to resist him. The nebulous alien threat from the novels seems more effective, although perhaps it would inject a cartoonish feel to a film with grittier aspirations.

All in all Watchmen is a tour de force, a nearly flawless virtuosic masterpiece of visual storytelling. Obviously I make no attempt to conceal my enthusiasm for this movie- it’s one of the most powerful and compelling films I’ve seen in the last five years. Make no mistake, the bar for comic book films has just been raised several notches. This one’s an Instant Classic! Two thumbs up & four-out-of-four from me, this one’s not to be missed! :bow-blue: :bow-yellow: :happy-partydance:

What a well crafted review! Thanx.
Boops and I are looking ‘foreward’ to seeing it.
Might buy it for a couple of bucks from amazon…

[size=200]Spoilers[/size]

Hey Phaed.

I caught the movie on the midnight showing last Saturday. Like you, I’m a bit of a comics geek, and still have a modest collection knocking about the shelves. And like you - I was looking forward to this movie, but also dreading it too. You know - all “whoo - this is going to be GREAT” before and all “Well, fuck, they really screwed that one” afterward.

But no. They really rather nailed it didn’t they. I sorta watched the first ‘build-up’ half with my chin on my fist going - “okay - I like what they did there” - and then the second half I just sat back and enjoyed it.

They stayed very true to the story - Rorsach going to jail is in the comicbook btw. as is the jailbreak - and deviated only once by omission - leaving out the rather bollocks anyway ‘tale of the black ship’ comic within a comic bit - and once by changing the ending.

And that change to the ending ACTUALLY made the story BETTER. That’s what blew me away. The original ending always struck a kinda “hmmm” cord with me whenever I read the comicbook, but the new ending is at once simpler, it doesn’t need so much of a deus ex machina jack-in-the-box factor and makes perfect sense.

I’m wondering if Alan Moore had been thinking for years “Shit, I wish I’d done it that way…” And only now with the film had his chance, not so much to change, as to correct a flaw.

Anyway. Agreed with everything you said about the casting, though I wish slightly they’d got someone a little less angular for Silhoette - she didn’t really do it for me. And the guy they got to play Ozymandius - he was a bit too chinless to convince, I think in a bare knuckle fight even paltry old me could’ve floored him. Mind you, he had to be a little on the geeky side I suppose. Real businessmen cum costume-heroes don’t make action figures.

:smiley:

Great film. 9.9 see it on as larger screen as you can find. It’s not a TV movie.

Yeah, the first “change” I noted isn’t a change but rather my forgetting that point- it’s been a few years since I last read it. Guess I’ll have to crack it out and read it again. I see your point re the ending; it makes sense. Still a ‘betrayal’ has a different flavor than an attack by extradimensional beings. Overall an exceptionally well done adaption; you can tell it was done with love.

I see that “Tales of the Black Freighter” will be released separately on DVD, with Gerard Butler voicing the main character. Sounds pretty cool, might have to check it out.

I’m gonna go watch this movie at my local Vue cinema over the weekend - can’t wait, so glad to know it’s good/worth sitting through… :smiley:

I’ll be sure to post my comments on it here, too…

[size=150]******** Caution! SPOILERS! ******** [/size]

To elaborate on this, maybe you are right. The original ending is very ‘comic book,’ and the visual shorthand of the tentacles & synthetic alien remnants laying in the streets plays on decades of comic book alien stories from the earliest Superman books to the Fantastic Four’s battles with Skrulls and The Surfer’s battles with the Kree. So a comic book geek, having seen that motif so frequently, sort of silently accepts it. But a story like Watchmen, set ostensibly in ‘the real world’ would be populated with people that would understand evidence of an alien attack quite differently. The simple fact of Ostermans near-omnipotence should open peoples minds to the possibility that the Universe is stranger than we can know, but a betrayal by him would play on some primal fears that most people must have had. It’s much like the way Superman is portrayed in most of the books- he takes orders from the President and is a jingoistic puppet, but what happens if he downs a few bottles of scotch and turns out to be a mean drunk? The only protection we have from an omniscient being is that creatures forebearance. When the lynchpin of your defense system is that being it’s bound to frighten people. So maybe you’re right after all.

Yeah, this one cries out for The Big Screen. Still, I’m anxious for the DVD. I have a projector & a 100" screen at home, but more importantly I have a far, far better sound system than any theater I’ve ever been in, Imax included. :evilfun:

Anyone read Kingdom Come a masterful DC graphic novel? They should make a movie about that horrifying/bleak future.

