3 posts were split to a new topic: Motion to Ban ‘anew1’ (split from “What a person is…”)
Well, ‘you’ or ANY one else could ‘go looking’ if ‘you’ or ‘they’ REALLY BELIEVE that ‘it’ is there, then it should NOT be too hard to find AT ALL.
Also, if ‘you’ EVER do ‘go back looking’ see if ‘you’ find ‘this question’ which I am supposedly NOT providing an answer for. I know I, for One, would certainly like to ‘look at’ it.
AGAIN, BECAUSE ‘you’ have NOT YET even sought out clarification and clarity ‘you’ have NEVER even found out what is ACTUALLY MEANT.
Back to the topic title here.
The word ‘person’ refers to ‘the personality’. The ‘personality’ is held within the invisible thoughts and emotions within a visible body. Thoughts and emotions only begin after the genetically created body is conceived. So, clearly, the ‘personality’ is solely because of what the body has experienced, and NOT a direct result of the genetics of the body.
I think it goes something like this (not quite sure). You’ll have to learn the definitions for three words: KNOW, BELIEVE, THINK. Here are the objectively correct definitions, it’s how God uses them. If you use different definitions, then you’re confused.
KNOW: 100% correct knowledge from the omniscient God (the One Mind). If anew1 says that he/she KNOWS something, then that something is absolutely and irrefutably true. If you doubt that KNOWLEDGE then you’re confused, something is wrong with you.
BELIEVE: Everyone is God, it’s just that almost every human alive in 2026 is still too retarded to realize this fact, and gain access to God’s KNOWLEDGE. We don’t KNOW things, instead we BELIEVE things, and our BELIEFS are usually dead wrong.
Now it’s important to note here that anew1 seems to have little to no functionality in the right hemisphere, which also handles degrees, uncertainty, probabilities. So anew1 has almost no concept of these things. As a result anew1 thinks that our beliefs have no degrees either, we can only 100% absolutely believe things, and can not be talked out of those in any way, and no amount of evidence, proof etc. can change our beliefs either.
THINK: When we don’t BELIEVE something, we just THINK it, but here we aren’t 100% sure and what we THINK can be changed using talk, evidence, proof etc.
Remember this is a God-being mainly from the lower brain / hindbrain, and has very limited access to higher cognitive functions, plus it’s even autistic on top of all that. Hope this helps 
I was referring to the words…
What has occurred here is that you allowed yourself to be lured into “A New One’s → Maze of Nonsense” - of which I (with the aid of Google AI back in August) depicted in the following image…
And as I stated in the thread where I first posted that image…
"…Instead of spending our time doing “philosophy,” or discussing something that several of us might find interesting at any given moment,…
…we are forced to deal with the resident troll who derails those conversations with his endless barrage of intrusive posts…
(sometimes, maybe a dozen in a row)
…in which he attacks pretty much everyone in the thread with condescending insults and multiple “LOLs” that, by the time the dust clears, all of the previous continuity of the conversation is completely gone and the thread is ruined.
And I’m guessing that because the mods haven’t had any extended personal encounters with this particular troll >>> [until now] <<< to get a feel and taste of his toxicity - up close and personal - they have yet to be motivated to do something about him…"
So, as you (Flannel Jesus) have suggested, corrective measures need to be taken, of which the very least would be a suspension in the hope that it compels him to find a little better approach at communicating with us humans “…in the days when this is being written…” 
2 Likes
I have NEVER even thought, let alone implied, nor let alone said absolutely anywhere that “flannel jesus” used a wrong definition. What “flannel jesus” has done here is just manipulate the situation AGAIN, and then used my reactions as some sort of “excuse” to ban me.
And, ‘the mob’ has got caught up and followed the lies and manipulation.
So, if ANY of this is Wrong, then just explain WHAT part/s, and then juse explain WHY.
LOL me NOT doing ‘this’ is the reason WHY I am being requested to be banned, once again.
Oh, and by the way, I suggest seeking out what I ACTUALLY say and claim, instead of relying on “atla’s” OWN interpretations and presumptions above, only.
Imagine being so insecure in your own beliefs that just because I present views and claims that oppose ‘their beliefs’, they get “offended” and do not want to hear anything that they cannot counter nor refute.
Some people come here with the most outrageous beliefs, which they obviously cannot support when challenged and questioned over them, so they want those who can actually put a challenge that they cannnot counter removed from speaking and highlighting the flaws, inconsistencies, and contradictions in their beliefs and claims.
Instead of allowing ‘free speech’, they want opposing views removed and silenced.
Now, back to the opening post here.
The reason “seeds” believes, absolutely, that after ‘human bodies’ what is call “die”, then this is when ‘the answers’ to Life’s so-called mysteries will be revealed ‘to people’, is because of the experiences that ‘that body’ ‘the person’ “seeds” is within, and NOT because “seeds” was born some particular way.
Which, by the way, believing that ‘people’ will come to know ‘the answers’ after so-called “death” is one way to have and hold onto ‘a belief’, which one never has to ever back up and support in any way at all. Which is similar to some theologies that made claims but when challenged over those claims, then say and claim things like, “We could never know”, or “you will find out later on”.
anew: That century IS the one WHEN EVERY one IS as ENLIGHTENED, as ‘I’ AM.
So, in that century all the humans are enlightened in the way the ‘I’ is. But are you ‘anew’ not enlightened like they are?
That century IS the one WHEN EVERY one IS as ENLIGHTENED, as ‘I’ AM.
Yes, but I don’t see a response to the previous post in either thread.
It’s a yes no question. Will you answer it?
Okay.
Have ‘I’ not answered it ‘for you’, before, already?
I haven’t seen the answer. It was sort of implied in that you hadn’t claimed that ‘anew’ was enlightened. But that doesn’t mean anew isn’t enlightened as the humans are in that century you mentioned where all human beings are enlightened.
Is ‘anew’ enlightened like the humans in that century?
A ‘person’ is always the result of the human body’s past experiences, and NOT genetics.