We enjoy music what we are not, but could be.

People like depressed people’s music, epic music tragic music. They like bisexual people’s (Tchaikovsky’s) music, gay ballet songs.

This is because people enjoy music of what they are not, but could be.

For instance, they like music of snowy winters, of being a girl alone in the woods. They imagine they are a girl in the woods. They could be that someday. But is that what they really want to be, freezing alone in the woods? Sure they like hearing the tragedy in the opera, but do they want it to actually be happening to them?

We like moody songs, longing songs, emotionally sad songs, haunting melodies, because they are what we are not, but could be. Perhaps we subconsciously like the taste of our sadness, and we strive to be hurt, because we like the way it feels.

Mozart was a faggot who lived a boring life and made crude jokes. We enjoy his music, because it is like a piece of his aristocratically mundane life.
We love music which we do not strive to be in real life. This is the higher music, higher art.

Lower music, lower art, such as Nikki Minaj are exact mirrors. She is a dumb ho and a rachet bitch, and so isn’t her fans who listen to her music. There is no inversion, which is the key to sublime tastes.

To be fair, I think people see the richer tapestry of life, even if their lives are mundane. We should perhaps not judge that someones life is who they are, nor more importantly that they have less than what we have in our constitution.