I agree this is much, much better than that posing, contrived, awkward Batman Dark Knight movie. At least here we have an attractive brunette doing the contrived, awkward posing.
But seriously it’s good.

Took myself off to watch Watchmen last Sunday…

Not as dynamic as I thought it would be, but a great film none-the-less - the trailer for the new Star Trek movie sold it to me, btw… :wink:

Very nicely constructed review and I agree with you on many points. Unfortunately, I finished reading the book not even 24 hours before going to see, so my enjoyment of the movie was a bit lessened.

As far as a film goes, I thought it was magnificently constructed but there were key things that made the story amazing for me that I thought were missing.

For one thing, the book had a subtlety to it that I would describe as distinctly British, while the film had a blunt American feeling as with the film as when they continuously seems to check back with the audience to see if they got the “joke.”

I was incredibly pleased with Rorschach. They gave you everything you needed for his story.

The biggest place of huh? for me comes from the end.

[size=150]Spoilers Next Paragraph**[/size]

I hated that they cut out Ozy’s “I did it!” line at the end. It showed so much of the childishness of the character. Also, I don’t know why they had Nite Owl see Rorschach die. That was not in the book. And, I missed having the conversation between Dr. M and Ozy. I loved it when Ozy asked Jon for affirmation of his actions then Jon tells him, “Nothing ends.” It was stupid to give that line to Silk Specter.

So, overall, I agree with you. Intellectually, I can say it was an amazing movie. But the fact that they got so much right, but there were little changes and just little things that could have been fixed that would have made it even more amazing.

Watchmen was probably the best movie ive ever seen, with the possible exception of The Dark Knight. it doesnt make sense to compare it to great but older cult classic hits like Donnie Darko or Mulholland Drive just because the modern comic movies (the ones that are so well done) seem to be in a cinematic league of their own.

in terms of scope, effects, dialogue, action, character development, originality, shooting, acting and the overall feeling of the film, Watchmen takes the cake. and i just read the release of the extended 3-hour DVD is on July 21st.

man, i cant even wait. i think im getting aroused just thinking about it. …hm, that might be a bit weird huh… oh well, there it is, i wont take it back :-"

This movie was a pile of trash. The characters were pathetically underdeveloped compared to sin city and it was too convoluted and disconnected to achieve the epic vision that 300 did. Both of these flaws were compounded by the fact that it was nearly 3 hours long and contained several false climaxes. About 45 minutes in I began wishing it was over due to how inconsistent it was; oscillating between epic imagery and interesting characters to some douche bag called night owl all the while being too confused and incomplete to absorb me.

It is one of the more annoying blockbusters I’ve seen in the past few years - behind transformers 2 and hancock.

Dear Sittlichkeit,

You’re pretty cool in my book, but with all due respect, 300 was historically inaccurate. The special effects were fantastic, despite the fact that they were a little over-the-top, but after learning about the history behind that movie, I felt that they tried some things that ought not have been tried. The most obvious example of this was their ridiculous piece-of-shit portrayal of Xerxes, that was just weird and inappropriate on about eighty-two different levels.

After I first saw the movie, I gave it a seven because much of it was still beyond belief (as much of it was meant to be) but mixing legitimate history with fantasy is a fundamentally flawed endeavor from my perspective, anyway. After learning about the history that was the, ahem, basis of the movie, I had no alternative but to drop that score down to a five.

With that said, Watchmen I have never seen, so I am not sure how it would compare (in my opinion) to 300.

I think I lack the gene that tells people to be put off by inaccurate historical portrayals. Although I will admit that the movie has lost much of it’s appeal since it became an internet sensation that spawned several horrible memes. I also didn’t care much for the self-awareness present in the forced speeches about how romantic their actions will be to history. The movie did, however, create a unique and epic vision that resulted in me experiencing it as total immersion.

For me, such a thing is both highly prized and very rare. It is one of only a handful of movies in the past 5 years that has given me this response…Gran Torino, V for Vendetta, the Matrix, August Rush, Sin City, 28 days later and 300.

‘Watchmen’ was a total let down, mediocrity at it’s finest. A waste of my $3.00.

Can I ask why you feel that way about the movie?

Probably cause it didn’t have Alain Delon in it.

:laughing:

…nothin wrong with that TTG :wink: