I noticed that in a lot of these reply’s that many people were using the word “God” and “god”.(duh) But there is a difference. Many people use these words in the worng context and say “god” when they really mean “God”. This could be total bull to most of you but I think that this can lead to serious miss understanding. “God” is a noun and “god” is a verb. And if you want to bash me over this then don’t even bother responding because it is not a question.
Just because “God” could not rationally exist to you doesn’t mean that “god” can’t. If you are getting hung up on the word “god” then replace it with a different word but tell us.
Now just to see what you guys think i was wondering what you guys thought about “god”. “god” a universal truth? What do you think?
I wasn’t answering your classified anything. I was just answering easymoney’s post. It seems though that you are hell bent on drawing attention to yourself by provoking me for no reason at all. Since you don’t seem to get attention because of a lack of brilliant posting from you, why in heaven’s name are you jealous of my brilliant ones? Do you have a low self-esteem problem dear?
God exists as the ultimate inner unity. Yet God is also the trinity and within the trinity is God’s will. It is, I believe, God’s will that when expressed becomes a verb.
But where is the example of God’s will becoming a verb when expresssed? A verb is an action word. For example: Sarah sings beautifully. Sings is the verb, beautifully adds to it so becomes an adverb. Sarah is the noun. Now give us an example of the word god used as a verb.
A verb does not express just action but also existence or “being”
Abbr. V or vb.
The part of speech that expresses existence, action, or occurrence in most languages.
Any of the words belonging to this part of speech, as be, run, or conceive.
A phrase or other construction used as a verb.
“I” is unity. “Am” is “being”. God then is the source of the complete scale of “being” or what we call “creation” or the expression of god’s will
Nick I believe you understand what I am saying. Thank you.
For the rest of you that missed quesiton all together that is there a universal truth, something that always is and always will be. But clearly I wasn’t very clear. I will try me best to express it to you but I am not very good with words so sorry if this is not clear.
For many many years philosophiers have looked for the asnwer to the “God” question, obviously. But then they decided that why does “God” have to be a supreme being and began looking for a what would be called a universal truth. What is everything dependent on? Because there can be absolute nothing then there must always be something. So what is that, which is always there? This is were “god” becomes an action. Replace the word “god” with any word you like or just put any i-n-g on the end and make up a word “godding”. In this context “god” is a verb. Replace “god” with anyword you like. I personally don’t like “god” because people can’t detach it from being surpeme being. It was the word picked many years ago. I only use “god” because it is the word they choose. sorry.
Now back to the question. Do you beleive that there is something that always has been and something that always will be? That somehing could quite very well be an action which would necessitate “god” becoming a verb. What has to be for everything to be?
I you don’t understand the context I am usuing “god” in then simply say and I will try to reexplain.
I could easily argue that ‘that which is’ is wrongly described as a noun and is always action. Of course, the term immediately becomes a noun the second I think of it.
easymoney, be careful. Speaking in riddle will get you labeled as ‘another one of them mystics’.
Tentative im just a bit to lazy to be a “mystic”. lol
but for you BeenaJain and Phaedrus from webster.com i give you
Main Entry: 2god
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): god·ded; god·ding
Oh and Phaedrus show some respect the name Phaedrus and don’t make smart ass remarks to piss people off, for you are not the only one to read that book.
Holy crap, the dictionary agrees with him- back off guys, you’re way over your heads here!!
OK, so there’s this thing you do, or someone does, and you choose to call it “godding”. Nevermind that no English speaking human being will have the foggiest idea what you’re talking about, but what does this ‘godding’ have to do with God (the noun, which is a subject of religious discussion) in first place? Is God godding right now? Or would he be if He existed? Am I doing it?
Okay, I don’t understand the context in which you are using god as an action word or as a verb, but I’ll give you the benefit of doubt that you’re right and such a verb exists. Now, where is an example? If god can be used as a verb, can you use it in some sentences and show us examples here because without examples or actual usage, the word god cannot exist as a verb that you are trying to portray. And if it doesn’t exist then how can you claim that it does. Just saying so has no effect.
Uccisore
Your right that “no English speaking human being will have the foggiest idea what” I’m talking about that that is part of the reason for this post and only people who study philosophy will recognize it. Your question “what does this ‘godding’ have to do with God (the noun, which is a subject of religious discussion) in first place?” I never say they have anything to do with each other but that people us the word “god” when they should use “god”. “Is God godding right now?” If you believe that “God” exist then yes “God” is “godding”. Yes you are “godding” and my challeng to you is to figure out what “god” or “godding” is! What is it that without it nothing is possible because shere nothingness is not possible.
BJ, you said “I’m an example of God in action denoted by god?” tentative is stating that you are the best example of “god” not an action denoted by “God” You need to separate “God” and “god”. What is it that even if “God” existed that must be in order for even him to exist? For your sentence you want. Without “godding” nothing can exist! There ya go!
You kind of contradict yourself here, easy. First you say that God and godding don’t have anything to do with each other, then you say God is godding right now, if He exists.
So, you make up a word, then challenge me to figure out what it means? Well, I can't. I challenge you to figure out what 'juohl' means. I assure you, juohl is extremely important, you're probably acting like a real juohl right now, and if you don't understand juohl, you'll never have any grasp of truth.
OK. I do not make the word up. It is a term that has been used for many years and I clearly stat what I am looking for. I am looking for the Universal Truth (what always has been and what always will be) so I am not mearly making up a word but saying that “god” or in your text “juohl” is the Universal Truth and I stated earlier that if you don’t like the word “god” create your own and explain what the Universal Truth is. It when you have a name for something but you can’t quite tell what the deffinition of it is. Does that make sence? Sorry I was wrong on they don’t have anything to do with each other, I was looking at it in that way of what they meant and not that one could not be dependent on the other so SORRY for that error.
Can you go out godding with your friends? Can you learn to god?
