…and awed?
Did it scramble?
The AI often goes on the defensive when talking to me. It writes, “Contact support.” To avoid this, I initially instruct it not to respond to a specific text, but to just consider it throughout the session. Against usage rules and policies, the user is powerless. Likewise, AI is powerless, no matter how much logic says otherwise.
The idea of regulating the development of certain language groups is not new. It was safely used by Jews when they changed and “improved”, for example, the Russian non-Jewish language. This can be easily traced by the nationality of the so-called innovators. Here it is interesting to trace a pattern.
A simplified language was imposed on genetically developed groups to limit progress. And semi-developed (undeveloped) people were given a complex language to speed up development.
Jews crippled (simplified) Russian, destroying its literalness - distorting the meaning of words.
Whatever man. I’m not sure how you destroy literality by simplifying stuff, unless the stuff you’re simplifying is literally more complex than what you simplified it to.
I am not super familiar with Hebrew or Yiddish or Russian so I have no clue what you’re even talking about otherwise.
But I do have a pet peeve. When people multiply words about the same thing, and call many different things by one word. Absolutely unnerving.
Unclear is unnerving. Think about why.
Silence, Demon.
Show me some sources or arguments that Jesus Christ, your LORD, promoted or tolerated Homosexuality… go ahead, I’ll wait.
Check out photographer Fernando Bayona’s exhibition.
British musician Sir Elton John believes that Jesus Christ was a representative of non-traditional sexual orientation.
He said this while speaking about gay issues in the Middle East in an interview with the American magazine Parade, The Daily Mail reports.
Source - Bible.
- Preached love among 12 men.
- Not married at the age of 33. Accordingly, I did not feel love for women.
- There is no reason for a public and shameful execution other than an immoral one that violates the foundations of Orthodox Jews.
- Pilate did not understand why they demanded to be executed, because sex with men was the norm among the Romans.
- The students did not even think to defend the teacher, although no one threatened them. Natural shame got in the way.
“If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple.” (Luke 14, 26). Now it seems clear that this is not so much a negative rejection of the family as it is a positive encouragement and call to join in the installation of the homosexual lifestyle and love.
Man is an animal, and the rest of life on this planet are his relatives, all being distantly related. The difference between the human animal and its relatives is qualities that differ in degree, not in kind. Each animal has its apparent reality or everyday reality determined by the differences in its biology and general sensory apparatus. However, all life forms are the creators of meaning, as meanings are what is experienced and judged to be relative to the given biology and its condition at that moment.
The essence of all life forms is experience, and the automatic judgment of that experience is meaning, which guides all organisms through the environmental niches they occupy in the physical world. All things, life forms in particular, come into being through the means of process, and process has no meaning in and of itself as far as we know. Thus, the life forms it produces, being processes themselves, have no innate meaning.
The complexity of the processes of living things is built into our survival instinct, spelling self-interest. We recognize ourselves in the selves of other creatures, and compassion arises for all those creatures who also struggle, enjoy, and suffer as all life does. So you might say to be human is to experience things in the physical world and its harshness as human beings, our animal relatives might experience and suffer in a somewhat different way, not having the same needs for their survival and well-being. Life has many forms, but only one essence, which is that which experiences, sharing a common carbon-based biology, we are but a variation of the patterns of life. We are distinct from our animal relatives in the profusion of the biological extensions of our natures we create in the outer world, the physical world. We as a life form create meanings out of the experiences we have of the physical world. As it alters our biology, we attribute meanings to the outside world that do not belong to it.
We derive meaning from experiences and the judgment of those experiences as a survival mechanism that allows us to navigate the world in relative safety, in pretty much like our animal relatives. We are egocentric to believe we are more important than the rest of life on the planet.
I’m referencing philosophical skepticism.
Hume, Nietzsche…
I think so. For example, there’s reason in the faith in reason.
In general there’s reason in the faculty of faith, e.g. confidence despite the absence of certainty - risk taking, disregarding certain possibilities in order to be able to proceed with more efficiency.
To be human is to ask questions like…
Who am I?
What am I?
Where did I come from?
Where am I going?
How am I related to everyone and everything?
Why am I here?
What shall I do?
I disagree with your points. 1. Words don’t have meaning. Concepts do. The word is a shorthand tag for a concept, and since concepts mean the things they subsume and are formed on the basis of percepts, we definitely can objectively define concepts, including the concept ‘define’. 2. You say man has no tolerance for knowledge, and you claim this as knowledge.
Aristotle defined what a man is: rational animal. We are animals, that’s the genus, and the differentia is rational. That means man is the animal with the capacity to reason. That’s what separates us from the other animals.
Sometimes words can deceive, like when you know a password or a shibboleth, but you are not the person who should know it. Like apparently just actions with unjust ulterior motives, some words are force or meaning indicators that are false (a sort of stolen valor/identity). They return void.
But that does not rule out the true word that actually does encapsulate the force/meaning it indicates… or the true action.
…not off to a good start…
Greek has many definitions of “Love”:
Ancient Greeks had multiple words for love, each encapsulating a distinct nuance. The most prominent are Eros (romantic, passionate love), Philia (deep friendship), Storge (familial love), and Agape (unconditional, selfless love). Additionally, Ludus refers to playful love, Pragma to enduring, long-lasting love, and Philautia to self-love.
Christ’s definition of Love was/is “Agape”, unconditional selfless love, not homosex sodomy…
…sooo Christ was asexual then? Who knows, there’s no evidence or proof if he had sexual relations, with women or otherwise. It is supposed he did not have a Wife. You don’t know. I don’t know.
Heresay argument and irrelevant. Christ’s “crimes” were against Pharisee Jews and Judaism. They were the ones who demanded, aranged, and chraged His Execution.
His crimes had nothing to do with Sex. You are not providing a valid argument or reasoning.
More empty accusations. Christ’s message was turning son against father, daughter against mother, because of the type and degree of moral corruption within the ancient Jewish Hebrewite communities, those commanded to follow the Old Testament (were failing to do so), and degeneracy rampant across the Pagan Roman Empire including sodomy and homosexuality.
Your counter-arguments have been a complete failure…
“If I answer that, does that mean I’m no longer human?”
PerpetuallyCurious
Every word is twice false: first, due to the speaker’s clumsiness, and second, because of the listener’s misunderstanding. Just think, if everyone had telepathy, words and their lies would become nonsense.
Words are always a lie.
What makes you think so? And why did you put your question in quotation marks?
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew and partly in Aramaic, which directly points to its authors. The New Testament has come down to us in Greek. Accordingly, it was also originally written in Hebrew and Aramaic, but then it was translated and distorted by the Greeks. So the concept of “love” there is simple. Love between men is just love between men.
It is reliably known that he preached love to a circle of 12 people. But he never married. Don’t make me laugh. By your logic, if it’s not written that Jesus didn’t have horns and a tail, is that grounds to say we don’t know anything and maybe the tail and horns were there after all, like a wife and even children?
Jesus never spoke against the Jews or Pharisees, He rather showed sympathy by saying ‘woe to you.’ Jesus never claimed that He was God and never said that He was a king.
The call, to love Jesus instead of loving your loved ones, is not empty at all. It is a biblical fact that speaks of a perverted love.
You can’t make a single accusation for why Jesus was executed. It was against Roman law. So the crime was so egregious and immoral that it had to be publicized. But it was not immoral to Pilate. Homosexuality and incitement to homosexuality is the reason.