Again, there is no such thing as an âunconscious mindâ.
Unless, of course, you believe that you know there is, which, if you did, then you, surely, would be able to explain, simply, what it is exactly. What proof do you have for some such thing, which you call an âunconscious mindâ?
He constantly projects without noticing it. If he accuses someone of something, he is the quintessence of the trait, and often has shown this in the same post.
So, once more, your claims were based on absolutely nothing at all, except your own assumptions and beliefs, which you have absolutely no proof for at all. By the way, they exist solely because of the cult that you were born into and were brought up within, which you have still not yet recognised and become aware of.
LOL Even though I have Correct this one enough times, it still goes on to make these absolutely False claims, which LOL it believes are absolutely true and right.
You regularly conflate my lack of interest in discussing things with you, with my not being able to justify positions I have. You are not the world. Iâm sure youâve notice that I consider you a toxic discussion partner. I do understand how you would like to think if I do not engage with you the way you want, this proves negative things about me, but we can just add this to the huge heap of fallacious arguments you donât even manage to write out but just assume.
A typical cult leader manipulation technique. Say something that implies the cult leader has special powers. But donât claim it directly, because this is safer. Be mysterious.
Your words here are very much in line with the three principles of happiness. Now, Iâll restate your words using the three principles of happiness:
Principle One (Pursuing Oneâs Own Happiness): Individuals join groups to fulfill needs such as belonging and identity. However, the key difference between a cult and culture lies in that the former deprives its members of their ability to make independent judgments through information control, preventing them from truly âpursuing their own happinessâ; the latter, on the contrary, allows individuals to maintain a balance between identification and questioning, preserving their space for choice.
Principle Two (Do Not Infringe on Othersâ Happiness): The core pathology of a cult lies in systematic infringement: suppressing questions infringes upon membersâ intellectual autonomy, and the âstrong rejection of criticismâ further establishes a fear mechanism (wâ), causing members to self-censor out of fear of being excluded. A healthy culture, on the contrary, tolerates criticism, as its boundary is âdo not infringeâ rather than âdo not questionâ.
Principle Three (Building a Happy Environment): The authorâs question, âWhy must it be a strong aversion to criticism?â actually reveals that the distinction between a cult and culture does not lie in âwhether there is an aversion to criticismâ but in whether it allows for co-construction. A cult is a one-way âfollow - be ledâ relationship, closing off the negotiation process; culture, on the other hand, retains the channel for âquestioning everythingâ in co-construction, making rules subject to review and revision.
Conclusion: When leaders âcannot be questioned on everythingâ, the group has deviated from the three principles of happiness and has become a pseudo-cooperative structure that infringes under the guise of principle one - this is precisely the essence of a cult.
But, once more, I was not referring to that at all, nor was I ever before.
But, again, do not let this stop you from presuming and believing what you have been or whatever you would like to
Thank you for informing the readers here. Were you assuming that none of us would have known this before?
Considering that you have repeated this, and I have absolutely no reason to not accept that you consider this, I am not surprised at all that you are sure.
LOL What you claim you do understand here could not be MORE WRONG.
But, I understand that you will not accept THIS FACT.