one giant’s electron chair is another giant’s sandwich chair, and to some giants, an electron is more giant, and at least one of those giants is probably named Tiny
just saying you missed a spot
one giant’s electron chair is another giant’s sandwich chair, and to some giants, an electron is more giant, and at least one of those giants is probably named Tiny
just saying you missed a spot
“We are all sandwich”
I support this message
That’s no way to refer to Tiny.
^^^ regard Lord Tiny with far more respect from here on out >:((
So you are asking what basis it is worth making any distinctions on?
Let me shoot the question back at you.
could you elaborate on that?
When you ask what separates chair from air, you are asking on what basis distinctions are made at all.
i am asking on the assumption that there are distinctions at all
By using words at all, you are making distinctions. So there is no question of whether they are there, there they are.
But the question I understood you to be asking by pointing out the apparent arbitrariness of any given distinction was on what basis to make them at all.
and the brain is wired for it
Yeah but she’s an anti dualist, so that really only postpones the question.
speak English
15 characters
Philosoph is the only language I know.
Will check out later.
As per this conversation.
Identity is what makes entities distinct from each other.
those identities are a construct…
so some things are constructs and some things are not?