What is a ph.d? What can the psychologist do for themselves?

Philosophy Forums Psychology and Mind
1

A person who has a ph.d. is a law requirement to teach colleges.
What about those who did not recieve no ph.d.? and recieve an invitation to teach?

IF you study and got a ph.d. in like law, is he a good lawyer? If he got a buisness phd. is he rich? Is his aim, is to make his students be like him?

Now, those who have mastered life( what we assume life is about)
is he good then? He lived universally succesful does that means a successful life leds to a successful teaching( right method of teaching ).

2

no, it is not necessary to have a phd to teach at colleges

-Imp

3

Only those who does not have a reputation may have to considered to hav a ph.d .
Or you can say, a teachers degree on education.

4

actually many professors teach undergrad college with batchelor degrees while working to complete their post grad work.

-Imp

5

=P~ either that is interesting or that is a waste.

What about this, if you have a ph.d. does that means he is really good at something what he talks about, or just good at what he remembers and knows about?

6

having a phd only means they have (P)iled shit (H)igher and (D)eeper…

having a degree doesn’t make a good educator

-Imp

7

O’s higher deeper shit?
Then what does make a good educator?

8

good students

-Imp

9

So are you saying good students should be teachers?

Or good students who were trained by good educators should be the employees of companies?

10

no, I am saying you can’t have one without the other

you can be the best teacher all day, but if the pupils are busy screwing around in the back, they aren’t learning

the employees should be those whom the employer deems qualified and necessary.

-Imp

11

if i understand you correctly, this is what you mean.

In order to have a good teacher, you must have good students. In order to have good students you must have a good teacher.

A good student is a person who is willing to participate, listen, respect, and bring out entusaism for the other classmates to arouse questions.
While, a good teacher, is to answer questions, teach their objectives, and bring a friendly and discpline atmosphere in the class.

Am I right. OR is this right?